The commit 391d4ee568b5 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") introduces the following warning messages.
*WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in memfd_wait_for_pins*
It is because we still use radix_tree_deref_slot without read_rcu_lock. We should use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected instead in the case.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 391d4ee568b5 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") Signed-off-by: zhong jiang zhongjiang@huawei.com --- mm/shmem.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c index 5b2cc9f9b1f1..e55aa460a2c0 100644 --- a/mm/shmem.c +++ b/mm/shmem.c @@ -2664,7 +2664,7 @@ static void shmem_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping)
spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &mapping->page_tree, &iter, start) { - page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot); + page = radix_tree_deref_slot_protected(slot, &mapping->tree_lock); if (!page || radix_tree_exception(page)) { if (radix_tree_deref_retry(page)) { slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter);
The commit 99b45e7a1ba1 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") introduces the following warning messages.
*WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in memfd_wait_for_pins*
It is because we still use radix_tree_deref_slot without read_rcu_lock. We should use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected instead in the case.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 99b45e7a1ba1 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") Signed-off-by: zhong jiang zhongjiang@huawei.com --- mm/memfd.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c index 5859705dafe1..9e68a4320a0e 100644 --- a/mm/memfd.c +++ b/mm/memfd.c @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static void memfd_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping)
xa_lock_irq(&mapping->i_pages); radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &mapping->i_pages, &iter, start) { - page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot); + page = radix_tree_deref_slot_protected(slot, &mapping->i_pages.xa_lock); if (!page || radix_tree_exception(page)) { if (radix_tree_deref_retry(page)) { slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter);
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:26:08AM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
The commit 99b45e7a1ba1 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") introduces the following warning messages.
*WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in memfd_wait_for_pins*
It is because we still use radix_tree_deref_slot without read_rcu_lock. We should use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected instead in the case.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 99b45e7a1ba1 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") Signed-off-by: zhong jiang zhongjiang@huawei.com
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) willy@infradead.org
The commit eb4058d8daf8 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") introduces the following warning messages.
*WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in memfd_wait_for_pins*
It is because we still use radix_tree_deref_slot without read_rcu_lock. We should use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected instead in the case.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: eb4058d8daf8 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") Signed-off-by: zhong jiang zhongjiang@huawei.com --- mm/shmem.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c index 62668379623b..e40239bf6dfe 100644 --- a/mm/shmem.c +++ b/mm/shmem.c @@ -1862,7 +1862,7 @@ static void shmem_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping) spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); restart: radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &mapping->page_tree, &iter, start) { - page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot); + page = radix_tree_deref_slot_protected(slot, &mapping->tree_lock); if (!page || radix_tree_exception(page)) { if (radix_tree_deref_retry(page)) goto restart;
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:26:09AM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
The commit eb4058d8daf8 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") introduces the following warning messages.
*WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in memfd_wait_for_pins*
It is because we still use radix_tree_deref_slot without read_rcu_lock. We should use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected instead in the case.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: eb4058d8daf8 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") Signed-off-by: zhong jiang zhongjiang@huawei.com
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) willy@infradead.org
The commit 3ce6b467b9b2 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") introduces the following warning messages.
*WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in memfd_wait_for_pins*
It is because we still use radix_tree_deref_slot without read_rcu_lock. We should use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected instead in the case.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 3ce6b467b9b2 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") Signed-off-by: zhong jiang zhongjiang@huawei.com --- mm/shmem.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c index ac8a5fedc245..6266a7d1ba00 100644 --- a/mm/shmem.c +++ b/mm/shmem.c @@ -2464,7 +2464,7 @@ static void shmem_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping)
spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &mapping->page_tree, &iter, start) { - page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot); + page = radix_tree_deref_slot_protected(slot, &mapping->tree_lock); if (!page || radix_tree_exception(page)) { if (radix_tree_deref_retry(page)) { slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter);
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:26:10AM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
The commit 3ce6b467b9b2 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") introduces the following warning messages.
*WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in memfd_wait_for_pins*
It is because we still use radix_tree_deref_slot without read_rcu_lock. We should use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected instead in the case.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 3ce6b467b9b2 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") Signed-off-by: zhong jiang zhongjiang@huawei.com
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) willy@infradead.org
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:26:07AM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
The commit 391d4ee568b5 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") introduces the following warning messages.
*WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in memfd_wait_for_pins*
It is because we still use radix_tree_deref_slot without read_rcu_lock. We should use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected instead in the case.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 391d4ee568b5 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") Signed-off-by: zhong jiang zhongjiang@huawei.com
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) willy@infradead.org
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org