From: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@ti.com
Like paRAM slots, channels could be used by other cores and in this case we need to make sure that the driver do not alter these channels.
Handle the generic dma-channel-mask property to mark channels in a bitmap which can not be used by Linux and convert the legacy rsv_chans if it is provided by platform_data.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@ti.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191025073056.25450-4-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul vkoul@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Hardik Gohil hgohil@mvista.com --- The patch [dmaengine: ti: edma: Add some null pointer checks to the edma_probe] fix for CVE-2024-26771 needs to be backported to v5.4.y kernel.
patch 2/3 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=v... patch 3/3 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=l...
patch 2 and 3 are cleanly applicable to v5.4.y, build test was sucessful.
drivers/dma/ti/edma.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/edma.c b/drivers/dma/ti/edma.c index 01089e5c565f..47423bbd7bc7 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/ti/edma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/edma.c @@ -259,6 +259,13 @@ struct edma_cc { */ unsigned long *slot_inuse;
+ /* + * For tracking reserved channels used by DSP. + * If the bit is cleared, the channel is allocated to be used by DSP + * and Linux must not touch it. + */ + unsigned long *channels_mask; + struct dma_device dma_slave; struct dma_device *dma_memcpy; struct edma_chan *slave_chans; @@ -715,6 +722,12 @@ static int edma_alloc_channel(struct edma_chan *echan, struct edma_cc *ecc = echan->ecc; int channel = EDMA_CHAN_SLOT(echan->ch_num);
+ if (!test_bit(echan->ch_num, ecc->channels_mask)) { + dev_err(ecc->dev, "Channel%d is reserved, can not be used!\n", + echan->ch_num); + return -EINVAL; + } + /* ensure access through shadow region 0 */ edma_or_array2(ecc, EDMA_DRAE, 0, EDMA_REG_ARRAY_INDEX(channel), EDMA_CHANNEL_BIT(channel)); @@ -2249,7 +2262,7 @@ static int edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct edma_soc_info *info = pdev->dev.platform_data; s8 (*queue_priority_mapping)[2]; int i, off; - const s16 (*rsv_slots)[2]; + const s16 (*reserved)[2]; const s16 (*xbar_chans)[2]; int irq; char *irq_name; @@ -2330,15 +2343,32 @@ static int edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!ecc->slot_inuse) return -ENOMEM;
+ ecc->channels_mask = devm_kcalloc(dev, + BITS_TO_LONGS(ecc->num_channels), + sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ecc->channels_mask) + return -ENOMEM; + + /* Mark all channels available initially */ + bitmap_fill(ecc->channels_mask, ecc->num_channels); + ecc->default_queue = info->default_queue;
if (info->rsv) { /* Set the reserved slots in inuse list */ - rsv_slots = info->rsv->rsv_slots; - if (rsv_slots) { - for (i = 0; rsv_slots[i][0] != -1; i++) - bitmap_set(ecc->slot_inuse, rsv_slots[i][0], - rsv_slots[i][1]); + reserved = info->rsv->rsv_slots; + if (reserved) { + for (i = 0; reserved[i][0] != -1; i++) + bitmap_set(ecc->slot_inuse, reserved[i][0], + reserved[i][1]); + } + + /* Clear channels not usable for Linux */ + reserved = info->rsv->rsv_chans; + if (reserved) { + for (i = 0; reserved[i][0] != -1; i++) + bitmap_clear(ecc->channels_mask, reserved[i][0], + reserved[i][1]); } }
@@ -2398,6 +2428,7 @@ static int edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!ecc->legacy_mode) { int lowest_priority = 0; + unsigned int array_max; struct of_phandle_args tc_args;
ecc->tc_list = devm_kcalloc(dev, ecc->num_tc, @@ -2421,6 +2452,18 @@ static int edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } of_node_put(tc_args.np); } + + /* See if we have optional dma-channel-mask array */ + array_max = DIV_ROUND_UP(ecc->num_channels, BITS_PER_TYPE(u32)); + ret = of_property_read_variable_u32_array(node, + "dma-channel-mask", + (u32 *)ecc->channels_mask, + 1, array_max); + if (ret > 0 && ret != array_max) + dev_warn(dev, "dma-channel-mask is not complete.\n"); + else if (ret == -EOVERFLOW || ret == -ENODATA) + dev_warn(dev, + "dma-channel-mask is out of range or empty\n"); }
/* Event queue priority mapping */ @@ -2438,6 +2481,10 @@ static int edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) edma_dma_init(ecc, legacy_mode);
for (i = 0; i < ecc->num_channels; i++) { + /* Do not touch reserved channels */ + if (!test_bit(i, ecc->channels_mask)) + continue; + /* Assign all channels to the default queue */ edma_assign_channel_eventq(&ecc->slave_chans[i], info->default_queue);
[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
Summary of potential issues: ⚠️ Found matching upstream commit but patch is missing proper reference to it
Found matching upstream commit: 31f4b28f6c41f734957ea66ac84c6abb69e696f0
WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and found commit: Backport author: Hardik Gohilhgohil@mvista.com Commit author: Peter Ujfalusipeter.ujfalusi@ti.com
Status in newer kernel trees: 6.14.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.13.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.12.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.6.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.1.y | Present (exact SHA1) 5.15.y | Present (exact SHA1) 5.10.y | Present (exact SHA1)
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit: --- 1: 31f4b28f6c41f ! 1: b6e5827c1f15c dmaengine: ti: edma: Add support for handling reserved channels @@ Commit message Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@ti.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191025073056.25450-4-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul vkoul@kernel.org + Signed-off-by: Hardik Gohil hgohil@mvista.com
## drivers/dma/ti/edma.c ## @@ drivers/dma/ti/edma.c: struct edma_cc { @@ drivers/dma/ti/edma.c: static int edma_alloc_channel(struct edma_chan *echan, edma_or_array2(ecc, EDMA_DRAE, 0, EDMA_REG_ARRAY_INDEX(channel), EDMA_CHANNEL_BIT(channel)); @@ drivers/dma/ti/edma.c: static int edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) - { struct edma_soc_info *info = pdev->dev.platform_data; s8 (*queue_priority_mapping)[2]; + int i, off; - const s16 (*rsv_slots)[2]; -+ const s16 (*reserved)[2]; - int i, irq; ++ const s16 (*reserved)[2]; + const s16 (*xbar_chans)[2]; + int irq; char *irq_name; - struct resource *mem; @@ drivers/dma/ti/edma.c: static int edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!ecc->slot_inuse) return -ENOMEM; @@ drivers/dma/ti/edma.c: static int edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ecc->tc_list = devm_kcalloc(dev, ecc->num_tc, @@ drivers/dma/ti/edma.c: static int edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) - info->default_queue = i; } + of_node_put(tc_args.np); } + + /* See if we have optional dma-channel-mask array */ ---
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test | |---------------------------|-------------|------------| | stable/linux-5.4.y | Success | Success |
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 06:43:25AM +0000, Hardik Gohil wrote:
From: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@ti.com
Like paRAM slots, channels could be used by other cores and in this case we need to make sure that the driver do not alter these channels.
Handle the generic dma-channel-mask property to mark channels in a bitmap which can not be used by Linux and convert the legacy rsv_chans if it is provided by platform_data.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@ti.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191025073056.25450-4-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul vkoul@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Hardik Gohil hgohil@mvista.com
The patch [dmaengine: ti: edma: Add some null pointer checks to the edma_probe] fix for CVE-2024-26771 needs to be backported to v5.4.y kernel.
patch 2/3 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=v... patch 3/3 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=l...
patch 2 and 3 are cleanly applicable to v5.4.y, build test was sucessful.
I'm sorry, I have no idea what to do here :(
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org