Hello,
We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
Kernel repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Commit: 61d06c60569f - Linux 5.2.10-rc1
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: FAILED (see details below) Merge: OK Compile: OK Tests: FAILED
All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/108998
One or more kernel tests failed:
aarch64: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
ppc64le: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
x86_64: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
We hope that these logs can help you find the problem quickly. For the full detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of this message.
Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.
,-. ,-. ( C ) ( K ) Continuous `-',-.`-' Kernel ( I ) Integration `-' ______________________________________________________________________________
Compile testing ---------------
We compiled the kernel for 3 architectures:
aarch64: make options: -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
ppc64le: make options: -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
x86_64: make options: -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
Hardware testing ---------------- We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:
aarch64: Host 1: ❌ Boot test [0] ⚡⚡⚡ Podman system integration test (as root) [1] ⚡⚡⚡ Podman system integration test (as user) [1] ⚡⚡⚡ LTP lite [2] ⚡⚡⚡ Loopdev Sanity [3] ⚡⚡⚡ jvm test suite [4] ⚡⚡⚡ Memory function: memfd_create [5] ⚡⚡⚡ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility) [6] ⚡⚡⚡ LTP: openposix test suite [7] ⚡⚡⚡ Ethernet drivers sanity [8] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking socket: fuzz [9] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking sctp-auth: sockopts test [10] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking: igmp conformance test [11] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking TCP: keepalive test [12] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking UDP: socket [13] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking tunnel: gre basic [14] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking tunnel: vxlan basic [15] ⚡⚡⚡ audit: audit testsuite test [16] ⚡⚡⚡ httpd: mod_ssl smoke sanity [17] ⚡⚡⚡ iotop: sanity [18] ⚡⚡⚡ tuned: tune-processes-through-perf [19] ⚡⚡⚡ Usex - version 1.9-29 [20] ⚡⚡⚡ storage: SCSI VPD [21] ⚡⚡⚡ stress: stress-ng [22] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking route: pmtu [23] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking route_func: local [24] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking route_func: forward [24] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test [25] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking ipsec: basic netns transport [26] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking ipsec: basic netns tunnel [26] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ trace: ftrace/tracer [27]
Host 2: ❌ Boot test [0] ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests: ext4 [28] ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests: xfs [28] ⚡⚡⚡ selinux-policy: serge-testsuite [29] ⚡⚡⚡ lvm thinp sanity [30] ⚡⚡⚡ storage: software RAID testing [31] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage blktests [32]
ppc64le: Host 1: ❌ Boot test [0] ⚡⚡⚡ Podman system integration test (as root) [1] ⚡⚡⚡ Podman system integration test (as user) [1] ⚡⚡⚡ LTP lite [2] ⚡⚡⚡ Loopdev Sanity [3] ⚡⚡⚡ jvm test suite [4] ⚡⚡⚡ Memory function: memfd_create [5] ⚡⚡⚡ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility) [6] ⚡⚡⚡ LTP: openposix test suite [7] ⚡⚡⚡ Ethernet drivers sanity [8] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking socket: fuzz [9] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking sctp-auth: sockopts test [10] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking TCP: keepalive test [12] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking UDP: socket [13] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking tunnel: gre basic [14] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking tunnel: vxlan basic [15] ⚡⚡⚡ audit: audit testsuite test [16] ⚡⚡⚡ httpd: mod_ssl smoke sanity [17] ⚡⚡⚡ iotop: sanity [18] ⚡⚡⚡ tuned: tune-processes-through-perf [19] ⚡⚡⚡ Usex - version 1.9-29 [20] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking route: pmtu [23] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking route_func: local [24] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking route_func: forward [24] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test [25] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking ipsec: basic netns tunnel [26] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ trace: ftrace/tracer [27]
Host 2: ❌ Boot test [0] ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests: ext4 [28] ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests: xfs [28] ⚡⚡⚡ selinux-policy: serge-testsuite [29] ⚡⚡⚡ lvm thinp sanity [30] ⚡⚡⚡ storage: software RAID testing [31] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage blktests [32]
x86_64: Host 1: ❌ Boot test [0] ⚡⚡⚡ Podman system integration test (as root) [1] ⚡⚡⚡ Podman system integration test (as user) [1] ⚡⚡⚡ LTP lite [2] ⚡⚡⚡ Loopdev Sanity [3] ⚡⚡⚡ jvm test suite [4] ⚡⚡⚡ Memory function: memfd_create [5] ⚡⚡⚡ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility) [6] ⚡⚡⚡ LTP: openposix test suite [7] ⚡⚡⚡ Ethernet drivers sanity [8] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking socket: fuzz [9] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking sctp-auth: sockopts test [10] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking: igmp conformance test [11] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking TCP: keepalive test [12] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking UDP: socket [13] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking tunnel: gre basic [14] ⚡⚡⚡ Networking tunnel: vxlan basic [15] ⚡⚡⚡ audit: audit testsuite test [16] ⚡⚡⚡ httpd: mod_ssl smoke sanity [17] ⚡⚡⚡ iotop: sanity [18] ⚡⚡⚡ tuned: tune-processes-through-perf [19] ⚡⚡⚡ pciutils: sanity smoke test [33] ⚡⚡⚡ Usex - version 1.9-29 [20] ⚡⚡⚡ storage: SCSI VPD [21] ⚡⚡⚡ stress: stress-ng [22] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking route: pmtu [23] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking route_func: local [24] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking route_func: forward [24] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test [25] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking ipsec: basic netns transport [26] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking ipsec: basic netns tunnel [26] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ trace: ftrace/tracer [27]
Host 2: ❌ Boot test [0] ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests: ext4 [28] ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests: xfs [28] ⚡⚡⚡ selinux-policy: serge-testsuite [29] ⚡⚡⚡ lvm thinp sanity [30] ⚡⚡⚡ storage: software RAID testing [31] 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage blktests [32]
Test source: 💚 Pull requests are welcome for new tests or improvements to existing tests! [0]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#distribution/... [1]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#/container/po... [2]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#distribution/... [3]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#filesystems/l... [4]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#/jvm [5]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#/memory/funct... [6]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#misc/amtu [7]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#distribution/... [8]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#/networking/d... [9]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#/networking/s... [10]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#networking/sc... [11]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#networking/ig... [12]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#networking/tc... [13]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#networking/ud... [14]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#/networking/t... [15]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#/networking/t... [16]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#packages/audi... [17]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#packages/http... [18]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#packages/ioto... [19]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#packages/tune... [20]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#standards/use... [21]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#storage/scsi/... [22]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#stress/stress... [23]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#/networking/r... [24]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#/networking/r... [25]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#/networking/t... [26]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#/networking/i... [27]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#trace/ftrace/... [28]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#/filesystems/... [29]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#/packages/sel... [30]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#storage/lvm/t... [31]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#storage/swrai... [32]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#storage/blk [33]: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/archive/master.zip#pciutils/sani...
Waived tests ------------ If the test run included waived tests, they are marked with 🚧. Such tests are executed but their results are not taken into account. Tests are waived when their results are not reliable enough, e.g. when they're just introduced or are being fixed.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 02:31:22PM -0400, CKI Project wrote:
Hello,
We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
Kernel repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Commit: 61d06c60569f - Linux 5.2.10-rc1The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: FAILED (see details below) Merge: OK Compile: OK Tests: FAILEDAll kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/108998
One or more kernel tests failed:
aarch64: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
ppc64le: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
x86_64: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
Are these all real?
On 8/18/19 8:49 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 02:31:22PM -0400, CKI Project wrote:
Hello,
We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
Kernel repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Commit: 61d06c60569f - Linux 5.2.10-rc1The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: FAILED (see details below) Merge: OK Compile: OK Tests: FAILEDAll kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/108998
One or more kernel tests failed:
aarch64: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
ppc64le: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
x86_64: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
Are these all real?
Hi Greg,
the current 5.2-queue also fails to boot for me when applied to 5.2.9, so this is not a false positive. I had a handful of the queued patches in my own tree and know which ones work in 5.2.9, but the new ones for -mm look like they could cause problems. I'll try a few things..
-h
On 8/18/19 10:38 PM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
On 8/18/19 8:49 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 02:31:22PM -0400, CKI Project wrote:
Hello,
We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
Kernel repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Commit: 61d06c60569f - Linux 5.2.10-rc1
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: FAILED (see details below) Merge: OK Compile: OK Tests: FAILED
All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/108998
One or more kernel tests failed:
aarch64: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
ppc64le: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
x86_64: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
Are these all real?
Hi Greg,
the current 5.2-queue also fails to boot for me when applied to 5.2.9, so this is not a false positive. I had a handful of the queued patches in my own tree and know which ones work in 5.2.9, but the new ones for -mm look like they could cause problems. I'll try a few things..
The culprit is "exit-make-setting-exit_state-consistent.patch", which was successfully added everywhere. This explains why KCI is consistently sad everywhere, too. :)
Removing that patch from the queue results in a working kernel (with the version updated by me):
$cat /proc/version Linux version 5.2.10 (root@ragnarok) (gcc version 9.2.0 (Gentoo 9.2.0 p1)) #1 SMP Sun Aug 18 23:50:50 CEST 2019
-h
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 11:57:05PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
On 8/18/19 10:38 PM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
On 8/18/19 8:49 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 02:31:22PM -0400, CKI Project wrote:
Hello,
We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
Kernel repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Commit: 61d06c60569f - Linux 5.2.10-rc1
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: FAILED (see details below) Merge: OK Compile: OK Tests: FAILED
All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/108998
One or more kernel tests failed:
aarch64: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
ppc64le: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
x86_64: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
Are these all real?
Hi Greg,
the current 5.2-queue also fails to boot for me when applied to 5.2.9, so this is not a false positive. I had a handful of the queued patches in my own tree and know which ones work in 5.2.9, but the new ones for -mm look like they could cause problems. I'll try a few things..
The culprit is "exit-make-setting-exit_state-consistent.patch", which was successfully added everywhere. This explains why KCI is consistently sad everywhere, too. :)
Removing that patch from the queue results in a working kernel (with the version updated by me):
$cat /proc/version Linux version 5.2.10 (root@ragnarok) (gcc version 9.2.0 (Gentoo 9.2.0 p1)) #1 SMP Sun Aug 18 23:50:50 CEST 2019
Are you seeing the same failure with upstream kernel?
-- Thanks, Sasha
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 11:57:05PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
On 8/18/19 10:38 PM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
On 8/18/19 8:49 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 02:31:22PM -0400, CKI Project wrote:
Hello,
We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
Kernel repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Commit: 61d06c60569f - Linux 5.2.10-rc1
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: FAILED (see details below) Merge: OK Compile: OK Tests: FAILED
All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/108998
One or more kernel tests failed:
aarch64: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
ppc64le: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
x86_64: ❌ Boot test ❌ Boot test
Are these all real?
Hi Greg,
the current 5.2-queue also fails to boot for me when applied to 5.2.9, so this is not a false positive. I had a handful of the queued patches in my own tree and know which ones work in 5.2.9, but the new ones for -mm look like they could cause problems. I'll try a few things..
The culprit is "exit-make-setting-exit_state-consistent.patch", which was successfully added everywhere. This explains why KCI is consistently sad everywhere, too. :)
Removing that patch from the queue results in a working kernel (with the version updated by me):
$cat /proc/version Linux version 5.2.10 (root@ragnarok) (gcc version 9.2.0 (Gentoo 9.2.0 p1)) #1 SMP Sun Aug 18 23:50:50 CEST 2019
Thanks for this, looks like kernelci and Linaro's testing are all failing as well, so this isn't isolated.
Sasha, the above commit relies on commit b191d6491be6 ("pidfd: fix a poll race when setting exit_state") which is in 5.3-rc, so I'll drop it from everywhere now...
thanks,
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
CKI Project -
Greg KH -
Holger Hoffstätte -
Sasha Levin