When commit 9017dc4fbd59 ("pwm: jz4740: Enhance precision in calculation of duty cycle") from v5.8-rc1 was backported to v5.4.x its dependency on commit ce1f9cece057 ("pwm: jz4740: Use clocks from TCU driver") was not noticed which made the pwm-jz4740 driver fail to build.
As ce1f9cece057 depends on still more rework, just backport a small part of this commit to make the driver build again. (There is no dependency on the functionality introduced in ce1f9cece057, just the rate variable is needed.)
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de --- Hello,
@Paul: Can you please check this is correct? I only build-tested this change.
Best regards Uwe
drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c index d0f5c69930d0..77c28313e95f 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c @@ -92,11 +92,12 @@ static int jz4740_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, { struct jz4740_pwm_chip *jz4740 = to_jz4740(pwm->chip); unsigned long long tmp; - unsigned long period, duty; + unsigned long rate, period, duty; unsigned int prescaler = 0; uint16_t ctrl;
- tmp = (unsigned long long)clk_get_rate(jz4740->clk) * state->period; + rate = clk_get_rate(jz4740->clk); + tmp = rate * state->period; do_div(tmp, 1000000000); period = tmp;
Am 10.07.2020 um 12:27 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de:
When commit 9017dc4fbd59 ("pwm: jz4740: Enhance precision in calculation of duty cycle") from v5.8-rc1 was backported to v5.4.x its dependency on commit ce1f9cece057 ("pwm: jz4740: Use clocks from TCU driver") was not noticed which made the pwm-jz4740 driver fail to build.
Please can you add my "reported by?"
As ce1f9cece057 depends on still more rework, just backport a small part of this commit to make the driver build again. (There is no dependency on the functionality introduced in ce1f9cece057, just the rate variable is needed.)
BR and thanks, Nikolaus
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Hello,
@Paul: Can you please check this is correct? I only build-tested this change.
Best regards Uwe
drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c index d0f5c69930d0..77c28313e95f 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c @@ -92,11 +92,12 @@ static int jz4740_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, { struct jz4740_pwm_chip *jz4740 = to_jz4740(pwm->chip); unsigned long long tmp;
- unsigned long period, duty;
- unsigned long rate, period, duty; unsigned int prescaler = 0; uint16_t ctrl;
- tmp = (unsigned long long)clk_get_rate(jz4740->clk) * state->period;
- rate = clk_get_rate(jz4740->clk);
- tmp = rate * state->period; do_div(tmp, 1000000000); period = tmp;
-- 2.27.0
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:48:36PM +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 10.07.2020 um 12:27 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de:
When commit 9017dc4fbd59 ("pwm: jz4740: Enhance precision in calculation of duty cycle") from v5.8-rc1 was backported to v5.4.x its dependency on commit ce1f9cece057 ("pwm: jz4740: Use clocks from TCU driver") was not noticed which made the pwm-jz4740 driver fail to build.
Please can you add my "reported by?"
Greg, can you please add this while applying? (Assuming you're ok with this change and ideally Paul can confirm the change is fine.)
Reported-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller hns@goldelico.com
Best regards Uwe
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 09:47:02PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:48:36PM +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 10.07.2020 um 12:27 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de:
When commit 9017dc4fbd59 ("pwm: jz4740: Enhance precision in calculation of duty cycle") from v5.8-rc1 was backported to v5.4.x its dependency on commit ce1f9cece057 ("pwm: jz4740: Use clocks from TCU driver") was not noticed which made the pwm-jz4740 driver fail to build.
Please can you add my "reported by?"
Greg, can you please add this while applying? (Assuming you're ok with this change and ideally Paul can confirm the change is fine.)
Reported-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller hns@goldelico.com
Now added, thanks.
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org