Hello Quentin,

On Wednesday, October 29, 2025 14:50 CET, Quentin Schulz foss+kernel@0leil.net wrote:

From: Quentin Schulz quentin.schulz@cherry.de

In commit 296602b8e5f7 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Move RK3399 OPPs to dtsi files for SoC variants"), everything shared between variants of RK3399 was put into rk3399-base.dtsi and the rest in variant-specific DTSI, such as rk3399-t, rk3399-op1, rk3399, etc. Therefore, the variant-specific DTSI should include rk3399-base.dtsi and not another variant's DTSI.

rk3399-op1 wrongly includes rk3399 (a variant) DTSI instead of rk3399-base DTSI, let's fix this oversight by including the intended DTSI.

Fortunately, this had no impact on the resulting DTB since all nodes were named the same and all node properties were overridden in rk3399-op1.dtsi. This was checked by doing a checksum of rk3399-op1 DTBs before and after this commit.

No intended change in behavior.

Thank you for spotting this issue and for fixing it! That was an honest oversight on my part, but it actually resulted in no ill effects, which is the main reason why and how it managed to slip by originally.

Your description of the issue is pretty much perfect, so I've got nothing else to add but

Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic dsimic@manjaro.org

Fixes: 296602b8e5f7 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Move RK3399 OPPs to dtsi files for SoC variants") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz quentin.schulz@cherry.de

---

arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-op1.dtsi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-op1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-op1.dtsi index c4f4f1ff6117b..9da6fd82e46b2 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-op1.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-op1.dtsi @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@

• Copyright (c) 2016-2017 Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd

*/ -#include "rk3399.dtsi" +#include "rk3399-base.dtsi" / { cluster0_opp: opp-table-0 {