The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 9265fed6db601ee2ec47577815387458ef4f047a # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to 'stable@vger.kernel.org' --in-reply-to '2024110926-shortness-stark-e2ea@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 9265fed6db601ee2ec47577815387458ef4f047a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jarkko Sakkinen jarkko@kernel.org Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 02:16:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] tpm: Lock TPM chip in tpm_pm_suspend() first

Setting TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SUSPENDED in the end of tpm_pm_suspend() can be racy according, as this leaves window for tpm_hwrng_read() to be called while the operation is in progress. The recent bug report gives also evidence of this behaviour.

Aadress this by locking the TPM chip before checking any chip->flags both in tpm_pm_suspend() and tpm_hwrng_read(). Move TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SUSPENDED check inside tpm_get_random() so that it will be always checked only when the lock is reserved.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.4+ Fixes: 99d464506255 ("tpm: Prevent hwrng from activating during resume") Reported-by: Mike Seo mikeseohyungjin@gmail.com Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219383 Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar jsnitsel@redhat.com Tested-by: Mike Seo mikeseohyungjin@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen jarkko@kernel.org

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c index 1ff99a7091bb..7df7abaf3e52 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c @@ -525,10 +525,6 @@ static int tpm_hwrng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *data, size_t max, bool wait) { struct tpm_chip *chip = container_of(rng, struct tpm_chip, hwrng);

- /* Give back zero bytes, as TPM chip has not yet fully resumed: */ - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SUSPENDED) - return 0; - return tpm_get_random(chip, data, max); }

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c index 8134f002b121..b1daa0d7b341 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c @@ -370,6 +370,13 @@ int tpm_pm_suspend(struct device *dev) if (!chip) return -ENODEV;

+ rc = tpm_try_get_ops(chip); + if (rc) { + /* Can be safely set out of locks, as no action cannot race: */ + chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SUSPENDED; + goto out; + } + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_ALWAYS_POWERED) goto suspended;

@@ -377,21 +384,19 @@ int tpm_pm_suspend(struct device *dev) !pm_suspend_via_firmware()) goto suspended;

- rc = tpm_try_get_ops(chip); - if (!rc) { - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) { - tpm2_end_auth_session(chip); - tpm2_shutdown(chip, TPM2_SU_STATE); - } else { - rc = tpm1_pm_suspend(chip, tpm_suspend_pcr); - } - - tpm_put_ops(chip); + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) { + tpm2_end_auth_session(chip); + tpm2_shutdown(chip, TPM2_SU_STATE); + goto suspended; }

+ rc = tpm1_pm_suspend(chip, tpm_suspend_pcr); + suspended: chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SUSPENDED; + tpm_put_ops(chip);

+out: if (rc) dev_err(dev, "Ignoring error %d while suspending\n", rc); return 0; @@ -440,11 +445,18 @@ int tpm_get_random(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *out, size_t max) if (!chip) return -ENODEV;

+ /* Give back zero bytes, as TPM chip has not yet fully resumed: */ + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SUSPENDED) { + rc = 0; + goto out; + } + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) rc = tpm2_get_random(chip, out, max); else rc = tpm1_get_random(chip, out, max);

+out: tpm_put_ops(chip); return rc; }