From: John Garry john.garry@huawei.com
commit e0257a01d6689c273a019756ed5e13911cc1bfed upstream.
Commit 0e0ae8742207c3b4 ("perf list: Display hybrid PMU events with cpu type") changes the event list for uncore PMUs or arm64 heterogeneous CPU systems, such that duplicate aliases are incorrectly listed per PMU (which they should not be), like:
# perf list ... unc_cbo_cache_lookup.any_es [Unit: uncore_cbox L3 Lookup any request that access cache and found line in E or S-state] unc_cbo_cache_lookup.any_es [Unit: uncore_cbox L3 Lookup any request that access cache and found line in E or S-state] unc_cbo_cache_lookup.any_i [Unit: uncore_cbox L3 Lookup any request that access cache and found line in I-state] unc_cbo_cache_lookup.any_i [Unit: uncore_cbox L3 Lookup any request that access cache and found line in I-state] ...
Notice how the events are listed twice.
The named commit changed how we remove duplicate events, in that events for different PMUs are not treated as duplicates. I suppose this is to handle how "Each hybrid pmu event has been assigned with a pmu name".
Fix PMU alias listing by restoring behaviour to remove duplicates for non-hybrid PMUs.
Fixes: 0e0ae8742207c3b4 ("perf list: Display hybrid PMU events with cpu type") Signed-off-by: John Garry john.garry@huawei.com Tested-by: Zhengjun Xing zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com Cc: Alexander Shishkin alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com Cc: Ian Rogers irogers@google.com Cc: Ingo Molnar mingo@redhat.com Cc: Jiri Olsa jolsa@redhat.com Cc: Kan Liang kan.liang@linux.intel.com Cc: Mark Rutland mark.rutland@arm.com Cc: Namhyung Kim namhyung@kernel.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1640103090-140490-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huaw... Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo acme@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c @@ -1659,6 +1659,21 @@ bool is_pmu_core(const char *name) return !strcmp(name, "cpu") || is_arm_pmu_core(name); }
+static bool pmu_alias_is_duplicate(struct sevent *alias_a, + struct sevent *alias_b) +{ + /* Different names -> never duplicates */ + if (strcmp(alias_a->name, alias_b->name)) + return false; + + /* Don't remove duplicates for hybrid PMUs */ + if (perf_pmu__is_hybrid(alias_a->pmu) && + perf_pmu__is_hybrid(alias_b->pmu)) + return false; + + return true; +} + void print_pmu_events(const char *event_glob, bool name_only, bool quiet_flag, bool long_desc, bool details_flag, bool deprecated, const char *pmu_name) @@ -1744,12 +1759,8 @@ void print_pmu_events(const char *event_ qsort(aliases, len, sizeof(struct sevent), cmp_sevent); for (j = 0; j < len; j++) { /* Skip duplicates */ - if (j > 0 && !strcmp(aliases[j].name, aliases[j - 1].name)) { - if (!aliases[j].pmu || !aliases[j - 1].pmu || - !strcmp(aliases[j].pmu, aliases[j - 1].pmu)) { - continue; - } - } + if (j > 0 && pmu_alias_is_duplicate(&aliases[j], &aliases[j - 1])) + continue;
if (name_only) { printf("%s ", aliases[j].name);