The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 1aee9158bc978f91701c5992e395efbc6da2de3c # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to 'stable@vger.kernel.org' --in-reply-to '2023102701-cadet-groovy-9672@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 1aee9158bc978f91701c5992e395efbc6da2de3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 21:34:40 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] nfsd: lock_rename() needs both directories to live on the same fs
... checking that after lock_rename() is too late. Incidentally, NFSv2 had no nfserr_xdev...
Fixes: aa387d6ce153 "nfsd: fix EXDEV checking in rename" Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.9+ Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton jlayton@kernel.org Acked-by: Chuck Lever chuck.lever@oracle.com Tested-by: Jeff Layton jlayton@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Al Viro viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c index 48260cf68fde..02f5fcaad03f 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c @@ -1788,6 +1788,12 @@ nfsd_rename(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *ffhp, char *fname, int flen, if (!flen || isdotent(fname, flen) || !tlen || isdotent(tname, tlen)) goto out;
+ err = (rqstp->rq_vers == 2) ? nfserr_acces : nfserr_xdev; + if (ffhp->fh_export->ex_path.mnt != tfhp->fh_export->ex_path.mnt) + goto out; + if (ffhp->fh_export->ex_path.dentry != tfhp->fh_export->ex_path.dentry) + goto out; + retry: host_err = fh_want_write(ffhp); if (host_err) { @@ -1823,12 +1829,6 @@ nfsd_rename(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *ffhp, char *fname, int flen, if (ndentry == trap) goto out_dput_new;
- host_err = -EXDEV; - if (ffhp->fh_export->ex_path.mnt != tfhp->fh_export->ex_path.mnt) - goto out_dput_new; - if (ffhp->fh_export->ex_path.dentry != tfhp->fh_export->ex_path.dentry) - goto out_dput_new; - if ((ndentry->d_sb->s_export_op->flags & EXPORT_OP_CLOSE_BEFORE_UNLINK) && nfsd_has_cached_files(ndentry)) { close_cached = true;
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 02:18:01PM +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
Trivial context change in that one, really. The if (...) following the second chunk has changed; git cherry-pick is unhappy about it. See below for rebased diff (identical to the original except for the post-chunk context):
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c index b6f4b552c9af..6aa968bee0ce 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c @@ -1689,6 +1689,12 @@ nfsd_rename(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *ffhp, char *fname, int flen, if (!flen || isdotent(fname, flen) || !tlen || isdotent(tname, tlen)) goto out;
+ err = (rqstp->rq_vers == 2) ? nfserr_acces : nfserr_xdev; + if (ffhp->fh_export->ex_path.mnt != tfhp->fh_export->ex_path.mnt) + goto out; + if (ffhp->fh_export->ex_path.dentry != tfhp->fh_export->ex_path.dentry) + goto out; + retry: host_err = fh_want_write(ffhp); if (host_err) { @@ -1723,12 +1729,6 @@ nfsd_rename(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *ffhp, char *fname, int flen, if (ndentry == trap) goto out_dput_new;
- host_err = -EXDEV; - if (ffhp->fh_export->ex_path.mnt != tfhp->fh_export->ex_path.mnt) - goto out_dput_new; - if (ffhp->fh_export->ex_path.dentry != tfhp->fh_export->ex_path.dentry) - goto out_dput_new; - if (nfsd_has_cached_files(ndentry)) { has_cached = true; goto out_dput_old;
On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 02:50:32AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 02:18:01PM +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
Trivial context change in that one, really. The if (...) following the second chunk has changed; git cherry-pick is unhappy about it. See below for rebased diff (identical to the original except for the post-chunk context):
Thanks, all now queued up.
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org