Driver compares widget name in wsa_macro_spk_boost_event() widget event callback, however it does not handle component's name prefix. This leads to using uninitialized stack variables as registers and register values. Handle gracefully such case.
Fixes: 2c4066e5d428 ("ASoC: codecs: lpass-wsa-macro: add dapm widgets and route") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
---
This is a fix only for uninitialized values case. The fix for including name prefixes will be sent separate, because I think it is not a stable material. Happy to combine patches if needed. --- sound/soc/codecs/lpass-wsa-macro.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/lpass-wsa-macro.c b/sound/soc/codecs/lpass-wsa-macro.c index ec6859ec0d38..ea6e3fa7e9e1 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/lpass-wsa-macro.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/lpass-wsa-macro.c @@ -1685,6 +1685,9 @@ static int wsa_macro_spk_boost_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w, boost_path_cfg1 = CDC_WSA_RX1_RX_PATH_CFG1; reg = CDC_WSA_RX1_RX_PATH_CTL; reg_mix = CDC_WSA_RX1_RX_PATH_MIX_CTL; + } else { + dev_warn(component->dev, "Incorrect widget name in the driver\n"); + return -EINVAL; }
switch (event) {
On Tue, 03 Oct 2023 17:54:22 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
Driver compares widget name in wsa_macro_spk_boost_event() widget event callback, however it does not handle component's name prefix. This leads to using uninitialized stack variables as registers and register values. Handle gracefully such case.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: codecs: wsa-macro: fix uninitialized stack variables with name prefix commit: 72151ad0cba8a07df90130ff62c979520d71f23b
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Krzysztof Kozlowski -
Mark Brown