All the managed resources would be freed by the time release function is invoked. Handling such memory in qcom_smd_edge_release() would do bad things.
Found this issue while testing Audio usecase where the dsp is started up and shutdown in a loop.
This patch fixes this issue by using simple kzalloc for allocating channel->name and channel which is then freed in qcom_smd_edge_release().
Without this patch restarting a remoteproc would crash the system. Fixes: 53e2822e56c7 ("rpmsg: Introduce Qualcomm SMD backend") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org --- drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c index 5ce9bf7b897d..49d3838dfc3d 100644 --- a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c @@ -1100,12 +1100,12 @@ static struct qcom_smd_channel *qcom_smd_create_channel(struct qcom_smd_edge *ed void *info; int ret;
- channel = devm_kzalloc(&edge->dev, sizeof(*channel), GFP_KERNEL); + channel = kzalloc(sizeof(*channel), GFP_KERNEL); if (!channel) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
channel->edge = edge; - channel->name = devm_kstrdup(&edge->dev, name, GFP_KERNEL); + channel->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL); if (!channel->name) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -1156,8 +1156,8 @@ static struct qcom_smd_channel *qcom_smd_create_channel(struct qcom_smd_edge *ed return channel;
free_name_and_channel: - devm_kfree(&edge->dev, channel->name); - devm_kfree(&edge->dev, channel); + kfree(channel->name); + kfree(channel);
return ERR_PTR(ret); } @@ -1380,11 +1380,13 @@ static void qcom_smd_edge_release(struct device *dev) { struct qcom_smd_channel *channel; struct qcom_smd_edge *edge = to_smd_edge(dev); + struct list_head *this, *tmp;
- list_for_each_entry(channel, &edge->channels, list) { - SET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, state, SMD_CHANNEL_CLOSED); - SET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, head, 0); - SET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, tail, 0); + list_for_each_safe(this, tmp, &edge->channels) { + channel = list_entry(this, struct qcom_smd_channel, list); + list_del(&channel->list); + kfree(channel->name); + kfree(channel); }
kfree(edge);
On Fri 01 Jun 16:32 PDT 2018, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
@@ -1380,11 +1380,13 @@ static void qcom_smd_edge_release(struct device *dev) { struct qcom_smd_channel *channel; struct qcom_smd_edge *edge = to_smd_edge(dev);
- struct list_head *this, *tmp;
- list_for_each_entry(channel, &edge->channels, list) {
SET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, state, SMD_CHANNEL_CLOSED);
SET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, head, 0);
SET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, tail, 0);
- list_for_each_safe(this, tmp, &edge->channels) {
channel = list_entry(this, struct qcom_smd_channel, list);
Is there a reason not to use list_for_each_entry_safe()?
list_del(&channel->list);
kfree(channel->name);
kfree(channel);
Regards, Bjorn
On 04/06/18 01:49, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Fri 01 Jun 16:32 PDT 2018, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
@@ -1380,11 +1380,13 @@ static void qcom_smd_edge_release(struct device *dev) { struct qcom_smd_channel *channel; struct qcom_smd_edge *edge = to_smd_edge(dev);
- struct list_head *this, *tmp;
- list_for_each_entry(channel, &edge->channels, list) {
SET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, state, SMD_CHANNEL_CLOSED);
SET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, head, 0);
SET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, tail, 0);
- list_for_each_safe(this, tmp, &edge->channels) {
channel = list_entry(this, struct qcom_smd_channel, list);
Is there a reason not to use list_for_each_entry_safe()?
No, I will respin the patch with this change. thanks, srini
list_del(&channel->list);
kfree(channel->name);
kfree(channel);
Regards, Bjorn
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org