The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From aaf461af729b81dbb19ec33abe6da74702b352d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ivan Vecera ivecera@redhat.com Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:40:52 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ice: Fix incorrect locking in ice_vc_process_vf_msg()

Usage of mutex_trylock() in ice_vc_process_vf_msg() is incorrect because message sent from VF is ignored and never processed.

Use mutex_lock() instead to fix the issue. It is safe because this mutex is used to prevent races between VF related NDOs and handlers processing request messages from VF and these handlers are running in ice_service_task() context. Additionally move this mutex lock prior ice_vc_is_opcode_allowed() call to avoid potential races during allowlist access.

Fixes: e6ba5273d4ed ("ice: Fix race conditions between virtchnl handling and VF ndo ops") Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera ivecera@redhat.com Tested-by: Konrad Jankowski konrad0.jankowski@intel.com Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c index 69ff4b929772..5612c032f15a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c @@ -3642,14 +3642,6 @@ void ice_vc_process_vf_msg(struct ice_pf *pf, struct ice_rq_event_info *event) err = -EINVAL; }

- if (!ice_vc_is_opcode_allowed(vf, v_opcode)) { - ice_vc_send_msg_to_vf(vf, v_opcode, - VIRTCHNL_STATUS_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED, NULL, - 0); - ice_put_vf(vf); - return; - } - error_handler: if (err) { ice_vc_send_msg_to_vf(vf, v_opcode, VIRTCHNL_STATUS_ERR_PARAM, @@ -3660,12 +3652,13 @@ void ice_vc_process_vf_msg(struct ice_pf *pf, struct ice_rq_event_info *event) return; }

- /* VF is being configured in another context that triggers a VFR, so no - * need to process this message - */ - if (!mutex_trylock(&vf->cfg_lock)) { - dev_info(dev, "VF %u is being configured in another context that will trigger a VFR, so there is no need to handle this message\n", - vf->vf_id); + mutex_lock(&vf->cfg_lock); + + if (!ice_vc_is_opcode_allowed(vf, v_opcode)) { + ice_vc_send_msg_to_vf(vf, v_opcode, + VIRTCHNL_STATUS_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED, NULL, + 0); + mutex_unlock(&vf->cfg_lock); ice_put_vf(vf); return; }