Fix the size of the buffer allocated to store the in-memory BBT. This bug was previously hidden by a different bug, that was fixed in d098093ba06e.
Fixes: 9c3736a3de21 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to deal with NAND devices") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf frieder.schrempf@kontron.de --- drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c index 56cde38..c12497f 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ int nanddev_bbt_init(struct nand_device *nand) unsigned int nwords = DIV_ROUND_UP(nblocks * bits_per_block, BITS_PER_LONG);
- nand->bbt.cache = kzalloc(nwords, GFP_KERNEL); + nand->bbt.cache = kzalloc(nwords * (BITS_PER_LONG / BITS_PER_BYTE), + GFP_KERNEL); if (!nand->bbt.cache) return -ENOMEM;
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 07:44:52 +0000 Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de wrote:
Fix the size of the buffer allocated to store the in-memory BBT. This bug was previously hidden by a different bug, that was fixed in d098093ba06e.
Oops :-/.
Fixes: 9c3736a3de21 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to deal with NAND devices") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf frieder.schrempf@kontron.de
drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c index 56cde38..c12497f 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ int nanddev_bbt_init(struct nand_device *nand) unsigned int nwords = DIV_ROUND_UP(nblocks * bits_per_block, BITS_PER_LONG);
- nand->bbt.cache = kzalloc(nwords, GFP_KERNEL);
- nand->bbt.cache = kzalloc(nwords * (BITS_PER_LONG / BITS_PER_BYTE),
I prefer
* sizeof(*nand->bbt.cache) If you're okay with this change, I'll fix it when applying (no need to send a new version).
Thanks,
Boris
if (!nand->bbt.cache) return -ENOMEM;GFP_KERNEL);
On 27.11.18 09:22, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 07:44:52 +0000 Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de wrote:
Fix the size of the buffer allocated to store the in-memory BBT. This bug was previously hidden by a different bug, that was fixed in d098093ba06e.
Oops :-/.
Fixes: 9c3736a3de21 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to deal with NAND devices") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf frieder.schrempf@kontron.de
drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c index 56cde38..c12497f 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ int nanddev_bbt_init(struct nand_device *nand) unsigned int nwords = DIV_ROUND_UP(nblocks * bits_per_block, BITS_PER_LONG);
- nand->bbt.cache = kzalloc(nwords, GFP_KERNEL);
- nand->bbt.cache = kzalloc(nwords * (BITS_PER_LONG / BITS_PER_BYTE),
I prefer
* sizeof(*nand->bbt.cache)
If you're okay with this change, I'll fix it when applying (no need to send a new version).
Sure, that's ok.
Hello,
Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de wrote on Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:30:24 +0000:
On 27.11.18 09:22, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 07:44:52 +0000 Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de wrote:
Fix the size of the buffer allocated to store the in-memory BBT. This bug was previously hidden by a different bug, that was fixed in d098093ba06e.
Oops :-/.
Fixes: 9c3736a3de21 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to deal with NAND devices") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf frieder.schrempf@kontron.de
drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c index 56cde38..c12497f 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ int nanddev_bbt_init(struct nand_device *nand) unsigned int nwords = DIV_ROUND_UP(nblocks * bits_per_block, BITS_PER_LONG);
- nand->bbt.cache = kzalloc(nwords, GFP_KERNEL);
- nand->bbt.cache = kzalloc(nwords * (BITS_PER_LONG / BITS_PER_BYTE),
I prefer
* sizeof(*nand->bbt.cache)
If you're okay with this change, I'll fix it when applying (no need to send a new version).
Sure, that's ok.
I also prefer with the sizeof() operator. Thanks for fixing this!
Acked-by: Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Thanks, Miquèl
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 07:44:52 +0000 Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de wrote:
Fix the size of the buffer allocated to store the in-memory BBT. This bug was previously hidden by a different bug, that was fixed in d098093ba06e.
Fixes: 9c3736a3de21 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to deal with NAND devices") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf frieder.schrempf@kontron.de
Looks like your From header does not match the SoB tag ('Frieder Schrempf' vs 'Schrempf Frieder') and checkpatch does not like that. I'll fix it when applying, but maybe you should fix your .gitconfig to make them match.
drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c index 56cde38..c12497f 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ int nanddev_bbt_init(struct nand_device *nand) unsigned int nwords = DIV_ROUND_UP(nblocks * bits_per_block, BITS_PER_LONG);
- nand->bbt.cache = kzalloc(nwords, GFP_KERNEL);
- nand->bbt.cache = kzalloc(nwords * (BITS_PER_LONG / BITS_PER_BYTE),
if (!nand->bbt.cache) return -ENOMEM;GFP_KERNEL);
Hi Boris,
On 28.11.18 15:41, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 07:44:52 +0000 Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de wrote:
Fix the size of the buffer allocated to store the in-memory BBT. This bug was previously hidden by a different bug, that was fixed in d098093ba06e.
Fixes: 9c3736a3de21 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to deal with NAND devices") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf frieder.schrempf@kontron.de
Looks like your From header does not match the SoB tag ('Frieder Schrempf' vs 'Schrempf Frieder') and checkpatch does not like that. I'll fix it when applying, but maybe you should fix your .gitconfig to make them match.
Actually the From header in my local patch is correct (<first name> <last name>, Frieder Schrempf) as it comes from my git config. But since our company was renamed and our mail servers were transferred, our e-mails are sent with From=<last name> <first name>.
It seems like git send-email or patchwork or whatever uses the information from the e-mail header instead of what is in the patch.
I will try to raise this issue with our IT department as this would be best fixed on their side.
Thanks, Frieder
drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c index 56cde38..c12497f 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/bbt.c @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ int nanddev_bbt_init(struct nand_device *nand) unsigned int nwords = DIV_ROUND_UP(nblocks * bits_per_block, BITS_PER_LONG);
- nand->bbt.cache = kzalloc(nwords, GFP_KERNEL);
- nand->bbt.cache = kzalloc(nwords * (BITS_PER_LONG / BITS_PER_BYTE),
if (!nand->bbt.cache) return -ENOMEM;GFP_KERNEL);
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 14:55:45 +0000 Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de wrote:
Hi Boris,
On 28.11.18 15:41, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 07:44:52 +0000 Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de wrote:
Fix the size of the buffer allocated to store the in-memory BBT. This bug was previously hidden by a different bug, that was fixed in d098093ba06e.
Fixes: 9c3736a3de21 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to deal with NAND devices") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf frieder.schrempf@kontron.de
Looks like your From header does not match the SoB tag ('Frieder Schrempf' vs 'Schrempf Frieder') and checkpatch does not like that. I'll fix it when applying, but maybe you should fix your .gitconfig to make them match.
Actually the From header in my local patch is correct (<first name> <last name>, Frieder Schrempf) as it comes from my git config. But since our company was renamed and our mail servers were transferred, our e-mails are sent with From=<last name> <first name>.
It seems like git send-email or patchwork or whatever uses the information from the e-mail header instead of what is in the patch.
I will try to raise this issue with our IT department as this would be best fixed on their side.
There's another solution: make git send-email add a From header in the message body.
git config --global sendemail.from "Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de"
On 28.11.18 16:02, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 14:55:45 +0000 Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de wrote:
Hi Boris,
On 28.11.18 15:41, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 07:44:52 +0000 Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de wrote:
Fix the size of the buffer allocated to store the in-memory BBT. This bug was previously hidden by a different bug, that was fixed in d098093ba06e.
Fixes: 9c3736a3de21 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to deal with NAND devices") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf frieder.schrempf@kontron.de
Looks like your From header does not match the SoB tag ('Frieder Schrempf' vs 'Schrempf Frieder') and checkpatch does not like that. I'll fix it when applying, but maybe you should fix your .gitconfig to make them match.
Actually the From header in my local patch is correct (<first name> <last name>, Frieder Schrempf) as it comes from my git config. But since our company was renamed and our mail servers were transferred, our e-mails are sent with From=<last name> <first name>.
It seems like git send-email or patchwork or whatever uses the information from the e-mail header instead of what is in the patch.
I will try to raise this issue with our IT department as this would be best fixed on their side.
There's another solution: make git send-email add a From header in the message body.
git config --global sendemail.from "Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de"
I don't get it. How would that change things? My From still wouldn't match my SoB tags.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 15:19:37 +0000 Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de wrote:
On 28.11.18 16:02, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 14:55:45 +0000 Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de wrote:
Hi Boris,
On 28.11.18 15:41, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 07:44:52 +0000 Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de wrote:
Fix the size of the buffer allocated to store the in-memory BBT. This bug was previously hidden by a different bug, that was fixed in d098093ba06e.
Fixes: 9c3736a3de21 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to deal with NAND devices") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf frieder.schrempf@kontron.de
Looks like your From header does not match the SoB tag ('Frieder Schrempf' vs 'Schrempf Frieder') and checkpatch does not like that. I'll fix it when applying, but maybe you should fix your .gitconfig to make them match.
Actually the From header in my local patch is correct (<first name> <last name>, Frieder Schrempf) as it comes from my git config. But since our company was renamed and our mail servers were transferred, our e-mails are sent with From=<last name> <first name>.
It seems like git send-email or patchwork or whatever uses the information from the e-mail header instead of what is in the patch.
I will try to raise this issue with our IT department as this would be best fixed on their side.
There's another solution: make git send-email add a From header in the message body.
git config --global sendemail.from "Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de"
I don't get it. How would that change things? My From still wouldn't match my SoB tags.
When there's a From line in the message Body, git am will use this one instead of the one in the header section.
On 28.11.18 16:28, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 15:19:37 +0000 Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de wrote:
On 28.11.18 16:02, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 14:55:45 +0000 Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de wrote:
Hi Boris,
On 28.11.18 15:41, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 07:44:52 +0000 Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de wrote:
Fix the size of the buffer allocated to store the in-memory BBT. This bug was previously hidden by a different bug, that was fixed in d098093ba06e.
Fixes: 9c3736a3de21 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to deal with NAND devices") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf frieder.schrempf@kontron.de
Looks like your From header does not match the SoB tag ('Frieder Schrempf' vs 'Schrempf Frieder') and checkpatch does not like that. I'll fix it when applying, but maybe you should fix your .gitconfig to make them match.
Actually the From header in my local patch is correct (<first name> <last name>, Frieder Schrempf) as it comes from my git config. But since our company was renamed and our mail servers were transferred, our e-mails are sent with From=<last name> <first name>.
It seems like git send-email or patchwork or whatever uses the information from the e-mail header instead of what is in the patch.
I will try to raise this issue with our IT department as this would be best fixed on their side.
There's another solution: make git send-email add a From header in the message body.
git config --global sendemail.from "Schrempf Frieder frieder.schrempf@kontron.de"
I don't get it. How would that change things? My From still wouldn't match my SoB tags.
When there's a From line in the message Body, git am will use this one instead of the one in the header section.
Ok, now I got it. I didn't know that git send-email adds the From tag in the body if sendemail.from differs from the author, but that makes sense indeed.
I just checked and with my old mail setup, the SMTP server was respecting my sender address from the client (send-email, thunderbird).
The new setup uses DavMail Gateway to send via the companies Exchange server and it just ignores my sender from the client and sends with the reversed name as stored in the Exchange server.
I don't like sending mail with reversed names (people start calling me by my last name), but using a different SMTP server would likely cause trouble with some recipients using SPF for spam detection.
So I guess I have to convince our IT to change the names, if even possible... Oh, why do such small things always cause so much trouble?
On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 07:44:52 UTC, Schrempf Frieder wrote:
Fix the size of the buffer allocated to store the in-memory BBT. This bug was previously hidden by a different bug, that was fixed in d098093ba06e.
Fixes: 9c3736a3de21 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to deal with NAND devices") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf frieder.schrempf@kontron.de Acked-by: Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Applied to http://git.infradead.org/linux-mtd.git master, thanks.
Boris
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org