Add missing of_node_put() call to release the device node reference obtained via of_parse_phandle().
Fixes: ed69bdd8fd9b ("drivers: bus: add ARM CCI support") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin linmq006@gmail.com --- drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c index b8184a903583..af180f884f1d 100644 --- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c @@ -163,14 +163,18 @@ static int __cci_ace_get_port(struct device_node *dn, int type) int i; bool ace_match; struct device_node *cci_portn; + int ret = -ENODEV;
cci_portn = of_parse_phandle(dn, "cci-control-port", 0); for (i = 0; i < nb_cci_ports; i++) { ace_match = ports[i].type == type; - if (ace_match && cci_portn == ports[i].dn) - return i; + if (ace_match && cci_portn == ports[i].dn) { + ret = i; + break; + } } - return -ENODEV; + of_node_put(cci_portn); + return ret; }
int cci_ace_get_port(struct device_node *dn)
Add missing of_node_put() call to release the device node reference obtained via of_parse_phandle().
1. You may occasionally put more than 58 characters into text lines of such a change description. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Docu...
2. Would you like to increase the application of scope-based resource management? https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17-rc4/source/include/linux/of.h#L138
3. How do you think about to append parentheses to the function name in the summary phrase?
Regards, Markus
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 11:44:10AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
Add missing of_node_put() call to release the device node reference obtained via of_parse_phandle().
You may occasionally put more than 58 characters into text lines of such a change description. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Docu...
Would you like to increase the application of scope-based resource management? https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17-rc4/source/include/linux/of.h#L138
How do you think about to append parentheses to the function name in the summary phrase?
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org