When looking up the clock we must use the client->dev as device since that is the one which is probed via DT.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@ti.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 7e2e6c5758de9 ("mfd: twl-core: Do not create dummy pdata when booted with DT") --- drivers/mfd/twl-core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c index d3133a371e27..c649344fd7f2 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c @@ -1177,7 +1177,7 @@ twl_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id) twl_priv->ready = true;
/* setup clock framework */ - clocks_init(&pdev->dev, pdata ? pdata->clock : NULL); + clocks_init(&client->dev, pdata ? pdata->clock : NULL);
/* read TWL IDCODE Register */ if (twl_class_is_4030()) {
On 04/05/2018 02:46 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
When looking up the clock we must use the client->dev as device since that is the one which is probed via DT.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@ti.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 7e2e6c5758de9 ("mfd: twl-core: Do not create dummy pdata when booted with DT")
This is not correct, we should only apply it to v4.16 since things worked before that with the drivers/clk/ti/clk-3xxx.c and drivers/clk/ti/clk-3xxx-legacy.c
Switching device to look for the fck might fail in pre 4.16.
But if this is the case then we might want to rename the fck clock to the correct hfclk.
On top of this patch a DT patch for the affected boards will be needed after 4.16 to define the hfclk clock (or if we do not rename it, the fck).
I'll send a v2 on Monday, but would like to hear your opinion on renaming fck to hfclk from 4.16 onwards (and update the documentation as well). The DT lookup is broken anyways w/o a patch similar to this.
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: 7e2e6c5758de mfd: twl-core: Do not create dummy pdata when booted with DT.
The bot has also determined it's probably a bug fixing patch. (score: 99.0131)
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16, v4.15.15, v4.14.32, v4.9.92, v4.4.126.
v4.16: Build OK! v4.15.15: Build OK! v4.14.32: Build OK! v4.9.92: Build OK! v4.4.126: Build OK!
-- Thanks, Sasha
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Peter Ujfalusi -
Sasha Levin