Hi,
would you mind backporting that patch to stables (at least 5.10 and 6.1 are relevant for Debian)?
Thanks in advance!
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Salvatore Bonaccorso carnil@debian.org Message-ID: ZNXJui6POZ8Wb6lp@eldamar.lan Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 07:40:10 +0200 Subject: Re: Bug#1043437: linux: report microcode upgrade *from* version as well
Source: linux Source-Version: 6.3.1-1~exp1
Hi Thorsten,
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 07:23:57AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Package: src:linux Version: 5.10.179-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: tg@mirbsd.de
I have this in dmesg:
[ 0.000000] microcode: microcode updated early to revision 0xa4, date = 2010-10-02
It would be very nice if this message also showed the revision *from* which it was upgraded, so that info is available without going through extra hoops to boot without �code upgrade.
This is fixed upstream in a9a5cac225b0 ("x86/microcode/intel: Print old and new revision during early boot") in 6.3-rc1, but not sure it will have changes to get backported to stable series upstream.
Would you mind trying to get that applied in the needed stable series?
Regards, Salvatore
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 07:44:06PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Hi,
would you mind backporting that patch to stables (at least 5.10 and 6.1 are relevant for Debian)?
Can you provide a working version of the commit? As-is, it does not apply cleanly, so obviously has never even been tested on those kernel trees.
thanks,
greg k-h
Greg KH dixit:
would you mind backporting that patch to stables (at least 5.10 and 6.1 are relevant for Debian)?
Can you provide a working version of the commit? As-is, it does not apply cleanly, so obviously has never even been tested on those kernel trees.
Ouch. Sorry, nowhere even near the resources for that rn :/
bye, //mirabilos
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org