Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu olvaffe@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c index e9b45089a28a6..863b2a34b2d64 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ static int amdgpu_sched_process_priority_override(struct amdgpu_device *adev, { struct fd f = fdget(fd); struct amdgpu_fpriv *fpriv; + struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr; struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx; uint32_t id; int r; @@ -51,8 +52,11 @@ static int amdgpu_sched_process_priority_override(struct amdgpu_device *adev, return r; }
- idr_for_each_entry(&fpriv->ctx_mgr.ctx_handles, ctx, id) + mgr = &fpriv->ctx_mgr; + mutex_lock(&mgr->lock); + idr_for_each_entry(&mgr->ctx_handles, ctx, id) amdgpu_ctx_priority_override(ctx, priority); + mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
fdput(f); return 0;
From coding style's perspective, this lock/unlock handling should be put into amdgpu_ctx_priority_override.
Regards, Guchun
-----Original Message----- From: amd-gfx amd-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org On Behalf Of Chia- I Wu Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2023 8:48 AM To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Pan, Xinhui Xinhui.Pan@amd.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; stable@vger.kernel.org; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch; Deucher, Alexander Alexander.Deucher@amd.com; David Airlie airlied@gmail.com; Koenig, Christian Christian.Koenig@amd.com Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: add a missing lock for AMDGPU_SCHED
Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu olvaffe@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c index e9b45089a28a6..863b2a34b2d64 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ static int amdgpu_sched_process_priority_override(struct amdgpu_device *adev, { struct fd f = fdget(fd); struct amdgpu_fpriv *fpriv;
- struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr; struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx; uint32_t id; int r;
@@ -51,8 +52,11 @@ static int amdgpu_sched_process_priority_override(struct amdgpu_device *adev, return r; }
- idr_for_each_entry(&fpriv->ctx_mgr.ctx_handles, ctx, id)
mgr = &fpriv->ctx_mgr;
mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
idr_for_each_entry(&mgr->ctx_handles, ctx, id) amdgpu_ctx_priority_override(ctx, priority);
mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
fdput(f); return 0;
-- 2.40.0.634.g4ca3ef3211-goog
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 7:27 PM Chen, Guchun Guchun.Chen@amd.com wrote:
From coding style's perspective, this lock/unlock handling should be put into amdgpu_ctx_priority_override.
The locking is to protect mgr->ctx_handles.
Regards, Guchun
-----Original Message----- From: amd-gfx amd-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org On Behalf Of Chia- I Wu Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2023 8:48 AM To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Pan, Xinhui Xinhui.Pan@amd.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; stable@vger.kernel.org; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch; Deucher, Alexander Alexander.Deucher@amd.com; David Airlie airlied@gmail.com; Koenig, Christian Christian.Koenig@amd.com Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: add a missing lock for AMDGPU_SCHED
Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu olvaffe@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c index e9b45089a28a6..863b2a34b2d64 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ static int amdgpu_sched_process_priority_override(struct amdgpu_device *adev, { struct fd f = fdget(fd); struct amdgpu_fpriv *fpriv;
struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr; struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx; uint32_t id; int r;@@ -51,8 +52,11 @@ static int amdgpu_sched_process_priority_override(struct amdgpu_device *adev, return r; }
idr_for_each_entry(&fpriv->ctx_mgr.ctx_handles, ctx, id)
mgr = &fpriv->ctx_mgr;mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);idr_for_each_entry(&mgr->ctx_handles, ctx, id) amdgpu_ctx_priority_override(ctx, priority);mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock); fdput(f); return 0;-- 2.40.0.634.g4ca3ef3211-goog
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 05:48:27PM -0700, Chia-I Wu wrote:
Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu olvaffe@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
I know I can not take patches without any changelog text at all, maybe the DRM developers are more lax, but it's not a good idea at all.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 9:58 PM Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 05:48:27PM -0700, Chia-I Wu wrote:
Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu olvaffe@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
I know I can not take patches without any changelog text at all, maybe the DRM developers are more lax, but it's not a good idea at all.
Oops, sorry. I've sent out v2 to address both review feedback.
thanks,
greg k-h
Am 26.04.23 um 02:48 schrieb Chia-I Wu:
Good catch, but you need some commit message here. Something like "Need to hold the lock while iterating the idr to make sure no context is destroyed." should be sufficient.
Apart from that looks good to me.
Regards, Christian.
Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu olvaffe@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c index e9b45089a28a6..863b2a34b2d64 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sched.c @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ static int amdgpu_sched_process_priority_override(struct amdgpu_device *adev, { struct fd f = fdget(fd); struct amdgpu_fpriv *fpriv;
- struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr; struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx; uint32_t id; int r;
@@ -51,8 +52,11 @@ static int amdgpu_sched_process_priority_override(struct amdgpu_device *adev, return r; }
- idr_for_each_entry(&fpriv->ctx_mgr.ctx_handles, ctx, id)
- mgr = &fpriv->ctx_mgr;
- mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
- idr_for_each_entry(&mgr->ctx_handles, ctx, id) amdgpu_ctx_priority_override(ctx, priority);
- mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
fdput(f); return 0;
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Chen, Guchun -
Chia-I Wu -
Christian König -
Greg KH