This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.15.23-rc1
Herbert Xu herbert@gondor.apana.org.au crypto: api - Move cryptomgr soft dependency into algapi
Namjae Jeon linkinjeon@kernel.org ksmbd: fix SMB 3.11 posix extension mount failure
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch scgl@linux.ibm.com KVM: s390: Return error on SIDA memop on normal guest
Anshuman Khandual anshuman.khandual@arm.com arm64: Add Cortex-A510 CPU part definition
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++-- arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h | 2 ++ arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 ++ crypto/algapi.c | 1 + crypto/api.c | 1 - drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +- fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c | 2 +- 7 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
commit bd2db32e7c3e35bd4d9b8bbff689434a50893546 upstream.
It was reported that the mmc host structure could be accessed after it was freed in moxart_remove(), so fix this by saving the base register of the device and using it instead of the pointer dereference.
Cc: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org Cc: Xiyu Yang xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn Cc: Xin Xiong xiongx18@fudan.edu.cn Cc: Xin Tan tanxin.ctf@gmail.com Cc: Tony Lindgren tony@atomide.com Cc: Yang Li yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: whitehat002 hackyzh002@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127071638.4057899-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.or... Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c @@ -705,12 +705,12 @@ static int moxart_remove(struct platform if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(host->dma_chan_rx)) dma_release_channel(host->dma_chan_rx); mmc_remove_host(mmc); - mmc_free_host(mmc);
writel(0, host->base + REG_INTERRUPT_MASK); writel(0, host->base + REG_POWER_CONTROL); writel(readl(host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL) | CLK_OFF, host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL); + mmc_free_host(mmc);
return 0; }
From: Anshuman Khandual anshuman.khandual@arm.com
commit 53960faf2b731dd2f9ed6e1334634b8ba6286850 upstream.
Add the CPU Partnumbers for the new Arm designs.
Cc: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: Will Deacon will@kernel.org Cc: Suzuki Poulose suzuki.poulose@arm.com Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose suzuki.poulose@arm.com Acked-by: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual anshuman.khandual@arm.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1643120437-14352-2-git-send-email-anshuman.khandua... Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poirier@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ #define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A76 0xD0B #define ARM_CPU_PART_NEOVERSE_N1 0xD0C #define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A77 0xD0D +#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A510 0xD46
#define APM_CPU_PART_POTENZA 0x000
@@ -113,6 +114,7 @@ #define MIDR_CORTEX_A76 MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM, ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A76) #define MIDR_NEOVERSE_N1 MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM, ARM_CPU_PART_NEOVERSE_N1) #define MIDR_CORTEX_A77 MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM, ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A77) +#define MIDR_CORTEX_A510 MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM, ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A510) #define MIDR_THUNDERX MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_CAVIUM, CAVIUM_CPU_PART_THUNDERX) #define MIDR_THUNDERX_81XX MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_CAVIUM, CAVIUM_CPU_PART_THUNDERX_81XX) #define MIDR_THUNDERX_83XX MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_CAVIUM, CAVIUM_CPU_PART_THUNDERX_83XX)
From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch scgl@linux.ibm.com
commit 2c212e1baedcd782b2535a3f86bc491977677c0e upstream.
Refuse SIDA memops on guests which are not protected. For normal guests, the secure instruction data address designation, which determines the location we access, is not under control of KVM.
Fixes: 19e122776886 (KVM: S390: protvirt: Introduce instruction data area bounce buffer) Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch scgl@linux.ibm.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger borntraeger@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c @@ -4708,6 +4708,8 @@ static long kvm_s390_guest_sida_op(struc return -EINVAL; if (mop->size + mop->sida_offset > sida_size(vcpu->arch.sie_block)) return -E2BIG; + if (!kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu)) + return -EINVAL;
switch (mop->op) { case KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_READ:
From: Namjae Jeon linkinjeon@kernel.org
commit 9ca8581e79e51c57e60b3b8e3b89d816448f49fe upstream.
cifs client set 4 to DataLength of create_posix context, which mean Mode variable of create_posix context is only available. So buffer validation of ksmbd should check only the size of Mode except for the size of Reserved variable.
Fixes: 8f77150c15f8 ("ksmbd: add buffer validation for SMB2_CREATE_CONTEXT") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.15+ Reported-by: Steve French smfrench@gmail.com Tested-by: Steve French stfrench@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon linkinjeon@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Steve French stfrench@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c +++ b/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c @@ -2690,7 +2690,7 @@ int smb2_open(struct ksmbd_work *work) (struct create_posix *)context; if (le16_to_cpu(context->DataOffset) + le32_to_cpu(context->DataLength) < - sizeof(struct create_posix)) { + sizeof(struct create_posix) - 4) { rc = -EINVAL; goto err_out1; }
From: Herbert Xu herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
commit c6ce9c5831cae515d375a01b97ae1778689acf19 upstream.
The soft dependency on cryptomgr is only needed in algapi because if algapi isn't present then no algorithms can be loaded. This also fixes the case where api is built-in but algapi is built as a module as the soft dependency would otherwise get lost.
Fixes: 8ab23d547f65 ("crypto: api - Add softdep on cryptomgr") Reported-by: Jan Beulich jbeulich@suse.com Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Tested-by: Jan Beulich jbeulich@suse.com Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- crypto/algapi.c | 1 + crypto/api.c | 1 - 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/crypto/algapi.c +++ b/crypto/algapi.c @@ -1277,3 +1277,4 @@ module_exit(crypto_algapi_exit);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Cryptographic algorithms API"); +MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: cryptomgr"); --- a/crypto/api.c +++ b/crypto/api.c @@ -603,4 +603,3 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_req_done);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Cryptographic core API"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); -MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: cryptomgr");
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 20:14:25 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
5.15.23-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen foxhlchen@gmail.com
On 2/9/22 12:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On 2/9/22 11:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos re@w6rz.net
On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 20:14:25 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.15: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 114 tests: 114 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.15.23-rc1-g722769939d60 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 00:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.15.23-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.15.y * git commit: 722769939d600370e0f75656c6076add1736919a * git describe: v5.15.21-118-g722769939d60 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.21-112-g0472630a5621) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.21-112-g0472630a5621) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.21-112-g0472630a5621) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.21-112-g0472630a5621) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 87812, pass: 74191, fail: 495, skip: 10102, xfail: 824
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed * i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed * mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 52 total, 39 passed, 13 failed * riscv: 24 total, 20 passed, 4 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 62 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 100 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/735 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/739 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/743
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On 2/9/2022 11:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 488 pass: 488 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On 10/02/22 02.14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, gcc 10.2.0) and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, gcc 11.2.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya bagasdotme@gmail.com
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, at 2:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Compiled and booted 5.15.23-rc1 on my x86_64 test system successfully without errors or regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins slade@sladewatkins.com
Thanks, Slade
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Bagas Sanjaya -
Florian Fainelli -
Fox Chen -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Ron Economos -
Shuah Khan -
Slade Watkins -
Sudip Mukherjee