6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso pablo@netfilter.org
[ Upstream commit 13210fc63f353fe78584048079343413a3cdf819 ]
All these cases cause imbalance between BIND and UNBIND calls:
- Delete an interface from a flowtable with multiple interfaces
- Add a (device to a) flowtable with --check flag
- Delete a netns containing a flowtable
- In an interactive nft session, create a table with owner flag and flowtable inside, then quit.
Fix it by calling FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND when unregistering hooks, then remove late FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND call when destroying flowtable.
Fixes: ff4bf2f42a40 ("netfilter: nf_tables: add nft_unregister_flowtable_hook()") Reported-by: Phil Sutter phil@nwl.cc Tested-by: Phil Sutter phil@nwl.cc Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso pablo@netfilter.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c index 0c5ff4afc370..42dc8cc721ff 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c @@ -8565,6 +8565,7 @@ static void nft_unregister_flowtable_hook(struct net *net, }
static void __nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(struct net *net, + struct nft_flowtable *flowtable, struct list_head *hook_list, bool release_netdev) { @@ -8572,6 +8573,8 @@ static void __nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(struct net *net,
list_for_each_entry_safe(hook, next, hook_list, list) { nf_unregister_net_hook(net, &hook->ops); + flowtable->data.type->setup(&flowtable->data, hook->ops.dev, + FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND); if (release_netdev) { list_del(&hook->list); kfree_rcu(hook, rcu); @@ -8580,9 +8583,10 @@ static void __nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(struct net *net, }
static void nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(struct net *net, + struct nft_flowtable *flowtable, struct list_head *hook_list) { - __nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(net, hook_list, false); + __nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(net, flowtable, hook_list, false); }
static int nft_register_flowtable_net_hooks(struct net *net, @@ -9223,8 +9227,6 @@ static void nf_tables_flowtable_destroy(struct nft_flowtable *flowtable)
flowtable->data.type->free(&flowtable->data); list_for_each_entry_safe(hook, next, &flowtable->hook_list, list) { - flowtable->data.type->setup(&flowtable->data, hook->ops.dev, - FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND); list_del_rcu(&hook->list); kfree_rcu(hook, rcu); } @@ -10622,6 +10624,7 @@ static int nf_tables_commit(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb) &nft_trans_flowtable_hooks(trans), trans->msg_type); nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(net, + nft_trans_flowtable(trans), &nft_trans_flowtable_hooks(trans)); } else { list_del_rcu(&nft_trans_flowtable(trans)->list); @@ -10630,6 +10633,7 @@ static int nf_tables_commit(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb) NULL, trans->msg_type); nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(net, + nft_trans_flowtable(trans), &nft_trans_flowtable(trans)->hook_list); } break; @@ -10901,11 +10905,13 @@ static int __nf_tables_abort(struct net *net, enum nfnl_abort_action action) case NFT_MSG_NEWFLOWTABLE: if (nft_trans_flowtable_update(trans)) { nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(net, + nft_trans_flowtable(trans), &nft_trans_flowtable_hooks(trans)); } else { nft_use_dec_restore(&table->use); list_del_rcu(&nft_trans_flowtable(trans)->list); nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(net, + nft_trans_flowtable(trans), &nft_trans_flowtable(trans)->hook_list); } break; @@ -11498,7 +11504,8 @@ static void __nft_release_hook(struct net *net, struct nft_table *table) list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list) __nf_tables_unregister_hook(net, table, chain, true); list_for_each_entry(flowtable, &table->flowtables, list) - __nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(net, &flowtable->hook_list, + __nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(net, flowtable, + &flowtable->hook_list, true); }