From: Johannes Berg johannes.berg@intel.com
Commit 7e7efdda6adb385fbdfd6f819d76bc68c923c394 upstream.
My prior race fix here broke CQM when ranges aren't used, as the reporting worker now requires the cqm_config to be set in the wdev, but isn't set when there's no range configured.
Rather than continuing to special-case the range version, set the cqm_config always and configure accordingly, also tracking if range was used or not to be able to clear the configuration appropriately with the same API, which was actually not right if both were implemented by a driver for some reason, as is the case with mac80211 (though there the implementations are equivalent so it doesn't matter.)
Also, the original multiple-RSSI commit lost checking for the callback, so might have potentially crashed if a driver had neither implementation, and userspace tried to use it despite not being advertised as supported.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 4a4b8169501b ("cfg80211: Accept multiple RSSI thresholds for CQM") Fixes: 37c20b2effe9 ("wifi: cfg80211: fix cqm_config access race") Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg johannes.berg@intel.com --- net/wireless/core.h | 1 + net/wireless/nl80211.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/wireless/core.h b/net/wireless/core.h index e1accacc6f23..ee980965a7cf 100644 --- a/net/wireless/core.h +++ b/net/wireless/core.h @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ struct cfg80211_cqm_config { u32 rssi_hyst; s32 last_rssi_event_value; enum nl80211_cqm_rssi_threshold_event last_rssi_event_type; + bool use_range_api; int n_rssi_thresholds; s32 rssi_thresholds[]; }; diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c index b19b5acfaf3a..42c858219b34 100644 --- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c +++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c @@ -12574,10 +12574,6 @@ static int cfg80211_cqm_rssi_update(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev, int i, n, low_index; int err;
- /* RSSI reporting disabled? */ - if (!cqm_config) - return rdev_set_cqm_rssi_range_config(rdev, dev, 0, 0); - /* * Obtain current RSSI value if possible, if not and no RSSI threshold * event has been received yet, we should receive an event after a @@ -12652,18 +12648,6 @@ static int nl80211_set_cqm_rssi(struct genl_info *info, wdev->iftype != NL80211_IFTYPE_P2P_CLIENT) return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- if (n_thresholds <= 1 && rdev->ops->set_cqm_rssi_config) { - if (n_thresholds == 0 || thresholds[0] == 0) /* Disabling */ - return rdev_set_cqm_rssi_config(rdev, dev, 0, 0); - - return rdev_set_cqm_rssi_config(rdev, dev, - thresholds[0], hysteresis); - } - - if (!wiphy_ext_feature_isset(&rdev->wiphy, - NL80211_EXT_FEATURE_CQM_RSSI_LIST)) - return -EOPNOTSUPP; - if (n_thresholds == 1 && thresholds[0] == 0) /* Disabling */ n_thresholds = 0;
@@ -12671,6 +12655,20 @@ static int nl80211_set_cqm_rssi(struct genl_info *info, old = rcu_dereference_protected(wdev->cqm_config, lockdep_is_held(&wdev->mtx));
+ /* if already disabled just succeed */ + if (!n_thresholds && !old) + return 0; + + if (n_thresholds > 1) { + if (!wiphy_ext_feature_isset(&rdev->wiphy, + NL80211_EXT_FEATURE_CQM_RSSI_LIST) || + !rdev->ops->set_cqm_rssi_range_config) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } else { + if (!rdev->ops->set_cqm_rssi_config) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + if (n_thresholds) { cqm_config = kzalloc(struct_size(cqm_config, rssi_thresholds, n_thresholds), @@ -12685,13 +12683,26 @@ static int nl80211_set_cqm_rssi(struct genl_info *info, memcpy(cqm_config->rssi_thresholds, thresholds, flex_array_size(cqm_config, rssi_thresholds, n_thresholds)); + cqm_config->use_range_api = n_thresholds > 1 || + !rdev->ops->set_cqm_rssi_config;
rcu_assign_pointer(wdev->cqm_config, cqm_config); + + if (cqm_config->use_range_api) + err = cfg80211_cqm_rssi_update(rdev, dev, cqm_config); + else + err = rdev_set_cqm_rssi_config(rdev, dev, + thresholds[0], + hysteresis); } else { RCU_INIT_POINTER(wdev->cqm_config, NULL); + /* if enabled as range also disable via range */ + if (old->use_range_api) + err = rdev_set_cqm_rssi_range_config(rdev, dev, 0, 0); + else + err = rdev_set_cqm_rssi_config(rdev, dev, 0, 0); }
- err = cfg80211_cqm_rssi_update(rdev, dev, cqm_config); if (err) { rcu_assign_pointer(wdev->cqm_config, old); kfree_rcu(cqm_config, rcu_head); @@ -18758,10 +18769,11 @@ void cfg80211_cqm_rssi_notify_work(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct wiphy_work *work) wdev_lock(wdev); cqm_config = rcu_dereference_protected(wdev->cqm_config, lockdep_is_held(&wdev->mtx)); - if (!wdev->cqm_config) + if (!cqm_config) goto unlock;
- cfg80211_cqm_rssi_update(rdev, wdev->netdev, cqm_config); + if (cqm_config->use_range_api) + cfg80211_cqm_rssi_update(rdev, wdev->netdev, cqm_config);
rssi_level = cqm_config->last_rssi_event_value; rssi_event = cqm_config->last_rssi_event_type;
Hi,
Thanks for your patch.
FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.
The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#opti...
Rule: The upstream commit ID must be specified with a separate line above the commit text. Subject: [PATCH 6.1,6.6] wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range use Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20231203190842.25478-2-johannes%40sipsolution...
Please ignore this mail if the patch is not relevant for upstream.
FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.
The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#opti...
Rule: The upstream commit ID must be specified with a separate line above the commit text. Subject: [PATCH 6.1,6.6] wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range use Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20231203190842.25478-2-johannes%40sipsolution...
OK, so I spelled it "Commit" and not "commit" ...?
johannes
On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 08:14:00PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.
The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#opti...
Rule: The upstream commit ID must be specified with a separate line above the commit text. Subject: [PATCH 6.1,6.6] wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range use Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20231203190842.25478-2-johannes%40sipsolution...
OK, so I spelled it "Commit" and not "commit" ...?
No, it just doesn't know to ignore messages like this. It's all good, I'll take it as-is, thanks!
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org