HI Greg,

On 02-03-21, 11:02, Greg KH wrote:

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:25:09PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:

...

Hi Greg,

Please include these commits for 5.11 stable series

9a8b9434c60f phy: mediatek: Add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() 25e3ee590f62 phy: phy-brcm-sata: remove unneeded semicolon 6b46e60a6943 phy: USB_LGM_PHY should depend on X86 36acd5e24e30 phy: lantiq: rcu-usb2: wait after clock enable c188365402f6 phy: rockchip: emmc, add vendor prefix to dts properties 88d9f40c4b71 devicetree: phy: rockchip-emmc optional add vendor prefix aaf316de3bba phy: cpcap-usb: remove unneeded conversion to bool 39961bd6b70e phy: rockchip-emmc: emmc_phy_init() always return 0

Why take these?

What problems do they solve?

Sorry I should have provided the context. I had sent these as fixes for 5.11 but that was bit late so we merged it for 5.12 [1]

How does 25e3ee590f62 meet the stable tree rules?

...

Please note that below commit is applicable for 5.7+ 36acd5e24e30 phy: lantiq: rcu-usb2: wait after clock enable

So for 5.10 also?

yes, the patch has been tagged stable 5.7+

Thanks

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210210091249.GC2774@vkoul-mobl.Dlink/

On 02-03-21, 11:41, Greg KH wrote:

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:55:27PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:

...

HI Greg,

On 02-03-21, 11:02, Greg KH wrote:

...

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:25:09PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:

...

Hi Greg,

Please include these commits for 5.11 stable series

9a8b9434c60f phy: mediatek: Add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() 25e3ee590f62 phy: phy-brcm-sata: remove unneeded semicolon 6b46e60a6943 phy: USB_LGM_PHY should depend on X86 36acd5e24e30 phy: lantiq: rcu-usb2: wait after clock enable c188365402f6 phy: rockchip: emmc, add vendor prefix to dts properties 88d9f40c4b71 devicetree: phy: rockchip-emmc optional add vendor prefix aaf316de3bba phy: cpcap-usb: remove unneeded conversion to bool 39961bd6b70e phy: rockchip-emmc: emmc_phy_init() always return 0

Why take these?

What problems do they solve?

Sorry I should have provided the context. I had sent these as fixes for 5.11 but that was bit late so we merged it for 5.12 [1]

I still do not have any context :(

Please see the discussion we had in https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210210091249.GC2774@vkoul-mobl.Dlink/

...

...

How does 25e3ee590f62 meet the stable tree rules?

Sorry it doesn't. My mistake on picking this for fixes. Lets drop this one

And all of these really are needed for stable? Again, how does this above commit qualify?

I relooked, expect this one, rest should be added for 5.11 stable.

Thanks

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 01:25:03PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 05:46:59PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:

...

On 02-03-21, 11:41, Greg KH wrote:

...

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:55:27PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:

...

HI Greg,

On 02-03-21, 11:02, Greg KH wrote:

...

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:25:09PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:

...

Hi Greg,

Please include these commits for 5.11 stable series

9a8b9434c60f phy: mediatek: Add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() 25e3ee590f62 phy: phy-brcm-sata: remove unneeded semicolon 6b46e60a6943 phy: USB_LGM_PHY should depend on X86 36acd5e24e30 phy: lantiq: rcu-usb2: wait after clock enable c188365402f6 phy: rockchip: emmc, add vendor prefix to dts properties 88d9f40c4b71 devicetree: phy: rockchip-emmc optional add vendor prefix aaf316de3bba phy: cpcap-usb: remove unneeded conversion to bool 39961bd6b70e phy: rockchip-emmc: emmc_phy_init() always return 0

Why take these?

What problems do they solve?

Sorry I should have provided the context. I had sent these as fixes for 5.11 but that was bit late so we merged it for 5.12 [1]

I still do not have any context :(

Please see the discussion we had in https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210210091249.GC2774@vkoul-mobl.Dlink/

All that means is that you felt some of these needed to go into 5.11 but did not make it. That does not mean that all of the above qualifies for stable backporting, correct?

So can I have a list of ids, in the order in which they should be applied, that you feel should go into 5.11, and any other older stable releases?

And again, not all of the above are relevant for stable kernels, and some have already been applied, so a list of needed patches would be most helpful here.

thanks,

greg k-h