[REGRESSION] workqueue/writeback: Severe CPU hang due to kworker proliferation during I/O flush and cgroup cleanup - Linux-stable-mirror

25 Sep 2025


      Hello,
This is Chenglong from Google Container Optimized OS. I'm reporting a
severe CPU hang regression that occurs after a high volume of file
creation and subsequent cgroup cleanup.
Through bisection, the issue appears to be caused by a chain reaction
between three commits related to writeback, unbound workqueues, and
CPU-hogging detection. The issue is greatly alleviated on the latest
mainline kernel but is not fully resolved, still occurring
intermittently (~1 in 10 runs).
How to reproduce
The kernel v6.1 is good. The hang is reliably triggered(over 80%
chance) on kernels v6.6 and 6.12 and intermittently on
mainline(6.17-rc7) with the following steps:
Environment: A machine with a fast SSD and a high core count (e.g.,
Google Cloud's N2-standard-128).
Workload: Concurrently generate a large number of files (e.g., 2
million) using multiple services managed by systemd-run. This creates
significant I/O and cgroup churn.
Trigger: After the file generation completes, terminate the
systemd-run services.
Result: Shortly after the services are killed, the system's CPU load
spikes, leading to a massive number of kworker/+inode_switch_wbs
threads and a system-wide hang/livelock where the machine becomes
unresponsive (20s - 300s).
Analysis and Problematic Commits
1. The initial commit: The process begins with a worker that can get
stuck busy-waiting on a spinlock.
Commit: ("writeback, cgroup: release dying cgwbs by switching attached inodes")
Effect: This introduced the inode_switch_wbs_work_fn worker to clean
up cgroup writeback structures. Under our test load, this worker
appears to hit a highly contended wb->list_lock spinlock, causing it
to burn 100% CPU without sleeping.
2. The Kworker Explosion: A subsequent change misinterprets the
spinning worker from Stage 1, leading to a runaway feedback loop of
worker creation.
Commit: 616db8779b1e ("workqueue: Automatically mark CPU-hogging work
items CPU_INTENSIVE")
Effect: This logic sees the spinning worker, marks it as
CPU_INTENSIVE, and excludes it from concurrency management. To handle
the work backlog, it spawns a new kworker, which then also gets stuck
on the same lock, repeating the cycle. This directly causes the
kworker count to explode from <50 to 100-2000+.
3. The System-Wide Lockdown: The final piece allows this localized
worker explosion to saturate the entire system.
Commit: 8639ecebc9b1 ("workqueue: Implement non-strict affinity scope
for unbound workqueues")
Effect: This change introduced non-strict affinity as the default. It
allows the hundreds of kworkers created in Stage 2 to be spread by the
scheduler across all available CPU cores, turning the problem into a
system-wide hang.
Current Status and Mitigation
Mainline Status: On the latest mainline kernel, the hang is far less
frequent and the kworker counts are reduced back to normal (<50),
suggesting other changes have partially mitigated the issue. However,
the hang still occurs, and when it does, the kworker count still
explodes (e.g., 300+), indicating the underlying feedback loop
remains.
Workaround: A reliable mitigation is to revert to the old workqueue
behavior by setting affinity_strict to 1. This contains the kworker
proliferation to a single CPU pod, preventing the system-wide hang.
Questions
Given that the issue is not fully resolved, could you please provide
some guidance?
1. Is this a known issue, and are there patches in development that
might fully address the underlying spinlock contention or the kworker
feedback loop?
2. Is there a better long-term mitigation we can apply other than
forcing strict affinity?
Thank you for your time and help.
Best regards,
Chenglong