Hi,
Can we have this backport applied to 5.4 stable, its more of a required fix than an enhancement.
commit df12eb6d6cd920ab2f0e0a43cd6e1c23a05cea91 upstream
The call has a minor api change in 5.4 vs higher, only the pkt arg is required.
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c index d9f0c9c5425a..2f696124bab6 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c @@ -1153,6 +1153,7 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_transport *t, virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt); break; default: + (void)virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(pkt); virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt); break; } --
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 01:53:58PM -0700, Vishnu Rangayyan wrote:
Hi,
Can we have this backport applied to 5.4 stable, its more of a required fix than an enhancement.
commit df12eb6d6cd920ab2f0e0a43cd6e1c23a05cea91 upstream
The call has a minor api change in 5.4 vs higher, only the pkt arg is required.
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c index d9f0c9c5425a..2f696124bab6 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c @@ -1153,6 +1153,7 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_transport *t, virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt); break; default:
virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt); break; }(void)virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(pkt);
--
Please cc: netdev and the developers who wrote/reviewed a patch when asking for it to be submitted to stable, so that they can comment on it.
Can you resend it and do that?
thanks,
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org