During probing, the driver tries to get a list (mask) of supported command types in port100_get_command_type_mask() function. The value is u64 and 0 is treated as invalid mask (no commands supported). The function however returns also -ERRNO as u64 which will be interpret as valid command mask.
Return 0 on every error case of port100_get_command_type_mask(), so the probing will stop.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 0347a6ab300a ("NFC: port100: Commands mechanism implementation") Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com --- drivers/nfc/port100.c | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c index 1296148b4566..ec1630bfedf4 100644 --- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c +++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c @@ -1109,15 +1109,11 @@ static u64 port100_get_command_type_mask(struct port100 *dev)
skb = port100_alloc_skb(dev, 0); if (!skb) - return -ENOMEM; + return 0;
- nfc_err(&dev->interface->dev, "%s:%d\n", __func__, __LINE__); resp = port100_send_cmd_sync(dev, PORT100_CMD_GET_COMMAND_TYPE, skb); - if (IS_ERR(resp)) { - nfc_err(&dev->interface->dev, "%s:%d\n", __func__, __LINE__); - return PTR_ERR(resp); - } - nfc_err(&dev->interface->dev, "%s:%d\n", __func__, __LINE__); + if (IS_ERR(resp)) + return 0;
if (resp->len < 8) mask = 0;
On 25/10/2021 16:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
During probing, the driver tries to get a list (mask) of supported command types in port100_get_command_type_mask() function. The value is u64 and 0 is treated as invalid mask (no commands supported). The function however returns also -ERRNO as u64 which will be interpret as valid command mask.
Return 0 on every error case of port100_get_command_type_mask(), so the probing will stop.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 0347a6ab300a ("NFC: port100: Commands mechanism implementation") Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com
drivers/nfc/port100.c | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c index 1296148b4566..ec1630bfedf4 100644 --- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c +++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c @@ -1109,15 +1109,11 @@ static u64 port100_get_command_type_mask(struct port100 *dev) skb = port100_alloc_skb(dev, 0); if (!skb)
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
- nfc_err(&dev->interface->dev, "%s:%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
Mistake, please ignore.
Best regards, Krzysztof
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org