5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Michael Kelley mhklinux@outlook.com
[ Upstream commit 73fe9073c0cc28056cb9de0c8a516dac070f1d1f ]
The VMBus driver manages the MMIO space it owns via the hyperv_mmio resource tree. Because the synthetic video framebuffer portion of the MMIO space is initially setup by the Hyper-V host for each guest, the VMBus driver does an early reserve of that portion of MMIO space in the hyperv_mmio resource tree. It saves a pointer to that resource in fb_mmio. When a VMBus driver requests MMIO space and passes "true" for the "fb_overlap_ok" argument, the reserved framebuffer space is used if possible. In that case it's not necessary to do another request against the "shadow" hyperv_mmio resource tree because that resource was already requested in the early reserve steps.
However, the vmbus_free_mmio() function currently does no special handling for the fb_mmio resource. When a framebuffer device is removed, or the driver is unbound, the current code for vmbus_free_mmio() releases the reserved resource, leaving fb_mmio pointing to memory that has been freed. If the same or another driver is subsequently bound to the device, vmbus_allocate_mmio() checks against fb_mmio, and potentially gets garbage. Furthermore a second unbind operation produces this "nonexistent resource" error because of the unbalanced behavior between vmbus_allocate_mmio() and vmbus_free_mmio():
[ 55.499643] resource: Trying to free nonexistent resource <0x00000000f0000000-0x00000000f07fffff>
Fix this by adding logic to vmbus_free_mmio() to recognize when MMIO space in the fb_mmio reserved area would be released, and don't release it. This filtering ensures the fb_mmio resource always exists, and makes vmbus_free_mmio() more parallel with vmbus_allocate_mmio().
Fixes: be000f93e5d7 ("drivers:hv: Track allocations of children of hv_vmbus in private resource tree") Signed-off-by: Michael Kelley mhklinux@outlook.com Tested-by: Saurabh Sengar ssengar@linux.microsoft.com Reviewed-by: Saurabh Sengar ssengar@linux.microsoft.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250310035208.275764-1-mhklinux@outlook.com Signed-off-by: Wei Liu wei.liu@kernel.org Message-ID: 20250310035208.275764-1-mhklinux@outlook.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c index 02aeb192e3671..cb3a5b13c3ec2 100644 --- a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c +++ b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c @@ -2419,12 +2419,25 @@ void vmbus_free_mmio(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t size) struct resource *iter;
mutex_lock(&hyperv_mmio_lock); + + /* + * If all bytes of the MMIO range to be released are within the + * special case fb_mmio shadow region, skip releasing the shadow + * region since no corresponding __request_region() was done + * in vmbus_allocate_mmio(). + */ + if (fb_mmio && start >= fb_mmio->start && + (start + size - 1 <= fb_mmio->end)) + goto skip_shadow_release; + for (iter = hyperv_mmio; iter; iter = iter->sibling) { if ((iter->start >= start + size) || (iter->end <= start)) continue;
__release_region(iter, start, size); } + +skip_shadow_release: release_mem_region(start, size); mutex_unlock(&hyperv_mmio_lock);