This series provides a couple of manually backported mmc changes that fixes some busy detect issues, for a couple of mmc host drivers (sdhci-tegra|omap).
Ulf Hansson (5): mmc: core: Allow host controllers to require R1B for CMD6 mmc: core: Respect MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY for erase/trim/discard mmc: core: Respect MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY for eMMC sleep command mmc: sdhci-omap: Fix busy detection by enabling MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY mmc: sdhci-tegra: Fix busy detection by enabling MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY
drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 5 ++++- drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 7 +++++-- drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 8 +++++--- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c | 3 +++ drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 3 +++ include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 + 6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
[ Upstream commit 1292e3efb149ee21d8d33d725eeed4e6b1ade963 ]
It has turned out that some host controllers can't use R1B for CMD6 and other commands that have R1B associated with them. Therefore invent a new host cap, MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY to let them specify this.
In __mmc_switch(), let's check the flag and use it to prevent R1B responses from being converted into R1. Note that, this also means that the host are on its own, when it comes to manage the busy timeout.
Suggested-by: Sowjanya Komatineni skomatineni@nvidia.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: Anders Roxell anders.roxell@linaro.org Tested-by: Sowjanya Komatineni skomatineni@nvidia.com Tested-by: Faiz Abbas faiz_abbas@ti.com Tested-By: Peter Geis pgwipeout@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org --- drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 8 +++++--- include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c index 09113b9ad679..18a7afb2a5b2 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c @@ -538,10 +538,12 @@ int __mmc_switch(struct mmc_card *card, u8 set, u8 index, u8 value, * If the cmd timeout and the max_busy_timeout of the host are both * specified, let's validate them. A failure means we need to prevent * the host from doing hw busy detection, which is done by converting - * to a R1 response instead of a R1B. + * to a R1 response instead of a R1B. Note, some hosts requires R1B, + * which also means they are on their own when it comes to deal with the + * busy timeout. */ - if (timeout_ms && host->max_busy_timeout && - (timeout_ms > host->max_busy_timeout)) + if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY) && timeout_ms && + host->max_busy_timeout && (timeout_ms > host->max_busy_timeout)) use_r1b_resp = false;
cmd.opcode = MMC_SWITCH; diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h index ba703384bea0..4c5eb3aa8e72 100644 --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h @@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ struct mmc_host { MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR50 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104 | \ MMC_CAP_UHS_DDR50) #define MMC_CAP_SYNC_RUNTIME_PM (1 << 21) /* Synced runtime PM suspends. */ +#define MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY (1 << 22) /* Commands with R1B can't use R1. */ #define MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_A (1 << 23) /* Host supports Driver Type A */ #define MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_C (1 << 24) /* Host supports Driver Type C */ #define MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_D (1 << 25) /* Host supports Driver Type D */
[ Upstream commit 43cc64e5221cc6741252b64bc4531dd1eefb733d ]
The busy timeout that is computed for each erase/trim/discard operation, can become quite long and may thus exceed the host->max_busy_timeout. If that becomes the case, mmc_do_erase() converts from using an R1B response to an R1 response, as to prevent the host from doing HW busy detection.
However, it has turned out that some hosts requires an R1B response no matter what, so let's respect that via checking MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY. Note that, if the R1B gets enforced, the host becomes fully responsible of managing the needed busy timeout, in one way or the other.
Suggested-by: Sowjanya Komatineni skomatineni@nvidia.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: Anders Roxell anders.roxell@linaro.org Tested-by: Sowjanya Komatineni skomatineni@nvidia.com Tested-by: Faiz Abbas faiz_abbas@ti.com Tested-By: Peter Geis pgwipeout@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org --- drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c index abf8f5eb0a1c..26644b7ec13e 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c @@ -1732,8 +1732,11 @@ static int mmc_do_erase(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int from, * the erase operation does not exceed the max_busy_timeout, we should * use R1B response. Or we need to prevent the host from doing hw busy * detection, which is done by converting to a R1 response instead. + * Note, some hosts requires R1B, which also means they are on their own + * when it comes to deal with the busy timeout. */ - if (card->host->max_busy_timeout && + if (!(card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY) && + card->host->max_busy_timeout && busy_timeout > card->host->max_busy_timeout) { cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC; } else {
[ Upstream commit 18d200460cd73636d4f20674085c39e32b4e0097 ]
The busy timeout for the CMD5 to put the eMMC into sleep state, is specific to the card. Potentially the timeout may exceed the host->max_busy_timeout. If that becomes the case, mmc_sleep() converts from using an R1B response to an R1 response, as to prevent the host from doing HW busy detection.
However, it has turned out that some hosts requires an R1B response no matter what, so let's respect that via checking MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY. Note that, if the R1B gets enforced, the host becomes fully responsible of managing the needed busy timeout, in one way or the other.
Suggested-by: Sowjanya Komatineni skomatineni@nvidia.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200311092036.16084-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org --- drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c index f6912ded652d..de14b5845f52 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c @@ -1910,9 +1910,12 @@ static int mmc_sleep(struct mmc_host *host) * If the max_busy_timeout of the host is specified, validate it against * the sleep cmd timeout. A failure means we need to prevent the host * from doing hw busy detection, which is done by converting to a R1 - * response instead of a R1B. + * response instead of a R1B. Note, some hosts requires R1B, which also + * means they are on their own when it comes to deal with the busy + * timeout. */ - if (host->max_busy_timeout && (timeout_ms > host->max_busy_timeout)) { + if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY) && host->max_busy_timeout && + (timeout_ms > host->max_busy_timeout)) { cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC; } else { cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_R1B | MMC_CMD_AC;
[ Upstream commit 055e04830d4544c57f2a5192a26c9e25915c29c0 ]
It has turned out that the sdhci-omap controller requires the R1B response, for commands that has this response associated with them. So, converting from an R1B to an R1 response for a CMD6 for example, leads to problems with the HW busy detection support.
Fix this by informing the mmc core about the requirement, via setting the host cap, MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY.
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org Reported-by: Anders Roxell anders.roxell@linaro.org Reported-by: Faiz Abbas faiz_abbas@ti.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: Anders Roxell anders.roxell@linaro.org Tested-by: Faiz Abbas faiz_abbas@ti.com Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c index 083e7e053c95..d3135249b2e4 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c @@ -1134,6 +1134,9 @@ static int sdhci_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) host->mmc_host_ops.execute_tuning = sdhci_omap_execute_tuning; host->mmc_host_ops.enable_sdio_irq = sdhci_omap_enable_sdio_irq;
+ /* R1B responses is required to properly manage HW busy detection. */ + mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY; + ret = sdhci_setup_host(host); if (ret) goto err_put_sync;
[ Upstream commit d2f8bfa4bff5028bc40ed56b4497c32e05b0178f ]
It has turned out that the sdhci-tegra controller requires the R1B response, for commands that has this response associated with them. So, converting from an R1B to an R1 response for a CMD6 for example, leads to problems with the HW busy detection support.
Fix this by informing the mmc core about the requirement, via setting the host cap, MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY.
Reported-by: Bitan Biswas bbiswas@nvidia.com Reported-by: Peter Geis pgwipeout@gmail.com Suggested-by: Sowjanya Komatineni skomatineni@nvidia.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: Sowjanya Komatineni skomatineni@nvidia.com Tested-By: Peter Geis pgwipeout@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c index 403ac44a7378..a25c3a4d3f6c 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c @@ -1552,6 +1552,9 @@ static int sdhci_tegra_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (tegra_host->soc_data->nvquirks & NVQUIRK_ENABLE_DDR50) host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR;
+ /* R1B responses is required to properly manage HW busy detection. */ + host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY; + tegra_sdhci_parse_dt(host);
tegra_host->power_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "power",
On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 19:06, Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org wrote:
This series provides a couple of manually backported mmc changes that fixes some busy detect issues, for a couple of mmc host drivers (sdhci-tegra|omap).
Ulf Hansson (5): mmc: core: Allow host controllers to require R1B for CMD6 mmc: core: Respect MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY for erase/trim/discard mmc: core: Respect MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY for eMMC sleep command mmc: sdhci-omap: Fix busy detection by enabling MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY mmc: sdhci-tegra: Fix busy detection by enabling MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY
Tested-by: Anders Roxell anders.roxell@linaro.org
I tested it on a beagleboard x15.
Cheers, Anders
drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 5 ++++- drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 7 +++++-- drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 8 +++++--- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c | 3 +++ drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 3 +++ include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 + 6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
-- 2.20.1
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 07:06:45PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
This series provides a couple of manually backported mmc changes that fixes some busy detect issues, for a couple of mmc host drivers (sdhci-tegra|omap).
Ulf Hansson (5): mmc: core: Allow host controllers to require R1B for CMD6 mmc: core: Respect MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY for erase/trim/discard mmc: core: Respect MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY for eMMC sleep command mmc: sdhci-omap: Fix busy detection by enabling MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY mmc: sdhci-tegra: Fix busy detection by enabling MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY
drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 5 ++++- drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 7 +++++-- drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 8 +++++--- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c | 3 +++ drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 3 +++ include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 + 6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
I've queued this, the 5.4, and the 4.19 series. Thanks!
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 08:21, Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 07:06:45PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
This series provides a couple of manually backported mmc changes that fixes some busy detect issues, for a couple of mmc host drivers (sdhci-tegra|omap).
Ulf Hansson (5): mmc: core: Allow host controllers to require R1B for CMD6 mmc: core: Respect MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY for erase/trim/discard mmc: core: Respect MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY for eMMC sleep command mmc: sdhci-omap: Fix busy detection by enabling MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY mmc: sdhci-tegra: Fix busy detection by enabling MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY
drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 5 ++++- drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 7 +++++-- drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 8 +++++--- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c | 3 +++ drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 3 +++ include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 + 6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
I've queued this, the 5.4, and the 4.19 series. Thanks!
I think this was tested for 5.4 branch. Not sure about 4.19
Anders and Ulf, Was it validated against 4.19 branch ?
- Naresh
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 03:51, Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 07:06:45PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
This series provides a couple of manually backported mmc changes that fixes some busy detect issues, for a couple of mmc host drivers (sdhci-tegra|omap).
Ulf Hansson (5): mmc: core: Allow host controllers to require R1B for CMD6 mmc: core: Respect MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY for erase/trim/discard mmc: core: Respect MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY for eMMC sleep command mmc: sdhci-omap: Fix busy detection by enabling MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY mmc: sdhci-tegra: Fix busy detection by enabling MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY
drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 5 ++++- drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 7 +++++-- drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 8 +++++--- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c | 3 +++ drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 3 +++ include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 + 6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
I've queued this, the 5.4, and the 4.19 series. Thanks!
Hi Sasha,
I've tested all three kernels, but replied to 5.5 and 5.4 with "Tested-by". I did not reply "Tested-by" on 4.19 because I did not get a good result there. I'm investigating why it did not boot. I'm not sure if you should apply the patches yet to 4.19, and if you do, please do not add my "Tested-by" on 4.19.
Cheers, Anders
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org