On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 at 20:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.238 release. There are 270 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:42:20 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.238-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
There are two issues,
1) Regressions on riscv defconfig builds failing with gcc-12, gcc-8 and clang-20 toolchains on 5.10.238-rc1.
Regression Analysis: - New regression? Yes - Reproducible? Yes
Build regression: riscv defconfig timer-riscv.c:82:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_clock_event_stop'
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
Build log: --------- drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c:82:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_clock_event_stop' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 82 | riscv_clock_event_stop(); | ^ 1 error generated.
This patch caused the build error,
clocksource/drivers/timer-riscv: Stop stimecmp when cpu hotplug [ Upstream commit 70c93b026ed07078e933583591aa9ca6701cd9da ]
## Steps to reproduce - tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch riscv --toolchain clang-20 --kconfig defconfig LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1
## Build riscv * Build log: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.... * Build details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.... * Build history: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.... * architecture: riscv * toolchain: gcc-8, gcc-12, clang-20 * config : defconfig * Build config: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2xxPulf5bqlsj7nSlN9Pn... * Build: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2xxPulf5bqlsj7nSlN9Pn...
2) The following build warnings were noticed on arm with clang-20.
Build regression: arm at91_dt_defconfig warning comparison of distinct pointer types ('typeof (nblocks) *' (aka 'unsigned int *') and 'typeof (num_node_state(N_ONLINE) * ((1UL) << 12) / locksz) *' (aka 'unsigned long *')) [-Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types]
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
Build warnings on arm: --------- net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c:946:12: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types ('typeof (nblocks) *' (aka 'unsigned int *') and 'typeof (num_node_state(N_ONLINE) * ((1UL) << 12) / locksz) *' (aka 'unsigned long *')) [-Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types] 946 | nblocks = max(nblocks, num_online_nodes() * PAGE_SIZE / locksz); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 warning generated.
This commit is causing build warnings, tcp: bring back NUMA dispersion in inet_ehash_locks_alloc() [ Upstream commit f8ece40786c9342249aa0a1b55e148ee23b2a746 ]
# Steps to reproduce - tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch arm --toolchain clang-20 --kconfig at91_dt_defconfig LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=0
## Build arm * architecture: arm * toolchain: clang-20 * config: at91_dt_defconfig * Build config: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2xxPtpUSdrY70QnawZR0f... * Build: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2xxPtpUSdrY70QnawZR0f...
## Build * kernel: 5.10.238-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git commit: 8bfb881081935b7a621f358516e28f4470af3296 * git describe: v5.10.237-271-g8bfb88108193 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.236-287-gce0fd5a9f1a4) * riscv, build - clang-20-defconfig - gcc-12-defconfig - gcc-8-defconfig
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.236-287-gce0fd5a9f1a4)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.236-287-gce0fd5a9f1a4)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.236-287-gce0fd5a9f1a4)
## Test result summary total: 36900, pass: 27422, fail: 1956, skip: 7366, xfail: 156
## Build Summary * arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed * arm: 100 total, 100 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 28 total, 28 passed, 0 failed * i386: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed * mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed * powerpc: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 9 total, 6 passed, 3 failed * s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * boot * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-exec * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user_events * kselftest-vDSO * kselftest-x86 * kunit * lava * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-build-clang * log-parser-build-gcc * log-parser-test * ltp-capability * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * perf * rcutorture
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org