On 11/23/2025 7:45 PM, Guangshuo Li wrote:
Hi Tony, all,
Thanks for the review. As suggested by Tony, I’ll keep the declarations at the top and place the bounds checks before assigning last_byte. I’ll send a v2 with the following change:
static bool e1000_tbi_should_accept(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u8 status, u8 errors, u32 length, const u8 *data) { struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw; u8 last_byte;
/* Guard against OOB on data[length - 1] */ if (unlikely(!length)) return false;
/* Upper bound: length must not exceed rx_buffer_len */ if (unlikely(length > adapter->rx_buffer_len)) return false;
last_byte = data[length - 1];
/* existing logic follows ... */ } Please let me know if further adjustments are preferred.
This looks along the lines of what I was expecting.
Thanks, Tony
Best regards, Guangshuo Li
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org