The following changes since commit 347e9f5043c89695b01e66b3ed111755afcf1911:
Linux 6.16-rc6 (2025-07-13 14:25:58 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus
for you to fetch changes up to 6693731487a8145a9b039bc983d77edc47693855:
vsock/virtio: Allocate nonlinear SKBs for handling large transmit buffers (2025-08-01 09:11:09 -0400)
Changes from v1: drop commits that I put in there by mistake. Sorry!
---------------------------------------------------------------- virtio, vhost: features, fixes
vhost can now support legacy threading if enabled in Kconfig vsock memory allocation strategies for large buffers have been improved, reducing pressure on kmalloc vhost now supports the in-order feature guest bits missed the merge window
fixes, cleanups all over the place
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin mst@redhat.com
---------------------------------------------------------------- Alok Tiwari (4): virtio: Fix typo in register_virtio_device() doc comment vhost-scsi: Fix typos and formatting in comments and logs vhost: Fix typos vhost-scsi: Fix check for inline_sg_cnt exceeding preallocated limit
Anders Roxell (1): vdpa: Fix IDR memory leak in VDUSE module exit
Cindy Lu (1): vhost: Reintroduce kthread API and add mode selection
Dr. David Alan Gilbert (2): vhost: vringh: Remove unused iotlb functions vhost: vringh: Remove unused functions
Dragos Tatulea (2): vdpa/mlx5: Fix needs_teardown flag calculation vdpa/mlx5: Fix release of uninitialized resources on error path
Gerd Hoffmann (1): drm/virtio: implement virtio_gpu_shutdown
Jason Wang (3): vhost: fail early when __vhost_add_used() fails vhost: basic in order support vhost_net: basic in_order support
Michael S. Tsirkin (2): virtio: fix comments, readability virtio: document ENOSPC
Mike Christie (1): vhost-scsi: Fix log flooding with target does not exist errors
Pei Xiao (1): vhost: Use ERR_CAST inlined function instead of ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(...))
Viresh Kumar (2): virtio-mmio: Remove virtqueue list from mmio device virtio-vdpa: Remove virtqueue list
WangYuli (1): virtio: virtio_dma_buf: fix missing parameter documentation
Will Deacon (9): vhost/vsock: Avoid allocating arbitrarily-sized SKBs vsock/virtio: Validate length in packet header before skb_put() vsock/virtio: Move length check to callers of virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put() vsock/virtio: Resize receive buffers so that each SKB fits in a 4K page vsock/virtio: Rename virtio_vsock_alloc_skb() vsock/virtio: Move SKB allocation lower-bound check to callers vhost/vsock: Allocate nonlinear SKBs for handling large receive buffers vsock/virtio: Rename virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put() vsock/virtio: Allocate nonlinear SKBs for handling large transmit buffers
drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c | 8 +- drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mr.c | 3 + drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 12 +- drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c | 1 + drivers/vhost/Kconfig | 18 ++ drivers/vhost/net.c | 88 +++++--- drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 24 +- drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 377 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 30 ++- drivers/vhost/vringh.c | 118 ---------- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 15 +- drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 7 +- drivers/virtio/virtio_dma_buf.c | 2 + drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 52 +---- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 4 + drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c | 44 +--- include/linux/virtio.h | 2 +- include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 46 +++- include/linux/vringh.h | 12 - include/uapi/linux/vhost.h | 29 +++ kernel/vhost_task.c | 2 +- net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 20 +- net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 3 +- 23 files changed, 575 insertions(+), 342 deletions(-)
On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 at 06:13, Michael S. Tsirkin mst@redhat.com wrote:
drop commits that I put in there by mistake. Sorry!
Not only does this mean they were all recently rebased, absolutely *NONE* of this has been in linux-next as fat as I can tell. Not in a rebased form _or_ in the pre-rebased form.
So no. This is not acceptable, you can try again next time when you do it properly.
Linus
* Linus Torvalds (torvalds@linux-foundation.org) wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 at 06:13, Michael S. Tsirkin mst@redhat.com wrote:
drop commits that I put in there by mistake. Sorry!
Not only does this mean they were all recently rebased, absolutely *NONE* of this has been in linux-next as fat as I can tell. Not in a rebased form _or_ in the pre-rebased form.
My notes say that I saw my two vhost: vringh deadcode patches in -next on 2025-07-17.
Dave
So no. This is not acceptable, you can try again next time when you do it properly.
Linus
On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 at 14:01, Dr. David Alan Gilbert linux@treblig.org wrote:
My notes say that I saw my two vhost: vringh deadcode patches in -next on 2025-07-17.
Oh. My bad.
My linux-next head was not up-to-date: I had fetched the new state, but the branch was still pointing to the previous one.
My apologies - they are indeed there, and I was simply looking at stale state.
So while it's recently rebased, the commits have been in linux-next and I was just wrong.
Linus
On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 at 14:15, Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org wrote:
My apologies - they are indeed there, and I was simply looking at stale state.
So while it's recently rebased, the commits have been in linux-next and I was just wrong.
Pulled and pushed out. Sorry again for blaming Michael for my own incompetence.
Linus
The pull request you sent on Fri, 1 Aug 2025 09:13:18 -0400:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/821c9e515db512904250e1d460109a1dc4c7ef6b
Thank you!
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org