Signed-off-by: Chuanhua Han chuanhua.han@nxp.com --- Changes in v3: Rename variable name "val" to "opcode_addr_dummy_sum". Place the legitimacy of the transfer size(i.e., "pi_max_message_size(mem->spi)" and "opcode_addr_dummy_sum") into "if (! ctlr - > mem_ops | |! ctlr-> mem_ops->exec_op) {" structure and add "spi_max_transfer_size(mem->spi) and opcode_addr_dummy_sum". Adjust the formatting alignment of your code. "(unsigned long)op->data.nbytes" was modified to "(unsigned long)(op->data.nbytes)".
Fixes: c36ff266dc82 ("spi: Extend the core to ease integration of SPI memory controllers") --- drivers/spi/spi-mem.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c index 990770d..5ec2bc9 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c @@ -328,10 +328,24 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_mem_exec_op); int spi_mem_adjust_op_size(struct spi_mem *mem, struct spi_mem_op *op) { struct spi_controller *ctlr = mem->spi->controller; + unsigned long opcode_addr_dummy_sum = sizeof(op->cmd.opcode) + + op->addr.nbytes + + op->dummy.nbytes;
if (ctlr->mem_ops && ctlr->mem_ops->adjust_op_size) return ctlr->mem_ops->adjust_op_size(mem, op);
+ if (!ctlr->mem_ops || !ctlr->mem_ops->exec_op) { + if (spi_max_message_size(mem->spi) < opcode_addr_dummy_sum || + spi_max_transfer_size(mem->spi) < opcode_addr_dummy_sum) + return -EINVAL; + + op->data.nbytes = min3((unsigned long)(op->data.nbytes), + spi_max_transfer_size(mem->spi), + spi_max_message_size(mem->spi) - + opcode_addr_dummy_sum); + } + return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_mem_adjust_op_size);
From: Chuanhua Han
Sent: 20 August 2018 13:44
Signed-off-by: Chuanhua Han chuanhua.han@nxp.com
Changes in v3: Rename variable name "val" to "opcode_addr_dummy_sum". Place the legitimacy of the transfer size(i.e., "pi_max_message_size(mem->spi)" and "opcode_addr_dummy_sum") into "if (! ctlr - > mem_ops | |! ctlr-> mem_ops->exec_op) {" structure and add "spi_max_transfer_size(mem->spi) and opcode_addr_dummy_sum". Adjust the formatting alignment of your code. "(unsigned long)op->data.nbytes" was modified to "(unsigned long)(op->data.nbytes)".
Fixes: c36ff266dc82 ("spi: Extend the core to ease integration of SPI memory controllers")
drivers/spi/spi-mem.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c index 990770d..5ec2bc9 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c @@ -328,10 +328,24 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_mem_exec_op); int spi_mem_adjust_op_size(struct spi_mem *mem, struct spi_mem_op *op) { struct spi_controller *ctlr = mem->spi->controller;
- unsigned long opcode_addr_dummy_sum = sizeof(op->cmd.opcode) +
op->addr.nbytes +
op->dummy.nbytes;
I'd split that (and shorten the variable name) to avoid line wrap. Maybe:
unsigned long len;
len = sizeof(op->cmd.opcode) + op->addr.nbytes + op->dummy.nbytes;
if (ctlr->mem_ops && ctlr->mem_ops->adjust_op_size) return ctlr->mem_ops->adjust_op_size(mem, op);
- if (!ctlr->mem_ops || !ctlr->mem_ops->exec_op) {
if (spi_max_message_size(mem->spi) < opcode_addr_dummy_sum ||
spi_max_transfer_size(mem->spi) < opcode_addr_dummy_sum)
return -EINVAL;
Those comparisons are lexically backwards, you want 'value op constant'. So: if (len > spi_max_message_size(mem->spi) || len > spi_max_transfer_size(mem->spi)) return -EINVAL. Although I'm surprised you need to do both comparisons.
op->data.nbytes = min3((unsigned long)(op->data.nbytes),
spi_max_transfer_size(mem->spi),
spi_max_message_size(mem->spi) -
opcode_addr_dummy_sum);
That looks like a strange limit...
- }
- return 0;
} EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_mem_adjust_op_size); -- 2.7.4
David
- Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:01:13 +0000 David Laight David.Laight@ACULAB.COM wrote:
From: Chuanhua Han
Sent: 20 August 2018 13:44
Still no message here, and the subject prefix is still wrong.
Fixes and Cc-stable tags should be placed here...
Signed-off-by: Chuanhua Han chuanhua.han@nxp.com
Changes in v3: Rename variable name "val" to "opcode_addr_dummy_sum". Place the legitimacy of the transfer size(i.e., "pi_max_message_size(mem->spi)" and "opcode_addr_dummy_sum") into "if (! ctlr - > mem_ops | |! ctlr-> mem_ops->exec_op) {" structure and add "spi_max_transfer_size(mem->spi) and opcode_addr_dummy_sum". Adjust the formatting alignment of your code. "(unsigned long)op->data.nbytes" was modified to "(unsigned long)(op->data.nbytes)".
Fixes: c36ff266dc82 ("spi: Extend the core to ease integration of SPI memory controllers")
... not here.
The changelog should also contain a "Changes in v2" section.
drivers/spi/spi-mem.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c index 990770d..5ec2bc9 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c @@ -328,10 +328,24 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_mem_exec_op); int spi_mem_adjust_op_size(struct spi_mem *mem, struct spi_mem_op *op) { struct spi_controller *ctlr = mem->spi->controller;
- unsigned long opcode_addr_dummy_sum = sizeof(op->cmd.opcode) +
op->addr.nbytes +
op->dummy.nbytes;
Yep, the var name is definitely too long.
I'd split that (and shorten the variable name) to avoid line wrap. Maybe:
unsigned long len;
len = sizeof(op->cmd.opcode) + op->addr.nbytes + op->dummy.nbytes;
if (ctlr->mem_ops && ctlr->mem_ops->adjust_op_size) return ctlr->mem_ops->adjust_op_size(mem, op);
- if (!ctlr->mem_ops || !ctlr->mem_ops->exec_op) {
if (spi_max_message_size(mem->spi) < opcode_addr_dummy_sum ||
spi_max_transfer_size(mem->spi) < opcode_addr_dummy_sum)
return -EINVAL;
Those comparisons are lexically backwards, you want 'value op constant'. So: if (len > spi_max_message_size(mem->spi) || len > spi_max_transfer_size(mem->spi)) return -EINVAL. Although I'm surprised you need to do both comparisons.
Indeed, spi_max_transfer_size() is enough since it already does a min() with spi_max_message_size().
op->data.nbytes = min3((unsigned long)(op->data.nbytes),
Hm, you should have a cast of size_t, I guess that's what kbuild robots reported.
spi_max_transfer_size(mem->spi),
spi_max_message_size(mem->spi) -
opcode_addr_dummy_sum);
That looks like a strange limit...
We need that to adjust the len of the 2nd transfer (called data in spi-mem) if it's too long to fit in a SPI message or SPI transfer.
- }
- return 0;
} EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_mem_adjust_op_size); -- 2.7.4
David
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org