commit 948d7f2d279feceb51bcdedb5eb8ce0af60045ce (stable_rc/linux-5.10.y) Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Date: Sat Apr 3 13:52:16 2021 +0200
Linux 5.10.28-rc1
--- (01/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_nptl: PASS (6.72 s) (02/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_math: PASS (1.90 s) (03/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_hugetlb: PASS (0.07 s) (04/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_ipc: PASS (20.08 s) (05/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_uevent: PASS (0.05 s) (06/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_containers: PASS (36.90 s) (07/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_filecaps: PASS (0.11 s) (08/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_hyperthreading: PASS (71.17 s) (09/28) kpatch.sh: PASS (12.62 s) (10/28) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_help: PASS (0.08 s) (11/28) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_version: PASS (0.06 s) (12/28) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_list: PASS (0.40 s) (13/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_record: PASS (4.78 s) (14/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_kallsyms: PASS (0.26 s) (15/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_annotate: PASS (8.75 s) (16/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_evlist: PASS (0.07 s) (17/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_script: PASS (0.57 s) (18/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_stat: PASS (3.23 s) (19/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_bench: PASS (0.07 s) (20/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sysctl: PASS (0.03 s) (21/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_size: PASS (0.02 s) (22/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_x86: PASS (0.26 s) (23/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sigaltstack: PASS (0.02 s) (24/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_tmpfs: PASS (0.02 s) (25/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_user: PASS (0.03 s) (26/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timens: PASS (0.09 s) (27/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_kvm: PASS (13.57 s) (28/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timers: PASS (554.55 s) RESULTS : PASS 28 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT 0 | CANCEL 0 JOB TIME : 737.14 s
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 02:41:43PM -0700, Patrick Mccormick wrote:
commit 948d7f2d279feceb51bcdedb5eb8ce0af60045ce (stable_rc/linux-5.10.y) Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Date: Sat Apr 3 13:52:16 2021 +0200
Linux 5.10.28-rc1
(01/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_nptl: PASS (6.72 s) (02/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_math: PASS (1.90 s) (03/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_hugetlb: PASS (0.07 s) (04/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_ipc: PASS (20.08 s) (05/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_uevent: PASS (0.05 s) (06/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_containers: PASS (36.90 s) (07/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_filecaps: PASS (0.11 s) (08/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_hyperthreading: PASS (71.17 s) (09/28) kpatch.sh: PASS (12.62 s) (10/28) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_help: PASS (0.08 s) (11/28) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_version: PASS (0.06 s) (12/28) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_list: PASS (0.40 s) (13/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_record: PASS (4.78 s) (14/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_kallsyms: PASS (0.26 s) (15/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_annotate: PASS (8.75 s) (16/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_evlist: PASS (0.07 s) (17/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_script: PASS (0.57 s) (18/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_stat: PASS (3.23 s) (19/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_bench: PASS (0.07 s) (20/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sysctl: PASS (0.03 s) (21/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_size: PASS (0.02 s) (22/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_x86: PASS (0.26 s) (23/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sigaltstack: PASS (0.02 s) (24/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_tmpfs: PASS (0.02 s) (25/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_user: PASS (0.03 s) (26/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timens: PASS (0.09 s) (27/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_kvm: PASS (13.57 s) (28/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timers: PASS (554.55 s) RESULTS : PASS 28 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT 0 | CANCEL 0 JOB TIME : 737.14 s
Nice, what does this mean? ANd do you wish to provide a "Tested-by:" tag for this?
thanks,
greg k-h
This means: "5.10.28-rc1 was tested and we saw no failures". I will add a simple english description to the email template for next RC.
I can certainly add a Tested-by tag to the template.
Thanks for the feedback I'll get these changes going for the next RC.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 2:01 AM Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 02:41:43PM -0700, Patrick Mccormick wrote:
commit 948d7f2d279feceb51bcdedb5eb8ce0af60045ce (stable_rc/linux-5.10.y) Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Date: Sat Apr 3 13:52:16 2021 +0200
Linux 5.10.28-rc1
(01/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_nptl: PASS (6.72 s) (02/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_math: PASS (1.90 s) (03/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_hugetlb: PASS (0.07 s) (04/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_ipc: PASS (20.08 s) (05/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_uevent: PASS (0.05 s) (06/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_containers: PASS (36.90 s) (07/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_filecaps: PASS (0.11 s) (08/28) ltp.py:LTP.test_hyperthreading: PASS (71.17 s) (09/28) kpatch.sh: PASS (12.62 s) (10/28) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_help: PASS (0.08 s) (11/28) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_version: PASS (0.06 s) (12/28) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_list: PASS (0.40 s) (13/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_record: PASS (4.78 s) (14/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_kallsyms: PASS (0.26 s) (15/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_annotate: PASS (8.75 s) (16/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_evlist: PASS (0.07 s) (17/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_script: PASS (0.57 s) (18/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_stat: PASS (3.23 s) (19/28) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_bench: PASS (0.07 s) (20/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sysctl: PASS (0.03 s) (21/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_size: PASS (0.02 s) (22/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_x86: PASS (0.26 s) (23/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sigaltstack: PASS (0.02 s) (24/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_tmpfs: PASS (0.02 s) (25/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_user: PASS (0.03 s) (26/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timens: PASS (0.09 s) (27/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_kvm: PASS (13.57 s) (28/28) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timers: PASS (554.55 s) RESULTS : PASS 28 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT 0 | CANCEL 0 JOB TIME : 737.14 s
Nice, what does this mean? ANd do you wish to provide a "Tested-by:" tag for this?
thanks,
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org