From: Hugo Villeneuve hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com
Add some clarifications for patches that have dependencies within the patch series.
Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com --- Changes since v1: rebase on latest torvalds/master
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst index 41f1e07abfdf..1704f1c686d0 100644 --- a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst +++ b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst @@ -101,6 +101,19 @@ comment: git cherry-pick fd21073 git cherry-pick <this commit>
+ Note that for a patch series, you do not have to list as prerequisites the + patches present in the series itself. For example, if you have the following + patch series: + + .. code-block:: none + + patch1 + patch2 + + where patch2 depends on patch1, you do not have to list patch1 as + prerequisite of patch2 if you have already marked patch1 for stable + inclusion. + * For patches that may have kernel version prerequisites specify them using the following format in the sign-off area:
base-commit: 0bb80ecc33a8fb5a682236443c1e740d5c917d1d
Hi,
Thanks for your patch.
FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.
The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html/#opt...
Rule: add the tag "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org" in the sign-off area to have the patch automatically included in the stable tree. Subject: [PATCH v2] Documentation: stable: clarify patch series prerequisites Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20230911203628.20068-1-hugo%40hugovil.com
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org