25 Mar
2022
25 Mar
'22
4:32 p.m.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 07:02:16PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote:
If ddbd89deb7d3 alone turns out to work OK then I'd be inclined to try a partial revert of just that one hunk.
I'm not against being pragmatic and doing the partial revert. But as explained above, I do believe for correctness of swiotlb we ultimately do need that change. So if the revert is the short term solution, what should be our mid-term road-map?
Unless I'm misunderstanding this thread we found the bug in ath9k and have a fix for that now?