hallo Greg
5.18.13-rc1
compiles here with a lot of warnings on an x86_64 (Intel i5-11400, Fedora 36)
warnings all over the tree like this: ... arch/x86/crypto/twofish-x86_64-asm_64.o: warning: objtool: twofish_enc_blk()+0x7b2: 'naked' return found in RETPOLINE build arch/x86/crypto/twofish-x86_64-asm_64.o: warning: objtool: twofish_dec_blk()+0x7b2: 'naked' return found in RETPOLINE build ...
patch was applied to an clean 5.18.12
is it just me ?
Tested-by: Ronald Warsow rwarsow@gmx.de
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 4:35 PM Ronald Warsow rwarsow@gmx.de wrote:
hallo Greg
5.18.13-rc1
compiles here with a lot of warnings on an x86_64 (Intel i5-11400, Fedora 36)
warnings all over the tree like this: ... arch/x86/crypto/twofish-x86_64-asm_64.o: warning: objtool: twofish_enc_blk()+0x7b2: 'naked' return found in RETPOLINE build arch/x86/crypto/twofish-x86_64-asm_64.o: warning: objtool: twofish_dec_blk()+0x7b2: 'naked' return found in RETPOLINE build ...
patch was applied to an clean 5.18.12
is it just me ?
No, I can see on my builds too.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 05:33:48PM +0200, Ronald Warsow wrote:
hallo Greg
5.18.13-rc1
compiles here with a lot of warnings on an x86_64 (Intel i5-11400, Fedora 36)
warnings all over the tree like this: ... arch/x86/crypto/twofish-x86_64-asm_64.o: warning: objtool: twofish_enc_blk()+0x7b2: 'naked' return found in RETPOLINE build arch/x86/crypto/twofish-x86_64-asm_64.o: warning: objtool: twofish_dec_blk()+0x7b2: 'naked' return found in RETPOLINE build ...
patch was applied to an clean 5.18.12
is it just me ?
Should now be resolved in -rc3. If not, please let me know.
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org