As it may return NULL pointer and cause NULL pointer dereference. Add check for the return value of alloc_ordered_workqueue.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 10e5e37581fc ("scsi: ufs: Add clock ungating to a separate workqueue") Signed-off-by: Ma Ke make24@iscas.ac.cn --- drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c index 5e3c67e96956..41842f2cd454 100644 --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c @@ -2139,6 +2139,8 @@ static void ufshcd_init_clk_gating(struct ufs_hba *hba) hba->host->host_no); hba->clk_gating.clk_gating_workq = alloc_ordered_workqueue(wq_name, WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI); + if (!hba->clk_gating.clk_gating_workq) + return;
ufshcd_init_clk_gating_sysfs(hba);
On 8/7/24 10:54 PM, Ma Ke wrote:
As it may return NULL pointer and cause NULL pointer dereference. Add check for the return value of alloc_ordered_workqueue.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 10e5e37581fc ("scsi: ufs: Add clock ungating to a separate workqueue") Signed-off-by: Ma Ke make24@iscas.ac.cn
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c index 5e3c67e96956..41842f2cd454 100644 --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c @@ -2139,6 +2139,8 @@ static void ufshcd_init_clk_gating(struct ufs_hba *hba) hba->host->host_no); hba->clk_gating.clk_gating_workq = alloc_ordered_workqueue(wq_name, WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI);
- if (!hba->clk_gating.clk_gating_workq)
return;
ufshcd_init_clk_gating_sysfs(hba);
This patch doesn't solve anything since hba->clk_gating.clk_gating_workq is not used in ufshcd_init_clk_gating() after that workqueue has been created. Additionally, this patch doesn't prevent that the UFS driver will attempt to queue work on hba->clk_gating.clk_gating_workq if allocation of that workqueue fails. If it would be possible to vote on Linux kernel patches, my vote would be -2.
Bart.
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org