This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.100-rc1
Herbert Xu herbert@gondor.apana.org.au crypto: api - Move cryptomgr soft dependency into algapi
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch scgl@linux.ibm.com KVM: s390: Return error on SIDA memop on normal guest
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++-- arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 ++ crypto/algapi.c | 1 + crypto/api.c | 1 - drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
commit bd2db32e7c3e35bd4d9b8bbff689434a50893546 upstream.
It was reported that the mmc host structure could be accessed after it was freed in moxart_remove(), so fix this by saving the base register of the device and using it instead of the pointer dereference.
Cc: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org Cc: Xiyu Yang xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn Cc: Xin Xiong xiongx18@fudan.edu.cn Cc: Xin Tan tanxin.ctf@gmail.com Cc: Tony Lindgren tony@atomide.com Cc: Yang Li yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: whitehat002 hackyzh002@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127071638.4057899-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.or... Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c @@ -708,12 +708,12 @@ static int moxart_remove(struct platform if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(host->dma_chan_rx)) dma_release_channel(host->dma_chan_rx); mmc_remove_host(mmc); - mmc_free_host(mmc);
writel(0, host->base + REG_INTERRUPT_MASK); writel(0, host->base + REG_POWER_CONTROL); writel(readl(host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL) | CLK_OFF, host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL); + mmc_free_host(mmc);
return 0; }
From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch scgl@linux.ibm.com
commit 2c212e1baedcd782b2535a3f86bc491977677c0e upstream.
Refuse SIDA memops on guests which are not protected. For normal guests, the secure instruction data address designation, which determines the location we access, is not under control of KVM.
Fixes: 19e122776886 (KVM: S390: protvirt: Introduce instruction data area bounce buffer) Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch scgl@linux.ibm.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger borntraeger@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c @@ -4654,6 +4654,8 @@ static long kvm_s390_guest_sida_op(struc return -EINVAL; if (mop->size + mop->sida_offset > sida_size(vcpu->arch.sie_block)) return -E2BIG; + if (!kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu)) + return -EINVAL;
switch (mop->op) { case KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_READ:
From: Herbert Xu herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
commit c6ce9c5831cae515d375a01b97ae1778689acf19 upstream.
The soft dependency on cryptomgr is only needed in algapi because if algapi isn't present then no algorithms can be loaded. This also fixes the case where api is built-in but algapi is built as a module as the soft dependency would otherwise get lost.
Fixes: 8ab23d547f65 ("crypto: api - Add softdep on cryptomgr") Reported-by: Jan Beulich jbeulich@suse.com Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Tested-by: Jan Beulich jbeulich@suse.com Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- crypto/algapi.c | 1 + crypto/api.c | 1 - 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/crypto/algapi.c +++ b/crypto/algapi.c @@ -1295,3 +1295,4 @@ module_exit(crypto_algapi_exit);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Cryptographic algorithms API"); +MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: cryptomgr"); --- a/crypto/api.c +++ b/crypto/api.c @@ -603,4 +603,3 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_req_done);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Cryptographic core API"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); -MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: cryptomgr");
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any new kernel problems here (but we still hit the gmp.h compilation issue):
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On 2/9/22 12:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 20:14:18 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.100-rc1-gf1b074cc52b4 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 00:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.100-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: f1b074cc52b4cb5f2f78985508ae344e6f066252 * git describe: v5.10.98-79-gf1b074cc52b4 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 76874, pass: 66765, fail: 223, skip: 9288, xfail: 598
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed * i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed * mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/734 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/738
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On 2/9/2022 11:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 161 pass: 161 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On 2022/2/10 3:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.100-rc1,
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.100-rc1 Commit: f1b074cc52b4cb5f2f78985508ae344e6f066252 Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9013 passed: 9013 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
x86: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9013 passed: 9013 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot hulkrobot@huawei.com
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, at 2:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Compiled and booted 5.10.100-rc1 on my x86_64 test system successfully without errors or regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins slade@sladewatkins.com
Thanks, Slade
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Florian Fainelli -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Pavel Machek -
Samuel Zou -
Shuah Khan -
Slade Watkins -
Sudip Mukherjee