On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 09:50:43AM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
This patch fixes a device reference count leak …
Would a corresponding imperative wording become helpful for an improved change description? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Docu...
Would a summary phrase like “Fix reference count leak in i2cr_scom_probe()” be nicer?
Regards, Markus
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot