From: Ben Dooks ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk

commit a382c757ec5ef83137a86125f43a4c43dc2ab50b upstream.

The fu740 PCIe core does not probe any devices on the SiFive Unmatched board without this fix (or having U-Boot explicitly start the PCIe via either boot-script or user command). The fix is to start the link at 2.5GT/s speeds and once the link is up then change the maximum speed back to the default.

The U-Boot driver claims to set the link-speed to 2.5GT/s to get the probe to work (and U-Boot does print link up at 2.5GT/s) in the following code: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/drivers/pci/pcie_dw_sifiv...

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220318152430.526320-1-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas bhelgaas@google.com Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt palmer@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com ---

Please apply this patch to v5.15+ stable trees which fixes PCIe on the very popular SiFive Unmatched RISC-V board.

drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-fu740.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-fu740.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-fu740.c index 00cde9a248b5..78d002be4f82 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-fu740.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-fu740.c @@ -181,10 +181,59 @@ static int fu740_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *pci) { struct device *dev = pci->dev; struct fu740_pcie *afp = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + u8 cap_exp = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP); + int ret; + u32 orig, tmp; + + /* + * Force 2.5GT/s when starting the link, due to some devices not + * probing at higher speeds. This happens with the PCIe switch + * on the Unmatched board when U-Boot has not initialised the PCIe. + * The fix in U-Boot is to force 2.5GT/s, which then gets cleared + * by the soft reset done by this driver. + */ + dev_dbg(dev, "cap_exp at %x\n", cap_exp); + dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci); + + tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, cap_exp + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP); + orig = tmp & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS; + tmp &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS; + tmp |= PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_2_5GB; + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, cap_exp + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, tmp);

/* Enable LTSSM */ writel_relaxed(0x1, afp->mgmt_base + PCIEX8MGMT_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE); - return 0; + + ret = dw_pcie_wait_for_link(pci); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "error: link did not start\n"); + goto err; + } + + tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, cap_exp + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP); + if ((tmp & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS) != orig) { + dev_dbg(dev, "changing speed back to original\n"); + + tmp &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS; + tmp |= orig; + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, cap_exp + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, tmp); + + tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL); + tmp |= PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE; + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, tmp); + + ret = dw_pcie_wait_for_link(pci); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "error: link did not start at new speed\n"); + goto err; + } + } + + ret = 0; +err: + WARN_ON(ret); /* we assume that errors will be very rare */ + dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci); + return ret; }

static int fu740_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)