This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

ptr_ring: add barriers

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git%3Ba=su...

The filename of the patch is: ptr_ring-add-barriers.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know about it.

From foo@baz Sun Dec 31 11:12:48 CET 2017

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" mst@redhat.com Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:29:37 +0200 Subject: ptr_ring: add barriers

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" mst@redhat.com

[ Upstream commit a8ceb5dbfde1092b466936bca0ff3be127ecf38e ]

Users of ptr_ring expect that it's safe to give the data structure a pointer and have it be available to consumers, but that actually requires an smb_wmb or a stronger barrier.

In absence of such barriers and on architectures that reorder writes, consumer might read an un=initialized value from an skb pointer stored in the skb array. This was observed causing crashes.

To fix, add memory barriers. The barrier we use is a wmb, the assumption being that producers do not need to read the value so we do not need to order these reads.

Reported-by: George Cherian george.cherian@cavium.com Suggested-by: Jason Wang jasowang@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin mst@redhat.com Acked-by: Jason Wang jasowang@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- include/linux/ptr_ring.h | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

--- a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h +++ b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h @@ -101,12 +101,18 @@ static inline bool ptr_ring_full_bh(stru

/* Note: callers invoking this in a loop must use a compiler barrier, * for example cpu_relax(). Callers must hold producer_lock. + * Callers are responsible for making sure pointer that is being queued + * points to a valid data. */ static inline int __ptr_ring_produce(struct ptr_ring *r, void *ptr) { if (unlikely(!r->size) || r->queue[r->producer]) return -ENOSPC;

+ /* Make sure the pointer we are storing points to a valid data. */ + /* Pairs with smp_read_barrier_depends in __ptr_ring_consume. */ + smp_wmb(); + r->queue[r->producer++] = ptr; if (unlikely(r->producer >= r->size)) r->producer = 0; @@ -275,6 +281,9 @@ static inline void *__ptr_ring_consume(s if (ptr) __ptr_ring_discard_one(r);

+ /* Make sure anyone accessing data through the pointer is up to date. */ + /* Pairs with smp_wmb in __ptr_ring_produce. */ + smp_read_barrier_depends(); return ptr; }

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from mst@redhat.com are

queue-4.14/ptr_ring-add-barriers.patch