Hi,
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 Clement Leger cleger@kalray.eu wrote:
Index of rvring is computed using pointer arithmetic. However, since rvring->rvdev->vring is the base of the vring array, computation of rvring idx should be reversed. It previously lead to writing at negative indices in the resource table.
Signed-off-by: Clement Leger cleger@kalray.eu
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Randomly stumbled upon this in a list of patches. This patch landed in mainline as:
00a0eec59ddb remoteproc: Fix wrong rvring index computation
Should it be queued up for stable? I'm guessing:
Fixes: c0d631570ad5 ("remoteproc: set vring addresses in resource table")
-Doug
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 04:26:41PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 Clement Leger cleger@kalray.eu wrote:
Index of rvring is computed using pointer arithmetic. However, since rvring->rvdev->vring is the base of the vring array, computation of rvring idx should be reversed. It previously lead to writing at negative indices in the resource table.
Signed-off-by: Clement Leger cleger@kalray.eu
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Randomly stumbled upon this in a list of patches. This patch landed in mainline as:
00a0eec59ddb remoteproc: Fix wrong rvring index computation
Should it be queued up for stable? I'm guessing:
Fixes: c0d631570ad5 ("remoteproc: set vring addresses in resource table")
Thanks, now queued up.
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org