5.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Frank Rowand frank.rowand@sony.com
[ Upstream commit f4056e705b2ef7f123a188f6aee23ade70e7d793 ]
Geert reports that gpio hog nodes are not properly processed when the gpio hog node is added via an overlay reply and provides an RFC patch to fix the problem [1].
Add a unittest that shows the problem. Unittest will report "1 failed" test before applying Geert's RFC patch and "0 failed" after applying Geert's RFC patch.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20191230133852.5890-1-geert+renesas...
Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand frank.rowand@sony.com Signed-off-by: Rob Herring robh@kernel.org Stable-dep-of: 607aad1e4356 ("of: unittest: Fix compile in the non-dynamic case") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile | 8 +- drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_01.dts | 23 ++ drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_02a.dts | 16 ++ drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_02b.dts | 16 ++ drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_03.dts | 23 ++ drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_04a.dts | 16 ++ drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_04b.dts | 16 ++ drivers/of/unittest.c | 253 ++++++++++++++++++ 8 files changed, 370 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_01.dts create mode 100644 drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_02a.dts create mode 100644 drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_02b.dts create mode 100644 drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_03.dts create mode 100644 drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_04a.dts create mode 100644 drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_04b.dts
diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile b/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile index 9b6807065827..009f4045c8e4 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile @@ -21,7 +21,13 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY) += overlay.dtb.o \ overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dtb.o \ overlay_bad_phandle.dtb.o \ overlay_bad_symbol.dtb.o \ - overlay_base.dtb.o + overlay_base.dtb.o \ + overlay_gpio_01.dtb.o \ + overlay_gpio_02a.dtb.o \ + overlay_gpio_02b.dtb.o \ + overlay_gpio_03.dtb.o \ + overlay_gpio_04a.dtb.o \ + overlay_gpio_04b.dtb.o
# enable creation of __symbols__ node DTC_FLAGS_overlay += -@ diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_01.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_01.dts new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..699ff104ae10 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_01.dts @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/dts-v1/; +/plugin/; + +&unittest_test_bus { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + gpio@0 { + compatible = "unittest-gpio"; + reg = <0>; + gpio-controller; + #gpio-cells = <2>; + ngpios = <2>; + gpio-line-names = "line-A", "line-B"; + + line-b { + gpio-hog; + gpios = <2 0>; + input; + line-name = "line-B-input"; + }; + }; +}; diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_02a.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_02a.dts new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ec59aff6ed47 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_02a.dts @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/dts-v1/; +/plugin/; + +&unittest_test_bus { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + gpio@2 { + compatible = "unittest-gpio"; + reg = <2>; + gpio-controller; + #gpio-cells = <2>; + ngpios = <2>; + gpio-line-names = "line-A", "line-B"; + }; +}; diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_02b.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_02b.dts new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..43ce111d41ce --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_02b.dts @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/dts-v1/; +/plugin/; + +&unittest_test_bus { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + gpio@2 { + line-a { + gpio-hog; + gpios = <1 0>; + input; + line-name = "line-A-input"; + }; + }; +}; diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_03.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_03.dts new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..6e0312340a1b --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_03.dts @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/dts-v1/; +/plugin/; + +&unittest_test_bus { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + gpio@3 { + compatible = "unittest-gpio"; + reg = <3>; + gpio-controller; + #gpio-cells = <2>; + ngpios = <2>; + gpio-line-names = "line-A", "line-B", "line-C", "line-D"; + + line-d { + gpio-hog; + gpios = <4 0>; + input; + line-name = "line-D-input"; + }; + }; +}; diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_04a.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_04a.dts new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7b1e04ebfa7a --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_04a.dts @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/dts-v1/; +/plugin/; + +&unittest_test_bus { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + gpio@4 { + compatible = "unittest-gpio"; + reg = <4>; + gpio-controller; + #gpio-cells = <2>; + ngpios = <2>; + gpio-line-names = "line-A", "line-B", "line-C", "line-D"; + }; +}; diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_04b.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_04b.dts new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..a14e95c6699a --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_gpio_04b.dts @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/dts-v1/; +/plugin/; + +&unittest_test_bus { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + gpio@4 { + line-c { + gpio-hog; + gpios = <3 0>; + input; + line-name = "line-C-input"; + }; + }; +}; diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c index 1ed470b03cd7..7585df5e3daf 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/i2c.h> #include <linux/i2c-mux.h> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
#include <linux/bitops.h>
@@ -45,6 +46,97 @@ static struct unittest_results { failed; \ })
+/* + * Expected message may have a message level other than KERN_INFO. + * Print the expected message only if the current loglevel will allow + * the actual message to print. + */ +#define EXPECT_BEGIN(level, fmt, ...) \ + printk(level pr_fmt("EXPECT \ : ") fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) + +#define EXPECT_END(level, fmt, ...) \ + printk(level pr_fmt("EXPECT / : ") fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) + +struct unittest_gpio_dev { + struct gpio_chip chip; +}; + +static int unittest_gpio_chip_request_count; +static int unittest_gpio_probe_count; +static int unittest_gpio_probe_pass_count; + +static int unittest_gpio_chip_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) +{ + unittest_gpio_chip_request_count++; + + pr_debug("%s(): %s %d %d\n", __func__, chip->label, offset, + unittest_gpio_chip_request_count); + return 0; +} + +static int unittest_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct unittest_gpio_dev *devptr; + int ret; + + unittest_gpio_probe_count++; + + devptr = kzalloc(sizeof(*devptr), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!devptr) + return -ENOMEM; + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, devptr); + + devptr->chip.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node; + devptr->chip.label = "of-unittest-gpio"; + devptr->chip.base = -1; /* dynamic allocation */ + devptr->chip.ngpio = 5; + devptr->chip.request = unittest_gpio_chip_request; + + ret = gpiochip_add_data(&devptr->chip, NULL); + + unittest(!ret, + "gpiochip_add_data() for node @%pOF failed, ret = %d\n", devptr->chip.of_node, ret); + + if (!ret) + unittest_gpio_probe_pass_count++; + return ret; +} + +static int unittest_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct unittest_gpio_dev *gdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; + + dev_dbg(dev, "%s for node @%pOF\n", __func__, np); + + if (!gdev) + return -EINVAL; + + if (gdev->chip.base != -1) + gpiochip_remove(&gdev->chip); + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL); + kfree(pdev); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct of_device_id unittest_gpio_id[] = { + { .compatible = "unittest-gpio", }, + {} +}; + +static struct platform_driver unittest_gpio_driver = { + .probe = unittest_gpio_probe, + .remove = unittest_gpio_remove, + .driver = { + .name = "unittest-gpio", + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(unittest_gpio_id), + }, +}; + static void __init of_unittest_find_node_by_name(void) { struct device_node *np; @@ -2114,6 +2206,153 @@ static inline void of_unittest_overlay_i2c_15(void) { }
#endif
+static void __init of_unittest_overlay_gpio(void) +{ + int chip_request_count; + int probe_pass_count; + int ret; + + /* + * tests: apply overlays before registering driver + * Similar to installing a driver as a module, the + * driver is registered after applying the overlays. + * + * - apply overlay_gpio_01 + * - apply overlay_gpio_02a + * - apply overlay_gpio_02b + * - register driver + * + * register driver will result in + * - probe and processing gpio hog for overlay_gpio_01 + * - probe for overlay_gpio_02a + * - processing gpio for overlay_gpio_02b + */ + + probe_pass_count = unittest_gpio_probe_pass_count; + chip_request_count = unittest_gpio_chip_request_count; + + /* + * overlay_gpio_01 contains gpio node and child gpio hog node + * overlay_gpio_02a contains gpio node + * overlay_gpio_02b contains child gpio hog node + */ + + unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_gpio_01", NULL), + "Adding overlay 'overlay_gpio_01' failed\n"); + + unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_gpio_02a", NULL), + "Adding overlay 'overlay_gpio_02a' failed\n"); + + unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_gpio_02b", NULL), + "Adding overlay 'overlay_gpio_02b' failed\n"); + + /* + * messages are the result of the probes, after the + * driver is registered + */ + + EXPECT_BEGIN(KERN_INFO, + "GPIO line <<int>> (line-B-input) hogged as input\n"); + + EXPECT_BEGIN(KERN_INFO, + "GPIO line <<int>> (line-A-input) hogged as input\n"); + + ret = platform_driver_register(&unittest_gpio_driver); + if (unittest(ret == 0, "could not register unittest gpio driver\n")) + return; + + EXPECT_END(KERN_INFO, + "GPIO line <<int>> (line-A-input) hogged as input\n"); + EXPECT_END(KERN_INFO, + "GPIO line <<int>> (line-B-input) hogged as input\n"); + + unittest(probe_pass_count + 2 == unittest_gpio_probe_pass_count, + "unittest_gpio_probe() failed or not called\n"); + + unittest(chip_request_count + 2 == unittest_gpio_chip_request_count, + "unittest_gpio_chip_request() called %d times (expected 1 time)\n", + unittest_gpio_chip_request_count - chip_request_count); + + /* + * tests: apply overlays after registering driver + * + * Similar to a driver built-in to the kernel, the + * driver is registered before applying the overlays. + * + * overlay_gpio_03 contains gpio node and child gpio hog node + * + * - apply overlay_gpio_03 + * + * apply overlay will result in + * - probe and processing gpio hog. + */ + + probe_pass_count = unittest_gpio_probe_pass_count; + chip_request_count = unittest_gpio_chip_request_count; + + EXPECT_BEGIN(KERN_INFO, + "GPIO line <<int>> (line-D-input) hogged as input\n"); + + /* overlay_gpio_03 contains gpio node and child gpio hog node */ + + unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_gpio_03", NULL), + "Adding overlay 'overlay_gpio_03' failed\n"); + + EXPECT_END(KERN_INFO, + "GPIO line <<int>> (line-D-input) hogged as input\n"); + + unittest(probe_pass_count + 1 == unittest_gpio_probe_pass_count, + "unittest_gpio_probe() failed or not called\n"); + + unittest(chip_request_count + 1 == unittest_gpio_chip_request_count, + "unittest_gpio_chip_request() called %d times (expected 1 time)\n", + unittest_gpio_chip_request_count - chip_request_count); + + /* + * overlay_gpio_04a contains gpio node + * + * - apply overlay_gpio_04a + * + * apply the overlay will result in + * - probe for overlay_gpio_04a + */ + + probe_pass_count = unittest_gpio_probe_pass_count; + chip_request_count = unittest_gpio_chip_request_count; + + /* overlay_gpio_04a contains gpio node */ + + unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_gpio_04a", NULL), + "Adding overlay 'overlay_gpio_04a' failed\n"); + + unittest(probe_pass_count + 1 == unittest_gpio_probe_pass_count, + "unittest_gpio_probe() failed or not called\n"); + + /* + * overlay_gpio_04b contains child gpio hog node + * + * - apply overlay_gpio_04b + * + * apply the overlay will result in + * - processing gpio for overlay_gpio_04b + */ + + EXPECT_BEGIN(KERN_INFO, + "GPIO line <<int>> (line-C-input) hogged as input\n"); + + /* overlay_gpio_04b contains child gpio hog node */ + + unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_gpio_04b", NULL), + "Adding overlay 'overlay_gpio_04b' failed\n"); + + EXPECT_END(KERN_INFO, + "GPIO line <<int>> (line-C-input) hogged as input\n"); + + unittest(chip_request_count + 1 == unittest_gpio_chip_request_count, + "unittest_gpio_chip_request() called %d times (expected 1 time)\n", + unittest_gpio_chip_request_count - chip_request_count); +} + static void __init of_unittest_overlay(void) { struct device_node *bus_np = NULL; @@ -2173,6 +2412,8 @@ static void __init of_unittest_overlay(void) of_unittest_overlay_i2c_cleanup(); #endif
+ of_unittest_overlay_gpio(); + of_unittest_destroy_tracked_overlays();
out: @@ -2226,6 +2467,12 @@ OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_11); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_12); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_13); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_15); +OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_gpio_01); +OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_gpio_02a); +OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_gpio_02b); +OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_gpio_03); +OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_gpio_04a); +OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_gpio_04b); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_add_dup_node); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_add_dup_prop); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_phandle); @@ -2250,6 +2497,12 @@ static struct overlay_info overlays[] = { OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_12, 0), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_13, 0), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_15, 0), + OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_gpio_01, 0), + OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_gpio_02a, 0), + OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_gpio_02b, 0), + OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_gpio_03, 0), + OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_gpio_04a, 0), + OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_gpio_04b, 0), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_add_dup_node, -EINVAL), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_add_dup_prop, -EINVAL), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_phandle, -EINVAL),