This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.179 release. There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.179-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.4.179-rc1
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++-- drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
commit bd2db32e7c3e35bd4d9b8bbff689434a50893546 upstream.
It was reported that the mmc host structure could be accessed after it was freed in moxart_remove(), so fix this by saving the base register of the device and using it instead of the pointer dereference.
Cc: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org Cc: Xiyu Yang xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn Cc: Xin Xiong xiongx18@fudan.edu.cn Cc: Xin Tan tanxin.ctf@gmail.com Cc: Tony Lindgren tony@atomide.com Cc: Yang Li yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: whitehat002 hackyzh002@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127071638.4057899-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.or... Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c @@ -696,12 +696,12 @@ static int moxart_remove(struct platform if (!IS_ERR(host->dma_chan_rx)) dma_release_channel(host->dma_chan_rx); mmc_remove_host(mmc); - mmc_free_host(mmc);
writel(0, host->base + REG_INTERRUPT_MASK); writel(0, host->base + REG_POWER_CONTROL); writel(readl(host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL) | CLK_OFF, host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL); + mmc_free_host(mmc); } return 0; }
On 2/9/22 12:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.179 release. There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.179-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On 2/9/2022 11:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.179 release. There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.179-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 20:14:09 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.179 release. There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.179-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.4: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 59 tests: 59 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.4.179-rc1-g3eacd9fd7c98 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 00:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.179 release. There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.179-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.4.179-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.4.y * git commit: 3eacd9fd7c98dd0c2574ea8f3692776fd62b4557 * git describe: v5.4.177-47-g3eacd9fd7c98 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.17...
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.177-45-g3836147e31ee) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.177-45-g3836147e31ee) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.4.177-45-g3836147e31ee) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.177-45-g3836147e31ee) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 70784, pass: 60720, fail: 227, skip: 9035, xfail: 802
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 258 total, 258 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 35 total, 30 passed, 5 failed * i386: 19 total, 19 passed, 0 failed * mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 52 total, 39 passed, 13 failed * riscv: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.179 release. There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/733
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, at 2:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.179 release. There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Compiled and booted 5.4.179-rc1 on my x86_64 test system successfully without errors or regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins slade@sladewatkins.com
Thanks, Slade
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.179 release. There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 449 pass: 449 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Florian Fainelli -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Shuah Khan -
Slade Watkins -
Sudip Mukherjee