On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 06:40:06AM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:30:10AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:

...

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 01:33:35AM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:

...

Hi Finn Thain.

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 3.6525)

The bot has tested the following trees: v4.15.15, v4.14.32, v4.9.92, v4.4.126,

v4.15.15: Build OK! v4.14.32: Build OK! v4.9.92: Build OK! v4.4.126: Build OK!

Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree.

Did this bot respond to the whole series here, or the 00/12 patch? :)

I'm experimenting with an idea that involves squashing a series of commits into a single commit and running it through the NN that way.

I figured it might make sense since when people mail patches this way there's usually dependencies between them, so if a random patch in the series got tagged for stable, we'll need to bring in the rest of the series as well.

So yes, in this case the entire series was identified by the NN as stable material. You can also see that there are separate mails for individual patches in the series - they acts as a sort of a fallback saying "maybe you don't want the whole series, but consider these as individual patches" (also gives a hint as to why the entire series was selected).

Ah, very nice stuff! Thanks for the explaination.

greg k-h