The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 6.11-stable tree.

I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst.

I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to stable@vger.kernel.org and let me know why this patch should be applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be seen again.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 164f66de6bb6ef454893f193c898dc8f1da6d18b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chunyan Zhang zhangchunyan@iscas.ac.cn Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:41:39 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] riscv: Remove duplicated GET_RM

The macro GET_RM defined twice in this file, one can be removed.

Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti alexghiti@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang zhangchunyan@iscas.ac.cn Fixes: 956d705dd279 ("riscv: Unaligned load/store handling for M_MODE") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241008094141.549248-3-zhangchunyan@iscas.ac.cn Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt palmer@rivosinc.com

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c index d4fd8af7aaf5..1b9867136b61 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c @@ -136,8 +136,6 @@ #define REG_PTR(insn, pos, regs) \ (ulong *)((ulong)(regs) + REG_OFFSET(insn, pos))

-#define GET_RM(insn) (((insn) >> 12) & 7) - #define GET_RS1(insn, regs) (*REG_PTR(insn, SH_RS1, regs)) #define GET_RS2(insn, regs) (*REG_PTR(insn, SH_RS2, regs)) #define GET_RS1S(insn, regs) (*REG_PTR(RVC_RS1S(insn), 0, regs))