This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.38 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jul 2023 08:46:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.38-rc2.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 6.1.38-rc2
Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org gup: avoid stack expansion warning for known-good case
Rodrigo Siqueira Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com drm/amd/display: Ensure vmin and vmax adjust for DCE
Bas Nieuwenhuizen bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl drm/amdgpu: Validate VM ioctl flags.
Ahmed S. Darwish darwi@linutronix.de docs: Set minimal gtags / GNU GLOBAL version to 6.6.5
Ahmed S. Darwish darwi@linutronix.de scripts/tags.sh: Resolve gtags empty index generation
Krister Johansen kjlx@templeofstupid.com perf symbols: Symbol lookup with kcore can fail if multiple segments match stext
Finn Thain fthain@linux-m68k.org nubus: Partially revert proc_create_single_data() conversion
Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org execve: always mark stack as growing down during early stack setup
Mario Limonciello mario.limonciello@amd.com PCI/ACPI: Call _REG when transitioning D-states
Bjorn Helgaas bhelgaas@google.com PCI/ACPI: Validate acpi_pci_set_power_state() parameter
Aric Cyr aric.cyr@amd.com drm/amd/display: Do not update DRR while BW optimizations pending
Alvin Lee Alvin.Lee2@amd.com drm/amd/display: Remove optimization for VRR updates
Max Filippov jcmvbkbc@gmail.com xtensa: fix lock_mm_and_find_vma in case VMA not found
-------------
Diffstat:
Documentation/process/changes.rst | 7 +++++ Makefile | 4 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 4 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++------------- drivers/nubus/proc.c | 22 ++++++++++--- drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- include/linux/mm.h | 4 ++- mm/memory.c | 4 +++ mm/nommu.c | 7 ++++- scripts/tags.sh | 9 +++++- tools/perf/util/symbol.c | 17 ++++++++-- 11 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
Hi Greg
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 5:49 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.38 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jul 2023 08:46:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.38-rc2.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
6.1.38-rc2 tested.
Build successfully completed. Boot successfully completed. No dmesg regressions. Video output normal. Sound output normal.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen10(Intel i7-1260P(x86_64), arch linux)
Thanks
Tested-by: Takeshi Ogasawara takeshi.ogasawara@futuring-girl.com
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 09:48:32AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.38 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Successfully compiled and installed bindeb-pkgs on my computer (Acer Aspire E15, Intel Core i3 Haswell). No noticeable regressions.
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya bagasdotme@gmail.com
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 09:48:32AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.38 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Tested-by: Conor Dooley conor.dooley@microchip.com
Cheers, Conor.
On 7/4/23 1:48 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.38 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jul 2023 08:46:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.38-rc2.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos re@w6rz.net
On 7/4/23 01:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.38 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jul 2023 08:46:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.38-rc2.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 6.1.38-rc2
Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org gup: avoid stack expansion warning for known-good case
I am a bit puzzled by this patch. It avoids a warning introduced with upstream commit a425ac5365f6 ("gup: add warning if some caller would seem to want stack expansion"), or at least it says so, but that patch is not in v6.1.y. Why is this patch needed here ?
Thanks, Guenter
Rodrigo Siqueira Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com drm/amd/display: Ensure vmin and vmax adjust for DCE
Bas Nieuwenhuizen bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl drm/amdgpu: Validate VM ioctl flags.
Ahmed S. Darwish darwi@linutronix.de docs: Set minimal gtags / GNU GLOBAL version to 6.6.5
Ahmed S. Darwish darwi@linutronix.de scripts/tags.sh: Resolve gtags empty index generation
Krister Johansen kjlx@templeofstupid.com perf symbols: Symbol lookup with kcore can fail if multiple segments match stext
Finn Thain fthain@linux-m68k.org nubus: Partially revert proc_create_single_data() conversion
Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org execve: always mark stack as growing down during early stack setup
Mario Limonciello mario.limonciello@amd.com PCI/ACPI: Call _REG when transitioning D-states
Bjorn Helgaas bhelgaas@google.com PCI/ACPI: Validate acpi_pci_set_power_state() parameter
Aric Cyr aric.cyr@amd.com drm/amd/display: Do not update DRR while BW optimizations pending
Alvin Lee Alvin.Lee2@amd.com drm/amd/display: Remove optimization for VRR updates
Max Filippov jcmvbkbc@gmail.com xtensa: fix lock_mm_and_find_vma in case VMA not found
Diffstat:
Documentation/process/changes.rst | 7 +++++ Makefile | 4 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 4 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++------------- drivers/nubus/proc.c | 22 ++++++++++--- drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- include/linux/mm.h | 4 ++- mm/memory.c | 4 +++ mm/nommu.c | 7 ++++- scripts/tags.sh | 9 +++++- tools/perf/util/symbol.c | 17 ++++++++-- 11 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 07:23:30AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 7/4/23 01:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.38 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jul 2023 08:46:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.38-rc2.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 6.1.38-rc2
Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org gup: avoid stack expansion warning for known-good case
I am a bit puzzled by this patch. It avoids a warning introduced with upstream commit a425ac5365f6 ("gup: add warning if some caller would seem to want stack expansion"), or at least it says so, but that patch is not in v6.1.y. Why is this patch needed here ?
It isn't, and was dropped for -rc2, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
On 7/5/23 09:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 07:23:30AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 7/4/23 01:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.38 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jul 2023 08:46:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.38-rc2.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 6.1.38-rc2
Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org gup: avoid stack expansion warning for known-good case
I am a bit puzzled by this patch. It avoids a warning introduced with upstream commit a425ac5365f6 ("gup: add warning if some caller would seem to want stack expansion"), or at least it says so, but that patch is not in v6.1.y. Why is this patch needed here ?
It isn't, and was dropped for -rc2, right?
The above is from the -rc2 log so, no, it was not dropped. I checked in the repository to be sure. It is also in v6.3.12-rc2 and v6.4.2-rc2, but there it makes sense because a425ac5365f6 was applied/backported to those branches.
Thanks, Guenter
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 09:13:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 7/5/23 09:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 07:23:30AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 7/4/23 01:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.38 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jul 2023 08:46:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.38-rc2.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 6.1.38-rc2
Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org gup: avoid stack expansion warning for known-good case
I am a bit puzzled by this patch. It avoids a warning introduced with upstream commit a425ac5365f6 ("gup: add warning if some caller would seem to want stack expansion"), or at least it says so, but that patch is not in v6.1.y. Why is this patch needed here ?
It isn't, and was dropped for -rc2, right?
The above is from the -rc2 log so, no, it was not dropped. I checked in the repository to be sure. It is also in v6.3.12-rc2 and v6.4.2-rc2, but there it makes sense because a425ac5365f6 was applied/backported to those branches.
Ah, I must have dropped it right after the -rc2 announcement, it's been a long week already: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/comm...
but be sure, it's gone from all branches now.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 05:25:24PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 09:13:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 7/5/23 09:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 07:23:30AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 7/4/23 01:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.38 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jul 2023 08:46:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.38-rc2.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 6.1.38-rc2
Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org gup: avoid stack expansion warning for known-good case
I am a bit puzzled by this patch. It avoids a warning introduced with upstream commit a425ac5365f6 ("gup: add warning if some caller would seem to want stack expansion"), or at least it says so, but that patch is not in v6.1.y. Why is this patch needed here ?
It isn't, and was dropped for -rc2, right?
The above is from the -rc2 log so, no, it was not dropped. I checked in the repository to be sure. It is also in v6.3.12-rc2 and v6.4.2-rc2, but there it makes sense because a425ac5365f6 was applied/backported to those branches.
Ah, I must have dropped it right after the -rc2 announcement, it's been a long week already: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/comm...
but be sure, it's gone from all branches now.
Great, thanks!
Guenter
* Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.38 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jul 2023 08:46:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg
6.1.38-rc2
compiles, boots and runs here on x86_64 (AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, Slackware64-15.0)
Tested-by: Markus Reichelt lkt+2023@mareichelt.com
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 09:48:32AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.38 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jul 2023 08:46:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 157 pass: 157 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 519 pass: 519 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
Hello Greg,
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2023 9:49 AM
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.38 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jul 2023 08:46:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Thank you for the release!
CIP configurations built and booted okay with Linux 6.1.38-rc2 (185484ee4c4f): https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/pipelines/92... https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/commits/linu...
Tested-by: Chris Paterson (CIP) chris.paterson2@renesas.com
Kind regards, Chris
On Tue, 04 Jul 2023 09:48:32 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.38 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jul 2023 08:46:01 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.38-rc2.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.1: 7 builds: 7 pass, 0 fail 22 boots: 22 pass, 0 fail 104 tests: 104 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.1.38-rc2-g185484ee4c4f Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Bagas Sanjaya -
Chris Paterson -
Conor Dooley -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Markus Reichelt -
ogasawara takeshi -
Ron Economos