On PowerVM, CPU-less nodes can be populated with hot-plugged CPUs at runtime. Today, the IPI is not created for such nodes, and hot-plugged CPUs use a bogus IPI, which leads to soft lockups.
We can not directly allocate and request the IPI on demand because bringup_up() is called under the IRQ sparse lock. The alternative is to allocate the IPIs for all possible nodes at startup and to request the mapping on demand when the first CPU of a node is brought up.
Fixes: 7dcc37b3eff9 ("powerpc/xive: Map one IPI interrupt per node") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.13 Reported-by: Geetika Moolchandani Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com Cc: Srikar Dronamraju srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Laurent Vivier lvivier@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater clg@kaod.org Message-Id: 20210629131542.743888-1-clg@kaod.org Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater clg@kaod.org --- arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c index dbdbbc2f1dc5..943fd30095af 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static struct irq_domain *xive_irq_domain; static struct xive_ipi_desc { unsigned int irq; char name[16]; + atomic_t started; } *xive_ipis;
/* @@ -1120,7 +1121,7 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops xive_ipi_irq_domain_ops = { .alloc = xive_ipi_irq_domain_alloc, };
-static int __init xive_request_ipi(void) +static int __init xive_init_ipis(void) { struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; struct irq_domain *ipi_domain; @@ -1144,10 +1145,6 @@ static int __init xive_request_ipi(void) struct xive_ipi_desc *xid = &xive_ipis[node]; struct xive_ipi_alloc_info info = { node };
- /* Skip nodes without CPUs */ - if (cpumask_empty(cpumask_of_node(node))) - continue; - /* * Map one IPI interrupt per node for all cpus of that node. * Since the HW interrupt number doesn't have any meaning, @@ -1159,11 +1156,6 @@ static int __init xive_request_ipi(void) xid->irq = ret;
snprintf(xid->name, sizeof(xid->name), "IPI-%d", node); - - ret = request_irq(xid->irq, xive_muxed_ipi_action, - IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NO_THREAD, xid->name, NULL); - - WARN(ret < 0, "Failed to request IPI %d: %d\n", xid->irq, ret); }
return ret; @@ -1178,6 +1170,22 @@ static int __init xive_request_ipi(void) return ret; }
+static int __init xive_request_ipi(unsigned int cpu) +{ + struct xive_ipi_desc *xid = &xive_ipis[early_cpu_to_node(cpu)]; + int ret; + + if (atomic_inc_return(&xid->started) > 1) + return 0; + + ret = request_irq(xid->irq, xive_muxed_ipi_action, + IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NO_THREAD, + xid->name, NULL); + + WARN(ret < 0, "Failed to request IPI %d: %d\n", xid->irq, ret); + return ret; +} + static int xive_setup_cpu_ipi(unsigned int cpu) { unsigned int xive_ipi_irq = xive_ipi_cpu_to_irq(cpu); @@ -1192,6 +1200,9 @@ static int xive_setup_cpu_ipi(unsigned int cpu) if (xc->hw_ipi != XIVE_BAD_IRQ) return 0;
+ /* Register the IPI */ + xive_request_ipi(cpu); + /* Grab an IPI from the backend, this will populate xc->hw_ipi */ if (xive_ops->get_ipi(cpu, xc)) return -EIO; @@ -1231,6 +1242,8 @@ static void xive_cleanup_cpu_ipi(unsigned int cpu, struct xive_cpu *xc) if (xc->hw_ipi == XIVE_BAD_IRQ) return;
+ /* TODO: clear IPI mapping */ + /* Mask the IPI */ xive_do_source_set_mask(&xc->ipi_data, true);
@@ -1253,7 +1266,7 @@ void __init xive_smp_probe(void) smp_ops->cause_ipi = xive_cause_ipi;
/* Register the IPI */ - xive_request_ipi(); + xive_init_ipis();
/* Allocate and setup IPI for the boot CPU */ xive_setup_cpu_ipi(smp_processor_id());
On 07/08/2021 09:20, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On PowerVM, CPU-less nodes can be populated with hot-plugged CPUs at runtime. Today, the IPI is not created for such nodes, and hot-plugged CPUs use a bogus IPI, which leads to soft lockups.
We can not directly allocate and request the IPI on demand because bringup_up() is called under the IRQ sparse lock. The alternative is to allocate the IPIs for all possible nodes at startup and to request the mapping on demand when the first CPU of a node is brought up.
Fixes: 7dcc37b3eff9 ("powerpc/xive: Map one IPI interrupt per node") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.13 Reported-by: Geetika Moolchandani Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com Cc: Srikar Dronamraju srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Laurent Vivier lvivier@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater clg@kaod.org Message-Id: 20210629131542.743888-1-clg@kaod.org Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater clg@kaod.org
arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c index dbdbbc2f1dc5..943fd30095af 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static struct irq_domain *xive_irq_domain; static struct xive_ipi_desc { unsigned int irq; char name[16];
- atomic_t started;
} *xive_ipis; /* @@ -1120,7 +1121,7 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops xive_ipi_irq_domain_ops = { .alloc = xive_ipi_irq_domain_alloc, }; -static int __init xive_request_ipi(void) +static int __init xive_init_ipis(void) { struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; struct irq_domain *ipi_domain; @@ -1144,10 +1145,6 @@ static int __init xive_request_ipi(void) struct xive_ipi_desc *xid = &xive_ipis[node]; struct xive_ipi_alloc_info info = { node };
/* Skip nodes without CPUs */if (cpumask_empty(cpumask_of_node(node)))continue;- /*
- Map one IPI interrupt per node for all cpus of that node.
- Since the HW interrupt number doesn't have any meaning,
@@ -1159,11 +1156,6 @@ static int __init xive_request_ipi(void) xid->irq = ret; snprintf(xid->name, sizeof(xid->name), "IPI-%d", node);
ret = request_irq(xid->irq, xive_muxed_ipi_action,IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NO_THREAD, xid->name, NULL);WARN(ret < 0, "Failed to request IPI %d: %d\n", xid->irq, ret);return ret; @@ -1178,6 +1170,22 @@ static int __init xive_request_ipi(void) return ret; } +static int __init xive_request_ipi(unsigned int cpu) +{
- struct xive_ipi_desc *xid = &xive_ipis[early_cpu_to_node(cpu)];
- int ret;
- if (atomic_inc_return(&xid->started) > 1)
return 0;- ret = request_irq(xid->irq, xive_muxed_ipi_action,
IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NO_THREAD,xid->name, NULL);- WARN(ret < 0, "Failed to request IPI %d: %d\n", xid->irq, ret);
- return ret;
+}
static int xive_setup_cpu_ipi(unsigned int cpu) { unsigned int xive_ipi_irq = xive_ipi_cpu_to_irq(cpu); @@ -1192,6 +1200,9 @@ static int xive_setup_cpu_ipi(unsigned int cpu) if (xc->hw_ipi != XIVE_BAD_IRQ) return 0;
- /* Register the IPI */
- xive_request_ipi(cpu);
- /* Grab an IPI from the backend, this will populate xc->hw_ipi */ if (xive_ops->get_ipi(cpu, xc)) return -EIO;
@@ -1231,6 +1242,8 @@ static void xive_cleanup_cpu_ipi(unsigned int cpu, struct xive_cpu *xc) if (xc->hw_ipi == XIVE_BAD_IRQ) return;
- /* TODO: clear IPI mapping */
- /* Mask the IPI */ xive_do_source_set_mask(&xc->ipi_data, true);
@@ -1253,7 +1266,7 @@ void __init xive_smp_probe(void) smp_ops->cause_ipi = xive_cause_ipi; /* Register the IPI */
- xive_request_ipi();
- xive_init_ipis();
/* Allocate and setup IPI for the boot CPU */ xive_setup_cpu_ipi(smp_processor_id());
Tested-by: Laurent Vivier lvivier@redhat.com
* C?dric Le Goater clg@kaod.org [2021-08-07 09:20:57]:
On PowerVM, CPU-less nodes can be populated with hot-plugged CPUs at runtime. Today, the IPI is not created for such nodes, and hot-plugged CPUs use a bogus IPI, which leads to soft lockups.
We can not directly allocate and request the IPI on demand because bringup_up() is called under the IRQ sparse lock. The alternative is to allocate the IPIs for all possible nodes at startup and to request the mapping on demand when the first CPU of a node is brought up.
Thank you, this version too works for me.
Tested-by: Srikar Dronamraju srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Fixes: 7dcc37b3eff9 ("powerpc/xive: Map one IPI interrupt per node") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.13 Reported-by: Geetika Moolchandani Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com Cc: Srikar Dronamraju srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Laurent Vivier lvivier@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater clg@kaod.org Message-Id: 20210629131542.743888-1-clg@kaod.org Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater clg@kaod.org
arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c index dbdbbc2f1dc5..943fd30095af 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static struct irq_domain *xive_irq_domain; static struct xive_ipi_desc { unsigned int irq; char name[16];
- atomic_t started;
} *xive_ipis; /* @@ -1120,7 +1121,7 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops xive_ipi_irq_domain_ops = { .alloc = xive_ipi_irq_domain_alloc, }; -static int __init xive_request_ipi(void) +static int __init xive_init_ipis(void) { struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; struct irq_domain *ipi_domain; @@ -1144,10 +1145,6 @@ static int __init xive_request_ipi(void) struct xive_ipi_desc *xid = &xive_ipis[node]; struct xive_ipi_alloc_info info = { node };
/* Skip nodes without CPUs */if (cpumask_empty(cpumask_of_node(node)))continue;- /*
- Map one IPI interrupt per node for all cpus of that node.
- Since the HW interrupt number doesn't have any meaning,
@@ -1159,11 +1156,6 @@ static int __init xive_request_ipi(void) xid->irq = ret; snprintf(xid->name, sizeof(xid->name), "IPI-%d", node);
ret = request_irq(xid->irq, xive_muxed_ipi_action,IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NO_THREAD, xid->name, NULL);WARN(ret < 0, "Failed to request IPI %d: %d\n", xid->irq, ret);return ret; @@ -1178,6 +1170,22 @@ static int __init xive_request_ipi(void) return ret; } +static int __init xive_request_ipi(unsigned int cpu) +{
- struct xive_ipi_desc *xid = &xive_ipis[early_cpu_to_node(cpu)];
- int ret;
- if (atomic_inc_return(&xid->started) > 1)
return 0;- ret = request_irq(xid->irq, xive_muxed_ipi_action,
IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NO_THREAD,xid->name, NULL);- WARN(ret < 0, "Failed to request IPI %d: %d\n", xid->irq, ret);
- return ret;
+}
static int xive_setup_cpu_ipi(unsigned int cpu) { unsigned int xive_ipi_irq = xive_ipi_cpu_to_irq(cpu); @@ -1192,6 +1200,9 @@ static int xive_setup_cpu_ipi(unsigned int cpu) if (xc->hw_ipi != XIVE_BAD_IRQ) return 0;
- /* Register the IPI */
- xive_request_ipi(cpu);
- /* Grab an IPI from the backend, this will populate xc->hw_ipi */ if (xive_ops->get_ipi(cpu, xc)) return -EIO;
@@ -1231,6 +1242,8 @@ static void xive_cleanup_cpu_ipi(unsigned int cpu, struct xive_cpu *xc) if (xc->hw_ipi == XIVE_BAD_IRQ) return;
- /* TODO: clear IPI mapping */
- /* Mask the IPI */ xive_do_source_set_mask(&xc->ipi_data, true);
@@ -1253,7 +1266,7 @@ void __init xive_smp_probe(void) smp_ops->cause_ipi = xive_cause_ipi; /* Register the IPI */
- xive_request_ipi();
- xive_init_ipis();
/* Allocate and setup IPI for the boot CPU */ xive_setup_cpu_ipi(smp_processor_id()); -- 2.31.1
On 8/7/21 9:20 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On PowerVM, CPU-less nodes can be populated with hot-plugged CPUs at runtime. Today, the IPI is not created for such nodes, and hot-plugged CPUs use a bogus IPI, which leads to soft lockups.
We can not directly allocate and request the IPI on demand because bringup_up() is called under the IRQ sparse lock. The alternative is to allocate the IPIs for all possible nodes at startup and to request the mapping on demand when the first CPU of a node is brought up.
Fixes: 7dcc37b3eff9 ("powerpc/xive: Map one IPI interrupt per node") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.13 Reported-by: Geetika Moolchandani Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com Cc: Srikar Dronamraju srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Laurent Vivier lvivier@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater clg@kaod.org Message-Id: 20210629131542.743888-1-clg@kaod.org Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater clg@kaod.org
arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
I forgot to add that this version does break irqbalance anymore, since Linux is not mapping interrupts of CPU-less nodes.
Anyhow, irqbalance is now fixed :
https://github.com/Irqbalance/irqbalance/commit/a7f81483a95a94d6a62ca7fb999a...
So v1 (plus irqbalance patch above) or v2 are safe to use. I do prefer v2.
Thanks to Laurent and Srikar for the extra tests,
C.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c index dbdbbc2f1dc5..943fd30095af 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static struct irq_domain *xive_irq_domain; static struct xive_ipi_desc { unsigned int irq; char name[16];
- atomic_t started;
} *xive_ipis; /* @@ -1120,7 +1121,7 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops xive_ipi_irq_domain_ops = { .alloc = xive_ipi_irq_domain_alloc, }; -static int __init xive_request_ipi(void) +static int __init xive_init_ipis(void) { struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; struct irq_domain *ipi_domain; @@ -1144,10 +1145,6 @@ static int __init xive_request_ipi(void) struct xive_ipi_desc *xid = &xive_ipis[node]; struct xive_ipi_alloc_info info = { node };
/* Skip nodes without CPUs */if (cpumask_empty(cpumask_of_node(node)))continue;- /*
- Map one IPI interrupt per node for all cpus of that node.
- Since the HW interrupt number doesn't have any meaning,
@@ -1159,11 +1156,6 @@ static int __init xive_request_ipi(void) xid->irq = ret; snprintf(xid->name, sizeof(xid->name), "IPI-%d", node);
ret = request_irq(xid->irq, xive_muxed_ipi_action,IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NO_THREAD, xid->name, NULL);WARN(ret < 0, "Failed to request IPI %d: %d\n", xid->irq, ret);return ret; @@ -1178,6 +1170,22 @@ static int __init xive_request_ipi(void) return ret; } +static int __init xive_request_ipi(unsigned int cpu) +{
- struct xive_ipi_desc *xid = &xive_ipis[early_cpu_to_node(cpu)];
- int ret;
- if (atomic_inc_return(&xid->started) > 1)
return 0;- ret = request_irq(xid->irq, xive_muxed_ipi_action,
IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NO_THREAD,xid->name, NULL);- WARN(ret < 0, "Failed to request IPI %d: %d\n", xid->irq, ret);
- return ret;
+}
static int xive_setup_cpu_ipi(unsigned int cpu) { unsigned int xive_ipi_irq = xive_ipi_cpu_to_irq(cpu); @@ -1192,6 +1200,9 @@ static int xive_setup_cpu_ipi(unsigned int cpu) if (xc->hw_ipi != XIVE_BAD_IRQ) return 0;
- /* Register the IPI */
- xive_request_ipi(cpu);
- /* Grab an IPI from the backend, this will populate xc->hw_ipi */ if (xive_ops->get_ipi(cpu, xc)) return -EIO;
@@ -1231,6 +1242,8 @@ static void xive_cleanup_cpu_ipi(unsigned int cpu, struct xive_cpu *xc) if (xc->hw_ipi == XIVE_BAD_IRQ) return;
- /* TODO: clear IPI mapping */
- /* Mask the IPI */ xive_do_source_set_mask(&xc->ipi_data, true);
@@ -1253,7 +1266,7 @@ void __init xive_smp_probe(void) smp_ops->cause_ipi = xive_cause_ipi; /* Register the IPI */
- xive_request_ipi();
- xive_init_ipis();
/* Allocate and setup IPI for the boot CPU */ xive_setup_cpu_ipi(smp_processor_id());
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Cédric Le Goater -
Laurent Vivier -
Srikar Dronamraju