A few cleanups and a bugfix that are either suitable after the swap table phase I or found during code review.
Patch 1 is a bugfix and needs to be included in the stable branch, the rest have no behavior change.
--- Changes in v2: - Update commit message for patch 1, it's a sub-optimal fix and a better fix can be done later. [ Chris Li ] - Fix a lock balance issue in patch 1. [ YoungJun Park ] - Add a trivial cleanup patch to remove an unused argument, no behavior change. - Update kernel doc. - Fix minor issue with commit message [ Nhat Pham ] - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251007-swap-clean-after-swap-table-p1-v1-0-74860...
--- Kairui Song (5): mm, swap: do not perform synchronous discard during allocation mm, swap: rename helper for setup bad slots mm, swap: cleanup swap entry allocation parameter mm/migrate, swap: drop usage of folio_index mm, swap: remove redundant argument for isolating a cluster
include/linux/swap.h | 4 +-- mm/migrate.c | 4 +-- mm/shmem.c | 2 +- mm/swap.h | 21 ---------------- mm/swapfile.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- mm/vmscan.c | 4 +-- 6 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 5b5c3e53c939318f6a0698c895c7ec40758bff6a change-id: 20251007-swap-clean-after-swap-table-p1-b9a7635ee3fa
Best regards,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 02:00:38AM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
A few cleanups and a bugfix that are either suitable after the swap table phase I or found during code review.
Patch 1 is a bugfix and needs to be included in the stable branch, the rest have no behavior change.
Changes in v2:
- Update commit message for patch 1, it's a sub-optimal fix and a better fix can be done later. [ Chris Li ]
- Fix a lock balance issue in patch 1. [ YoungJun Park ]
- Add a trivial cleanup patch to remove an unused argument, no behavior change.
- Update kernel doc.
- Fix minor issue with commit message [ Nhat Pham ]
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251007-swap-clean-after-swap-table-p1-v1-0-74860...
Kairui Song (5): mm, swap: do not perform synchronous discard during allocation
FYI For some reason this commit is not present on lore, see [0]
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251024-swap-clean-after-swap-table-p1-v2-0-a70...
mm, swap: rename helper for setup bad slots mm, swap: cleanup swap entry allocation parameter mm/migrate, swap: drop usage of folio_index mm, swap: remove redundant argument for isolating a clusterinclude/linux/swap.h | 4 +-- mm/migrate.c | 4 +-- mm/shmem.c | 2 +- mm/swap.h | 21 ---------------- mm/swapfile.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- mm/vmscan.c | 4 +-- 6 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
base-commit: 5b5c3e53c939318f6a0698c895c7ec40758bff6a change-id: 20251007-swap-clean-after-swap-table-p1-b9a7635ee3fa
Best regards,
Kairui Song kasong@tencent.com
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 9:18 PM Lorenzo Stoakes lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 02:00:38AM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
A few cleanups and a bugfix that are either suitable after the swap table phase I or found during code review.
Patch 1 is a bugfix and needs to be included in the stable branch, the rest have no behavior change.
Changes in v2:
- Update commit message for patch 1, it's a sub-optimal fix and a better fix can be done later. [ Chris Li ]
- Fix a lock balance issue in patch 1. [ YoungJun Park ]
- Add a trivial cleanup patch to remove an unused argument, no behavior change.
- Update kernel doc.
- Fix minor issue with commit message [ Nhat Pham ]
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251007-swap-clean-after-swap-table-p1-v1-0-74860...
Kairui Song (5): mm, swap: do not perform synchronous discard during allocation
FYI For some reason this commit is not present on lore, see [0]
Thanks for letting me know, strangely, it is here: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251024-swap-clean-after-swap-table-p1-v2-1-c5b0e...
But the In-reply-to id is wrong. I'm using b4 and somehow patch 1 was blocked by gmail's SMTP so I had to try to resend patch 1 again, something went wrong with that part. I'll try to find out the problem and avoid that from happening again.
I'm seeing that patch 1 is being merged into mm tree just fine, I guess that should be OK.
If anyone is reading the threads, this url above should be helpful.
On 10/24/25 at 09:26pm, Kairui Song wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 9:18 PM Lorenzo Stoakes lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 02:00:38AM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
A few cleanups and a bugfix that are either suitable after the swap table phase I or found during code review.
Patch 1 is a bugfix and needs to be included in the stable branch, the rest have no behavior change.
Changes in v2:
- Update commit message for patch 1, it's a sub-optimal fix and a better fix can be done later. [ Chris Li ]
- Fix a lock balance issue in patch 1. [ YoungJun Park ]
- Add a trivial cleanup patch to remove an unused argument, no behavior change.
- Update kernel doc.
- Fix minor issue with commit message [ Nhat Pham ]
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251007-swap-clean-after-swap-table-p1-v1-0-74860...
Kairui Song (5): mm, swap: do not perform synchronous discard during allocation
FYI For some reason this commit is not present on lore, see [0]
Thanks for letting me know, strangely, it is here: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251024-swap-clean-after-swap-table-p1-v2-1-c5b0e...
I don't receive the patch 1/5, thanks to the link.
But the In-reply-to id is wrong. I'm using b4 and somehow patch 1 was blocked by gmail's SMTP so I had to try to resend patch 1 again, something went wrong with that part. I'll try to find out the problem and avoid that from happening again.
I'm seeing that patch 1 is being merged into mm tree just fine, I guess that should be OK.
If anyone is reading the threads, this url above should be helpful.
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org