I'm announcing the release of the 4.19.157 kernel.
Please see the 5.9.8 announcement if you are curious if you should upgrade or not: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1605041246232108@kroah.com/
The updated 4.19.y git tree can be found at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git linux-4.19.y and can be browsed at the normal kernel.org git web browser: https://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git%3Ba=summa...
thanks,
greg k-h
------------
Makefile | 2 +- drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Greg Kroah-Hartman (1): Linux 4.19.157
Len Brown (1): powercap: restrict energy meter to root access
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 82891b34e19e..245bcd8dd7b7 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 VERSION = 4 PATCHLEVEL = 19 -SUBLEVEL = 156 +SUBLEVEL = 157 EXTRAVERSION = NAME = "People's Front"
diff --git a/drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c b/drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c index 9e2f274bd44f..60c8375c3c81 100644 --- a/drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c +++ b/drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c @@ -379,9 +379,9 @@ static void create_power_zone_common_attributes( &dev_attr_max_energy_range_uj.attr; if (power_zone->ops->get_energy_uj) { if (power_zone->ops->reset_energy_uj) - dev_attr_energy_uj.attr.mode = S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO; + dev_attr_energy_uj.attr.mode = S_IWUSR | S_IRUSR; else - dev_attr_energy_uj.attr.mode = S_IRUGO; + dev_attr_energy_uj.attr.mode = S_IRUSR; power_zone->zone_dev_attrs[count++] = &dev_attr_energy_uj.attr; }
Hi!
I'm announcing the release of the 4.19.157 kernel.
Please see the 5.9.8 announcement if you are curious if you should upgrade or not: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1605041246232108@kroah.com/
Quoting:
# Hint, if you are using SGX, then upgrade. And then possibly # reconsider # the decisions you have recently made that caused you to write special # code to use that crazy thing. Personally, it still feels like a # solution in search of a problem.
I agree with you that SGX is "crazy", but this makes no sense.
SGX is expected to protect enclave even from root. How does making interface root-only solve that?
Plus, SGX is not in 4.19. I don't believe it is in mainline, either, as the patches are still reposted. We are at v40 now...
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 16:54:06 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com Subject: [PATCH v40 00/24] Intel SGX foundations
ls arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx shows nothing in mainline. It shows nothing in -next, either.
Confused, Pavel
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Pavel Machek