Consider picking up "scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression" for stable
Hi Greg. From https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217215 it looks like you want to add be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression") to your stable queue. It lacks a stable tag, but fixes a bug in a commit that afaics was backported to all stable series last week.
Side note: would you scripts have noticed this automatically and added it to the queue today? (Just wondering if this mail actually makes any difference.)
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
On 20.03.23 07:19, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
Hi Greg. From https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217215 it looks like you want to add be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression") to your stable queue. It lacks a stable tag, but fixes a bug in a commit that afaics was backported to all stable series last week.
Side note: would you scripts have noticed this automatically and added it to the queue today? (Just wondering if this mail actually makes any difference.)
Sorry, ignore that, I noticed that fix is already in your queue (I looked at it before writing that mail, but it seems I somehow missed it and only noticed now; sorry for the noise).
Ciao, Thorsten
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 07:45:04AM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
On 20.03.23 07:19, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
Hi Greg. From https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217215 it looks like you want to add be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression") to your stable queue. It lacks a stable tag, but fixes a bug in a commit that afaics was backported to all stable series last week.
Side note: would you scripts have noticed this automatically and added it to the queue today? (Just wondering if this mail actually makes any difference.)
Sorry, ignore that, I noticed that fix is already in your queue (I looked at it before writing that mail, but it seems I somehow missed it and only noticed now; sorry for the noise).
It's not noise, verifying that we actually picked up known fixes is good, I'd much rather a few "do you really have this fix" emails get sent than not sent at all and we miss things.
And I just checked, yes, if Sasha hadn't picked this up with his scripts, my scripts would have caught it as well, so it was a good test that our independant processes are working.
thanks,
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Greg KH -
Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)