On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 8:54 PM Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org wrote:
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.11, v4.19.24, v4.14.102, v4.9.159, v4.4.175, v3.18.135.
v4.19.24: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 919d8a3f3fef ("scsi: mpt3sas: Convert uses of pr_<level> with MPT3SAS_FMT to ioc_<level>")
v4.14.102: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 016d5c35e278 ("scsi: mpt3sas: SGL to PRP Translation for I/Os to NVMe devices") 02a386df3678 ("scsi: mpt3sas: open-code _scsih_scsi_lookup_get()") 05303dfb7380 ("scsi: mpt3sas: use list_splice_init()") 12e7c6782bc5 ("scsi: mpt3sas: Introduce mpt3sas_get_st_from_smid()") 182ac784b41f ("scsi: mpt3sas: Introduce Base function for cloning.") 22ae5a3c2599 ("scsi: mpt3sas: Introduce API to get BAR0 mapped buffer address") 494f401bcd07 ("scsi: mpt3sas: Fix sparse warnings") 6a2d4618aef3 ("scsi: mpt3sas: separate out _base_recovery_check()") 6da999fe5a92 ("scsi: mpt3sas: simplify mpt3sas_scsi_issue_tm()") 74fcfa5371b7 ("scsi: mpt3sas: simplify task management functions") 93204b782a88 ("scsi: mpt3sas: Lockless access for chain buffers.") 9961c9bbf2b4 ("scsi: mpt3sas: check command status before attempting abort") aff39e61218f ("scsi: mpt3sas: Added support for nvme encapsulated request message.") b0cd285eb57c ("scsi: mpt3sas: always use first reserved smid for ioctl passthrough") ba4494d47bd0 ("scsi: mpt3sas: set default value for cb_idx") c102e00cf4b8 ("scsi: mpt3sas: API 's to support NVMe drive addition to SML") cd5897eda27d ("scsi: mpt3sas: Fix nvme drives checking for tlr.") d8335ae2b453 ("scsi: mpt3sas: fix dma_addr_t casts") d88e1eaba6ee ("scsi: mpt3sas: Add nvme device support in slave alloc, target alloc and probe") dbec4c9040ed ("scsi: mpt3sas: lockless command submission")
v4.9.159: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 016d5c35e278 ("scsi: mpt3sas: SGL to PRP Translation for I/Os to NVMe devices") 12e7c6782bc5 ("scsi: mpt3sas: Introduce mpt3sas_get_st_from_smid()") 307d9075a02b ("scsi: mpt3sas: Recognize and act on iopriority info") 494f401bcd07 ("scsi: mpt3sas: Fix sparse warnings") 81c16f83231a ("scsi: mpt3sas: Use the new MPI 2.6 32-bit Atomic Request Descriptors for SAS35 devices.") 998f26aedf41 ("scsi: mpt3sas: Added Device ID's for SAS35 devices and updated MPI header.") aff39e61218f ("scsi: mpt3sas: Added support for nvme encapsulated request message.") b0cd285eb57c ("scsi: mpt3sas: always use first reserved smid for ioctl passthrough") ba4494d47bd0 ("scsi: mpt3sas: set default value for cb_idx") c696f7b83ede ("scsi: mpt3sas: Implement device_remove_in_progress check in IOCTL path") d8335ae2b453 ("scsi: mpt3sas: fix dma_addr_t casts") dbec4c9040ed ("scsi: mpt3sas: lockless command submission")
v4.4.175: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 016d5c35e278 ("scsi: mpt3sas: SGL to PRP Translation for I/Os to NVMe devices") 12e7c6782bc5 ("scsi: mpt3sas: Introduce mpt3sas_get_st_from_smid()") 30158dc9bbc9 ("mpt3sas: Never block the Enclosure device") 307d9075a02b ("scsi: mpt3sas: Recognize and act on iopriority info") 5f0dfb7a9bcc ("mpt3sas: Used "synchronize_irq()"API to synchronize timed-out IO & TMs") 6c197093847e ("mpt3sas: Set maximum transfer length per IO to 4MB for VDs") 81c16f83231a ("scsi: mpt3sas: Use the new MPI 2.6 32-bit Atomic Request Descriptors for SAS35 devices.") 8bbb1cf63f5e ("mpt3sas: Fix warnings exposed by W=1") 998f26aedf41 ("scsi: mpt3sas: Added Device ID's for SAS35 devices and updated MPI header.") aff39e61218f ("scsi: mpt3sas: Added support for nvme encapsulated request message.") b0cd285eb57c ("scsi: mpt3sas: always use first reserved smid for ioctl passthrough") b130b0d56fa9 ("mpt3sas: Added support for high port count HBA variants.") ba4494d47bd0 ("scsi: mpt3sas: set default value for cb_idx") c696f7b83ede ("scsi: mpt3sas: Implement device_remove_in_progress check in IOCTL path") d8335ae2b453 ("scsi: mpt3sas: fix dma_addr_t casts") dbec4c9040ed ("scsi: mpt3sas: lockless command submission") fd0331b32826 ("mpt3sas: Make use of additional HighPriority credit message frames for sending SCSI IO's")
v3.18.135: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 03d1fb3a6578 ("mpt3sas: Fix for Asynchronous completion of timedout IO and task abort of timedout IO.") 12e7c6782bc5 ("scsi: mpt3sas: Introduce mpt3sas_get_st_from_smid()") 2b89669ae4ad ("mpt3sas: Bump mpt3sas driver version to v6.100.00.00") 2e26c3853206 ("mpt3sas: Update MPI2 strings to MPI2.5") 2ecb204d07ac ("scsi: always assign block layer tags if enabled") 3c5866565f37 ("mpt2sas: Use mpi headers from mpt3sas") 7497392a1193 ("mpt3sas: Move Gen3 HBA's device registration to a separate file") 7786ab6aff9c ("mpt3sas: Ported WarpDrive product SSS6200 support") 78f97c8f612d ("mpt2sas: Move Gen2 HBA's device registration to a separate file") 8a7e4c24e08f ("mpt3sas: Added mpt2sas driver definitions") 8f88dc41927f ("mptfusion: don't change queue type in ->change_queue_depth") a03bd153b1b3 ("mpt2sas, mpt3sas: Update attribution language to Avago") a62182f338b3 ("scsi: provide a generic change_queue_type method") ad666a0f41d9 ("mpt2sas, mpt3sas: fix upper bound for the module parameter max_sgl_entries") c75683ca13d1 ("mpt3sas : Bump mpt3sas driver version to 9.100.00.00") c8b09f6fb67d ("scsi: don't set tagging state from scsi_adjust_queue_depth") cb16ef384f15 ("mpt2sas: MPI2 Rev AA (2.00.19) specifications") cf75d5d6aa91 ("mpt3sas: simplify ->change_queue_depth") d357e84d65df ("mpt3sas: Define 'hba_mpi_version_belonged' IOC variable") d42432ad6c5c ("mpt2sas: MPI2 Rev BB (2.00.20) specification and 2.00.35 header files") db5ed4dfd5dd ("scsi: drop reason argument from ->change_queue_depth") dbec4c9040ed ("scsi: mpt3sas: lockless command submission") f9d81cfc2315 ("mpt3sas: Bump mpt3sas Driver version to v5.100.00.00") fb77bb5376a5 ("mpt3sas: Added Combined Reply Queue feature to extend up-to 96 MSIX vector support")
How should we proceed with this patch?
Shall I prepare the patches against all the above stable kernels and shall I post them individually? if yes then how should I mention that the particular is for corresponding stable kernel?
Thanks, Sreekanth
-- Thanks, Sasha
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org