The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From fb544d1ca65a89f7a3895f7531221ceeed74ada7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall@arm.com Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:23:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: Fix VMID alloc race by reverting to lock-less

We recently addressed a VMID generation race by introducing a read/write lock around accesses and updates to the vmid generation values.

However, kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run() also calls need_new_vmid_gen() but does so without taking the read lock.

As far as I can tell, this can lead to the same kind of race:

VM 0, VCPU 0 VM 0, VCPU 1 ------------ ------------ update_vttbr (vmid 254) update_vttbr (vmid 1) // roll over read_lock(kvm_vmid_lock); force_vm_exit() local_irq_disable need_new_vmid_gen == false //because vmid gen matches

enter_guest (vmid 254) kvm_arch.vttbr = <PGD>:<VMID 1> read_unlock(kvm_vmid_lock);

enter_guest (vmid 1)

Which results in running two VCPUs in the same VM with different VMIDs and (even worse) other VCPUs from other VMs could now allocate clashing VMID 254 from the new generation as long as VCPU 0 is not exiting.

Attempt to solve this by making sure vttbr is updated before another CPU can observe the updated VMID generation.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: f0cf47d939d0 "KVM: arm/arm64: Close VMID generation race" Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry julien.thierry@arm.com Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c index 4adcee5fc126..d9273f972828 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_vcpu *, kvm_arm_running_vcpu); static atomic64_t kvm_vmid_gen = ATOMIC64_INIT(1); static u32 kvm_next_vmid; static unsigned int kvm_vmid_bits __read_mostly; -static DEFINE_RWLOCK(kvm_vmid_lock); +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(kvm_vmid_lock);

static bool vgic_present;

@@ -484,7 +484,9 @@ void force_vm_exit(const cpumask_t *mask) */ static bool need_new_vmid_gen(struct kvm *kvm) { - return unlikely(kvm->arch.vmid_gen != atomic64_read(&kvm_vmid_gen)); + u64 current_vmid_gen = atomic64_read(&kvm_vmid_gen); + smp_rmb(); /* Orders read of kvm_vmid_gen and kvm->arch.vmid */ + return unlikely(READ_ONCE(kvm->arch.vmid_gen) != current_vmid_gen); }

/** @@ -499,16 +501,11 @@ static void update_vttbr(struct kvm *kvm) { phys_addr_t pgd_phys; u64 vmid, cnp = kvm_cpu_has_cnp() ? VTTBR_CNP_BIT : 0; - bool new_gen;

- read_lock(&kvm_vmid_lock); - new_gen = need_new_vmid_gen(kvm); - read_unlock(&kvm_vmid_lock); - - if (!new_gen) + if (!need_new_vmid_gen(kvm)) return;

- write_lock(&kvm_vmid_lock); + spin_lock(&kvm_vmid_lock);

/* * We need to re-check the vmid_gen here to ensure that if another vcpu @@ -516,7 +513,7 @@ static void update_vttbr(struct kvm *kvm) * use the same vmid. */ if (!need_new_vmid_gen(kvm)) { - write_unlock(&kvm_vmid_lock); + spin_unlock(&kvm_vmid_lock); return; }

@@ -539,7 +536,6 @@ static void update_vttbr(struct kvm *kvm) kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_flush_vm_context); }

- kvm->arch.vmid_gen = atomic64_read(&kvm_vmid_gen); kvm->arch.vmid = kvm_next_vmid; kvm_next_vmid++; kvm_next_vmid &= (1 << kvm_vmid_bits) - 1; @@ -550,7 +546,10 @@ static void update_vttbr(struct kvm *kvm) vmid = ((u64)(kvm->arch.vmid) << VTTBR_VMID_SHIFT) & VTTBR_VMID_MASK(kvm_vmid_bits); kvm->arch.vttbr = kvm_phys_to_vttbr(pgd_phys) | vmid | cnp;

- write_unlock(&kvm_vmid_lock); + smp_wmb(); + WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.vmid_gen, atomic64_read(&kvm_vmid_gen)); + + spin_unlock(&kvm_vmid_lock); }

static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)